|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→ Previous article in this issue
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Obstetrics & gynaecology and women's health
→ More articles on Infectious diseases and parasitology
To the Editor: Giles et al1 have “poisoned the well” for future research by attacking the obstetricians who took the trouble to help them with their study on management of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV.
Many of the discrepancies noted between current practice and the recommendations/guidelines are easy to explain:
Failure to screen. Many obstetricians were told that it is discriminatory to screen for HIV and HCV without extensive pretest counselling. The advice is obsolete, but old habits die slowly.
Failure to recommend caesarean section for women with HIV. Many obstetricians have never seen a case of HIV and would most certainly phone for advice if the situation arose.
Failure to promote breastfeeding. Many obstetricians leave advice on breastfeeding to the midwives and paediatricians. However, the article does concede that mother-to-baby transmission is a theoretical risk, so patients are entitled to be informed.
Failure to adhere to guidelines. Many obstetricians regard guidelines issued by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) as just that — guidelines, not gospel.
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2004 www.mja.com.au ISSN: 0025-729X
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |