|
Home
|
Issues
|
MJA shop
|
MJA Careers
|
Contact
|
Topics
|
Search
|
RSS |
→ Previous article in this issue
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Administration and health services
→ More articles on Emergency medicine
→ More articles on General practice and primary care
→ Search PubMed for related articles
To the Editor: I was interested in the letter by Marks et al,1 indicating that the efforts of over-worked medical staff in emergency departments to introduce patients to local general practitioners had been largely unsuccessful.
A few years ago I noted the success with which this problem was handled by the emergency department management at Huddinge University Hospital in Stockholm. All patients were charged 60 krone at triage. Those who sat in the waiting room were confronted by two large electronic signs. The first listed the waiting time for the 10 most common GP-type ailments. The second listed 10 local GPs, where the consultation fee was then 50 krone, with the offer to refund their initial payment if they chose to take their business elsewhere. I was told that this was the very successful first of eight "barriers" between the emergency department door and the intensive care unit.
Since the middle of last century, Sweden has been held up as a model provider of an egalitarian and "free" healthcare service. Perhaps our country could benefit from the revisions and improvements that the Swedes have made over recent decades.
31 Campsie Street, Campsie, NSW.
Peter J Burke, MB BS, FRACS, Surgeon.Correspondence: Dr P J Burke, 31 Campsie Street, Campsie, NSW 2194. thepburkesATbigpond.com
AntiSpam note: To avoid spam, authors' email addresses are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address.
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au Print ISSN: 0025-729X Online ISSN: 1326-5377
|
Home
|
Issues
|
MJA shop
| Terms of use
|
MJA Careers
|
More...
|
Contact
|
Topics
|
Search
|
RSS |