eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Letters

"GP Psych Opinion": evaluation of a psychiatric consultation service

MJA 2005; 183 (9): 494

Graham K Wong,* John W G Tiller

* Psychiatrist, Professor of Psychiatry, Albert Road Clinic, University of Melbourne, 31 Albert Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004. wonggrahamATmh.org.au

To the Editor: We were interested in the recent finding of Simpson and colleagues that a public hospital-based psychiatric assessment service was poorly utilised by general practitioners.1 We established a comparable service in a private setting, with very similar results.

In 2002, the senior psychiatry trainee at the Albert Road Clinic (a private psychiatric hospital in Melbourne) established a GP psychiatric assessment service in response to a previously established need.2 The additional aim was to reduce waiting times and patient costs of seeing a private psychiatrist. There were no out-of-pocket expenses for patients. The service was promoted to 300 local GPs with an individually addressed flyer; a notification was published in the local Division of General Practice newsletter; and discussions were held with the local public mental health service to redirect appropriate referrals from GPs. A survey evaluated GPs’ subsequent satisfaction with the service after a patient was referred and seen.

Over a recruitment period of 15 weeks, an average of only one patient per week was referred. The referring GPs were happy with waiting times (well within a week), the quality of the service, and the communication received by the assessing senior psychiatry trainee.

The similarity between these independently established services and the findings are striking. Of note, was the paucity of referrals from GPs despite clearly expressed needs. We wonder to what extent GPs’ perceptions of difficulties accessing psychiatric assessment from the private sector are the result of a small subset of difficult patients, rather than the general rule.

There are numerous GP and psychiatrist-focused initiatives to overcome reported difficulties accessing specialist psychiatric input for GPs. Most recent of these is a new Medicare Benefits Schedule item that increases remuneration for psychiatrists to outline a detailed management plan for the GP to continue care of the patient.

The findings of these types of psychiatric services directed at GPs highlight the limitations of GP uptake of such incentives. At the very least, there is a requirement for adequate promotion, education and ongoing reinforcement of the referral model to psychiatrists, GPs and practice managers alike.

  1. Simpson AE, Emmerson WB, Frost ADJ, Powell JL. “GP Psych Opinion”: evaluation of a psychiatric consultation service. Med J Aust 2005; 183: 87-90. http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/183_02_180705/sim10741_fm.html <PubMed>
  2. Joint Consultative Committee In Psychiatry. Primary care psychiatry: the last frontier. Melbourne: Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 1997.

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2005 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377