|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→ Previous article in this issue (letter by Tracy)
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Administration and health services
In reply: Tracy's letter seems to focus on age. The Board's policy about treating family members is not about age, but about the wisdom or otherwise of this practice for medical practitioners at any stage of their career. The policy is not mandatory, but reflects what the Board considers to be prudent practice. The policy does not prohibit writing referrals or repeat prescriptions, but emphasises the importance of having an independent treating practitioner responsible for initiation of treatment and ongoing management.
The New South Wales Medical Board is not alone in having such a policy, with similar views being expressed by UK's General Medical Council, the Medical Council of New Zealand, and Canadian, American and other Australian medical boards. The Australian Medical Association position statement on the "Health of medical practitioners" emphasises the importance of medical practitioners and their families having their own general practitioners.
The case studies were published following a request from members of the profession for the Board to provide examples of problems arising through treating themselves or family members. Sadly, there are many more instances than the five referred to in the article.
The doctors were certainly not ordinary once their attempts to treat family members went astray, but the point is that they had been ordinary doctors who got into difficulties because they crossed the professional–personal boundary.
New South Wales Medical Board, Gladesville, NSW.
Brian C McCaughan, President.Correspondence: Associate Professor B C McCaughan, New South Wales Medical Board, PO Box 104, Gladesville, NSW 1675. MALATdoh.health.nsw.gov.au
AntiSpam note: To avoid attracting spam mail robots, authors' email addresses on the MJA website are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address. We regret the inconvenience this entails. Lobby your government for more effective antispam regulations.
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au Print ISSN: 0025-729X Online ISSN: 1326-5377
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |