|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→ Previous article in this issue
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Pharmacology
→ More articles on Respiratory medicine
Letters
To the Editor: Our recent study of patients' priorities for asthma care1,2 provides additional evidence supporting the concerns of Wilson and Robertson in their editorial questioning the possible overuse of inhaled corticosteroids.3
We have reported a qualitative study of 62 individuals who presented to an emergency department at either a central city, suburban or rural hospital, in which we explored individuals' perceptions about their asthma, its care and the impact of asthma on their lives.1,2 We also asked participants to complete a questionnaire on the use of medications and sought to amplify this information by further probing the use of medications in our qualitative data collection.
Of the 82% of participants in our study currently using inhaled corticosteroid medication (51), 30% (16) were taking 1000 μg of fluticasone or equivalent daily and another 19% (10) were taking more than 1500 μg or equivalent. Current product information for fluticasone suggests a maximum dose of 1000 μg twice daily, whereas National Asthma Council (NACA) guidelines recommend that 500 μg fluticasone or equivalent daily may be the upper limit of useful effect.4,5
We also asked patients how long their medication lasted. Eleven (18%) stated that inhaled corticosteroid devices lasted three weeks or less. Use above recommended doses did not only occur for inhaled corticosteroids, but also for symptom controller medications. Twenty-four (35%) of the 31 (50%) patients receiving this medication reported that a device lasted three weeks or less, indicating use above usual recommended doses.
Most patients in our study voiced concerns about the cost of asthma and drug side effects; some adjusted their medication use to manage these issues.1 In such individuals, high use or overuse of preventive and controller medication would increase both costs and side effects, partly explaining these patients' concerns.
Doctors may be overprescribing inhaled corticosteroid medication because there is a discrepancy between dosages recorded in published drug information and newer recommendations for optimal inhaled corticosteroid dose.4,5 Our findings show that, in some patients, the risks associated with the use of inhaled corticosteroids are likely to be compounded by using them at higher doses than those recommended. Doctors need to be aware of this in managing patients with asthma who have severe symptoms, in whom overuse, rather than underuse, is likely to be a problem.
Alfred Hospital, CRC for Asthma and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.
Dianne P Goeman, MA, PostgradDipSoc, Research Officer, CRC for Asthma, and Department of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology; Michael J Abramson, PhD, FRACP, Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Central and Eastern Clinical School; Francis C K Thien, MD, FRACP, Physician, Department of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology; Jo A Douglass, MD, FRACP, Physician, Department of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology.Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital and the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC.
Susan M Sawyer, MD, FRACP, Associate Professor.Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University, Parkville, VIC.
Kay Stewart, PhD, BPharm(Hons), Senior Lecturer.School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC.
Rosalie A Aroni, PhD, Lecturer.Correspondence: Dr Jo A Douglass, Alfred Hospital, CRC for Asthma and Monash University, Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004. j.douglassATalfred.org.au
AntiSpam note: To avoid spam, authors' email addresses are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address.
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377