eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Letters

Use of the Internet by oncology patients: its effect on the doctor–patient relationship

Julia ML Brotherton, Stephen J Clarke and Susan Quine
MJA 2002 177 (7): 395

To the Editor: The possible impact of the Internet revolution has been much discussed.1-3 In two surveys, conducted in 1999 and 2001, we surveyed oncology patients from two teaching hospitals in central Sydney to explore the experience and impact of Internet use among Australian oncology patients.

In November 1999, a questionnaire was mailed to 240 eligible patients selected from 617 sequential registrations to the oncology units. Eligible patients were those who were alive, competent, had cancer, were of known address and whose attending medical officer was participating.

In the second survey, to obtain a more representative sample, we invited all oncology patients visiting the outpatient clinics over a three-month period (September to December 2001) to participate.

We received completed questionnaires from 142 patients (response rate, 59%) in 1999 and from 153 patients (number of refusals unknown) in 2001. Of these, 33% (47/142) in 1999 and 46% (70/153) in 2001 had accessed the Internet for information relating to their illness, either personally or through family and friends. In both surveys, most users accessed the Internet from home, the information sought was mainly in relation to treatment, and the most-visited Internet sites were those of cancer centres.

Patient perceptions of the impact of Internet-acquired information on their experience of cancer are summarised in the Box. Most patients viewed its impact as positive. The advantages of using the Internet reported by patients included its speed, convenience, privacy, currency, diversity of viewpoints, and usefulness as a support tool. Many reported that they had sought corroboration of Internet information with information from other sources, especially their doctor. Problems identified with the Internet were its impersonal nature, time costs, overabundance of information, and concerns about the discovery of inappropriate, inaccurate or distressing information. Most respondents emphasised that they were able to recognise these limitations, but, notwithstanding, considered the Internet a valuable resource. For example, one respondent wrote: "I felt my capacity to cope with the illness and treatment greatly improved because I learned enough from the Internet to challenge my oncologist and thereby learn to trust him and his advice."

Despite concerns expressed by many doctors, these oncology patients assessed impacts as either positive or neutral in overall influence. Increasing Internet use by patients and their families should not be viewed as a problem, but as an opportunity for patients and their treatment teams to work together, ensuring that patients have up-to-date information about their illness and its treatment and are aware that they are not alone in the fight against cancer.

Perceived influence of Internet-acquired information among oncology patients in 1999 and 2001

Better

No change

Worse

Question not answered


1999 survey (n = 47)

Relationship with doctor

12 (26%)

30 (64%)

0

5 (11%)

Discussions with doctor

20 (43%)

22 (47%)

0

5 (11%)

Treatment decisions

22 (47%)

19 (40%)

1 (2%)

5 (11%)

Coping with illness

26 (55%)

15 (32%)

1 (2%)

5 (11%)

2001 survey (n = 70)

Relationship with doctor

24 (34%)

34 (49%)

2 (3%)

10 (14%)

Discussions with doctor

42 (60%)

18 (26%)

1 (1%)

9 (13%)

Treatment decisions

37 (53%)

25 (36%)

0

8 (11%)

Coping with illness

32 (46%)

31 (44%)

1 (1%)

6 (9%)

  1. Van Der Weyden MB, Armstrong RM, Chew M. The communication revolution: winners and losers [editorial]. Med J Aust 1999; 171: 512. <PubMed>
  2. Coiera E. The Internet's challenge to health care provision [editorial]. BMJ 1996; 312: 3-4. <PubMed>
  3. Ferguson T. From patients to end users [editorial]. BMJ 2002; 324: 555-556. <PubMed>

(Received 3 Jun 2002, accepted 13 Jun 2002)

Oncology Unit, Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW.

Julia ML Brotherton, BMed(Hons) MPH(Hons) , Senior Resident Medical Officer (currently, Public Health Officer, Public Health Training and Development Unit, NSW Health).

Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW.

Stephen J Clarke, PhD FRACP, Senior Staff Specialist in Medical Oncology.

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW.

Susan Quine, MPH PhD, Associate Professor.

Correspondence: Dr Julia M L Brotherton, Public Health Training and Development Branch, NSW Health, LMB 961, North Sydney, NSW 2059. jbrotATdoh.health.nsw.gov.au

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2002 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377