eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

Letters

Preventing intrathecal administration of vincristine

MJA 2004; 181 (8): 464

Peter J Gilbar,* Christine V Carrington†

*† Co-Chair, Committee of Specialty Practice in Oncology, The Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia, Suite 3, 27-33 Raglan Street, South Melbourne, VIC 3205. peter_gilbarAThealth.qld.gov.au

To the Editor: The national media recently highlighted the tragic consequences of the inadvertent spinal administration of the antineoplastic drug vincristine. The 7.30 Report (ABC Television) detailed the case of a young man erroneously administered vincristine intrathecally instead of, as intended, intravenously, resulting in progressive neurotoxicity, paralysis and death.1

Since the first report in 1968 of unintentional intrathecal administration of vincristine,2 many, invariably fatal, cases have been described. These have involved a combination of human and system errors affecting the medical, nursing and pharmacy professions.

On behalf of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia, we recommend the following strategies to reduce the opportunity for error:

Many hospitals currently use syringes for vincristine and increase the diluent volume in the syringe as a deterrent to intrathecal administration; however, fatalities have occurred after the administration of vincristine supplied in 10 mL4 and 20 mL5 syringes. The safest method of eliminating the potential for spinal instillation of vincristine remains the abolition of the syringe as a means of administration.

  1. ABC Television. The 7.30 Report. 2004; 5 May. Hospital mistakes. Available at: www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2004/s1102214.htm (accessed Sep 2004).
  2. Schochet SS, Lampert PW, Earle KM. Neuronal changes induced by intrathecal vincristine sulfate. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1968; 27: 645-658. <PubMed>
  3. Stefanou A, Dooley M. Simple method to eliminate the risk of inadvertent intrathecal vincristine administration [letter]. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 2044-2047. <PubMed>
  4. Meggs WJ, Hoffman RS. Fatality resulting from intraventricular vincristine administration. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998; 36: 243-246. <PubMed>
  5. Alcaraz A, Rey C, Concha A, Medina A. Intrathecal vincristine: fatal myeloencephalopathy despite cerebrospinal fluid perfusion. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2002; 40: 557-561. <PubMed>

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2004 www.mja.com.au ISSN: 0025-729X

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA