|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→ Previous article in this issue
→ View contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Gastroenterology
Letters
High prevalence of coeliac disease in a population-based study from Western Australia: a case for screening?
To the Editor: I read with interest the recent article by Olynyk's group at Fremantle on the prevalence of coeliac disease in rural Western Australia.1
It is now increasingly realised that coeliac disease is underdiagnosed in adults because it may be clinically silent — but not necessarily asymptomatic. The symptoms, however, may be non-specific and not those traditionally associated with coeliac disease. In a recently reported small study from suburban Melbourne,2 I demonstrated that about 5% of patients (5/97) undergoing gastroscopy had coeliac disease based on small-bowel biopsy results. In only one of the patients was the disease suspected clinically.
I have used these figures to argue the case for routine duodenal biopsy at the time of gastroscopy, regardless of the indication. It is important to note that in my study none of the patients presenting with diarrhoea, and only one of six with anaemia, had coeliac disease — so that restricting biopsy to this group would have missed most patients with coeliac disease.
Timely diagnosis is important, as symptoms may be alleviated, presymptomatic nutritional deficiencies corrected, and the risk of cancer reduced by instituting a gluten-free diet. People presenting for gastroscopy represent a high-yield group for histological screening for coeliac disease in Australia.
(Received 17 Sep 2001, accepted 31 Oct 2001)
Brighton Gastroenterology Associates, Brighton, VIC.
Jeremy Ryan, FRACP, Gastroenterologist.Correspondence: Dr J Ryan, Brighton Gastroenterology Associates, Suite 5, 2 Church Street, Brighton, VIC 3186. jeremyATbrightongastro.com
In reply: High prevalence of coeliac disease in a population-based study from Western Australia: a case for screening?
In reply: We agree with Ryan that coeliac disease is common in the Australian community, with a prevalence of 1 in 250.1 Furthermore, all individuals positive for antiendomysial antibody who undergo small-bowel biopsy have typical features of coeliac disease.1 Clearly, there is a need to increase awareness relating to coeliac disease and determine appropriate screening strategies for our population.
Ryan suggests that patients presenting for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy represent a group in whom a high diagnostic yield of coeliac disease is expected. However, clinical expression of the disease is variable.1 In this setting, we believe that it is important to determine the cost-effectiveness of the various screening strategies before introducing broad-based screening.3 There is no doubt that treatment of symptomatic patients who present with coeliac disease is appropriate, but there are limited data on outcomes for asymptomatic patients who are discovered in population-based screening programs.
As we stated in our article, we recommend screening by serology and small-bowel biopsy if the clinical suspicion is high or the patient is in a high-risk group.
(Received 24 Oct 2001, accepted 31 Oct 2001)
Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, WA.
John K Olynyk, BMedSc, MD, FRACP, Associate Professor; Digby J E Cullen, MB BS, FRACP, Gastroenterologist; Judith A Collett, MB ChB, FRACP, Gastroenterologist; Dominic F Mallon, MB BS, FRACP, Clinical Immunologist; Chris J Hovell, MRCP, DM, Senior Registrar, Gastroenterology.Royal Defence Medical College, Gosport, UK.
Guy Vautier, BM, MRCP, Registrar, Gastroenterology.Correspondence: Associate Professor J K Olynyk, Fremantle Hospital, PO Box 480, Fremantle, WA 6959. jolynykATcyllene.uwa.edu.au
AntiSpam note: To avoid spam, authors' email addresses are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address.
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2002 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377