eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Letters

The "omnipotent" Science Citation Index Impact Factor

MJA 2003; 179 (2): 120

John H T Ellard

Psychiatrist, Medical Specialist Centre, 710 Military Road, Mosman, NSW.

To the Editor: I read with interest the article in the Journal on ranking medical journals and the fallacies to be found therein.1

I have a simpler method. I subscribe to two classes of journals: those specialising in psychiatry, and more general journals. The psychiatry journals I keep entire. However, as my house is of modest size I cannot do that with the general journals, so I tear out and file the articles that I find interesting and informative. You will be interested to know that in the past month I have filed away one article from the Lancet, one from the New England Journal of Medicine and three from the Medical Journal of Australia. What better measure of merit could there be?

  1. Lundberg GD. The "omnipotent" Science Citation Index Impact Factor. Med J Aust 2003; 178: 253-254. <PubMed><eMJA full text>

(Received 16 Apr 2003, accepted 1 May 2003)

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au Print ISSN: 0025-729X Online ISSN: 1326-5377

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA