|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
"Is sunlight an effective treatment for jaundice in term infants?" A women's health educator at Southern Health wanted to know if there was any evidence that sunlight helps to reduce physiological jaundice in healthy term infants.
Definition of physiological jaundice1
Physiological jaundice is a diagnosis of exclusion. It should not fill any of the following criteria:
Clinical jaundice in the first 24 hours of life;
Total serum bilirubin level > 300 μmol/L in a term infant or > 255 μmol/L in a preterm infant;
Direct reacting serum bilirubin level > 30 μmol/L, persisting more than 10 days in a term infant or 14 days in a preterm infant.
The formulated search question followed a standard patients/interventions/comparisons/outcomes (PICO) format. Patients were term newborn infants with physiological jaundice (see Box), and the intervention was exposure to sunlight. Clinical outcomes of interest were primarily a reduction of jaundice. A randomised controlled trial comparing sunlight exposure to no treatment or another treatment would be the most appropriate study design to answer this clinical question.
The search terms "neonatal jaundice", "hyperbilirubin(a)emia" or "icterus" were combined with the treatment search terms "sunlight", "heliotherapy" or "phototherapy". We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Library, Best Evidence, MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Current Contents and Biological Abstracts. MEDLINE indexes articles published since 1966, but a widely cited and historically important article that provided the first English-language report of an association between light and a reduction in neonatal jaundice was published in 1958.2 In light of this, we hand-searched the print versions of Index Medicus and Science Citation Index from 1958 to 1966. We also searched the websites of a number of organisations: Bandolier, University of Michigan Department of Pediatrics (Evidence-Based Pediatrics), US National Guidelines Clearinghouse, National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Publications Catalogue), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, and UK National Health Service (Institute of Health Sciences Guideline Project).
Our extensive search identified only the one, original study that examined sunlight exposure as a treatment for neonatal jaundice.2 This was a case series reporting the effect of sunlight in jaundiced preterm, rather than term, infants. The same authors then reported a case series of artificial light therapy for jaundiced preterm infants, which stimulated the subsequent considerable volume of research articles on the effectiveness of phototherapy for neonatal jaundice in both term and preterm infants. Current recommendations for artificial phototherapy are summarised elsewhere.3 We found no controlled trials comparing sunlight against either no treatment or artificial light treatment for jaundice. The use of sunlight appears to have resulted from anecdotal reports of its effectiveness4 rather than from rigorous medical evidence. And if the effectiveness of sunlight exposure for jaundice is unknown, so too is the incidence of potential risks to the neonate — for example, sunburn or photosensitivity.
There is insufficient evidence to support exposure to sunlight for the treatment of jaundice. The persistence of this practice 40 years after publication of a report on a single case series raises questions about the influence of evidence on the beliefs of professional healthcare workers. Based on our search results, a recommendation against using sunlight exposure to treat jaundice was distributed to Southern Health staff and used in an education program for midwives.
Centre for Clinical Effectiveness, Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Southern Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC.
Renea V Johnston, PhD, Research Officer; Jeremy N Anderson, MSc MD FRANZCP, Associate Professor, and Director.Monash Medical Centre, Moorabbin, VIC.
Cheryl Prentice, Women's Health Educator.Correspondence: Associate Professor Jeremy N Anderson, Level 1, E Block, Monash Medical Centre, Locked Bag 29, Clayton, VIC 3168. Jeremy.AndersonATmed.monash.edu.au
AntiSpam note: To avoid attracting spam mail robots, authors' email addresses on the MJA website are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address. We regret the inconvenience this entails. Lobby your government for more effective antispam regulations.
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au Print ISSN: 0025-729X Online ISSN: 1326-5377
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |