eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Communication and Doctors — Personal Perspective

Professional discretion, courtesy and plain good manners: an anecdotal and personal view

Jane L Nuttall
MJA 2005; 183 (11/12): 627-628

A radiologist presents examples of discourtesy between doctors and suggests a return to good manners and professionalism

In 2004, I presented a poster of my musings on my professional experiences as a radiologist at the hands of medical colleagues. While I felt very strongly about its contents, I thought it would provide a little amusement among the scientific works at the meeting of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists. To my amazement, it struck a chord with many delegates — obviously, I was not alone in seething about discourtesy, which seemed rife, between professional colleagues.

Most doctors (and their medical indemnity organisations) agree that patient rudeness and aggression are an increasing problem, and there is discussion on strategies to deal with these. Insufficiently debated is what I believe to be an increasing trend to discourtesy between referring clinicians and radiologists and between radiological colleagues.

There are international and Australian codes of ethics regarding behaviour between colleagues.1-3 However, my literature search for references to practical day-to-day courtesy between colleagues revealed mainly concerns as to whether it was polite to bill fellow practitioners for services rendered!4

It would be easy to dismiss interprofessional rudeness as a facet of the decline in good manners in the general community. However, I consider that loss of courtesy between colleagues reduces directly the quality of patient care, and also the enjoyment of one’s working life.

The complexities of modern medicine mean that no one doctor can be a “jack of all trades”. However, a lack of respect for the unique skills of another branch of medicine, and an unwillingness to admit some ignorance of these skills and to request advice, result in behaviour such as the following:

  • An x-ray packet was returned to the radiologist with the terse instructions “RE-REPORT” pinned to the packet.

  • In a telephone conversation to the radiologist who had reported a normal result on breast ultrasound examination, a general practitioner said “I ordered you to do an FNA [fine needle aspiration] and I expected it to be done. In future, when I order an FNA, it will be done.”

  • After requesting a large number of examinations without consulting the radiologist, a country GP wrote: “Do not return patient to . . . until all tests ordered have been performed.”

I sometimes feel that doctors have a desire to appear powerful in the eyes of patients. This may have resulted in the handwritten note from a GP, presented to me one morning (Box 1).

Fear of litigation is always with us, and it is tempting to try to share the blame, but there is no excuse for the following outburst:

  • A surgeon opened a telephone conversation to the radiologist with the words “I have told this patient to sue you to hell”.

Colleagues are always going to make mistakes, and one day it is going to be you! One-upmanship is never helpful (Box 2).

Short, friendly, personal letters or phone calls (even in this age of impersonal emails and text messages) are still the better way to point out a colleague’s error. Certainly, a fax received at the reception desk, and available for all to read, causes severe angst in the recipient (Box 3).

And last, but not least, bullying in the playground or the workplace causes untold distress. Remember, you were a junior hospital doctor once!

As a first step towards achieving a more pleasant work environment, the medical colleges should encourage debate on maintaining good manners and professionalism between their fellows.

After that, it’s over to you and me!

1 Note from a general practitioner to a radiologist

This note was presented by a patient when she arrived for an ultrasound examination 2 days before her scheduled appointment.

2 Report from a radiologist to a general practitioner

This report was sent by a radiologist who investigated the patient and reviewed films taken at another radiological practice 2 years previously.

3 Fax from an endoscopist to a radiologist

After the suggested endoscopy, the endoscopist faxed back the radiologist’s report with this handwritten comment.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to my colleagues, both radiological and non-radiological, who encouraged me to turn my poster into this essay, and to the unwitting, anonymous contributors!

Competing interests

None identified.

References
  1. The World Medical Association. International code of medical ethics. Ferney-Voltaire: WMA, 1983. Available at: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/c8.htm (accessed Oct 2005).
  2. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Principles of medical ethics and professionalism in orthopaedic surgery. Rosemont, Ill: AAOS, 2002. Available at: http://www.aaos.org/wordhtml/papers/ethics/prin.htm (accessed Oct 2005).
  3. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Getting on with patients, colleagues and staff. Melbourne: RACGP, 2001. Available at: http://www.racgp.org.au/document.asp?id=1907 (accessed Oct 2005).
  4. American Medical Association. Professional courtesy in the health care fraud and abuse context. Ethical opinion 6.31. Chicago: AMA, 2004. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/4615.html (accessed Oct 2005).

(Received 28 Jan 2005, accepted 29 Sep 2005)

Perth, WA.

Jane L Nuttall, FRCR, FRANZCR, Radiologist.

Correspondence: Dr Jane L Nuttall, PO Box 354, Floreat Forum, WA 6014. jackall3ATbigpond.net.au

AntiSpam note: To avoid spam, authors' email addresses are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address.

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2005 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377