| |
Menopause is a natural event, and some women are understandably
reticent to take a drug therapy such as hormone replacement therapy
(HRT) for a "natural event". Women are also discouraged by the side
effects of HRT, particularly the small increased risk of breast
cancer associated with long term use.1 Thus, many women use herbal
medicines, supplements or dietary changes to try to manage the
symptoms of menopause, and some of the "natural alternatives" used
include extracts of red clover, soy, black cohosh, dong quai, vitamin
supplements (vitamin E in particular), and evening primrose oil.
From a medical perspective, the menopause presents two potential
problems. First, about a third of women will have significant
symptoms, such as severe flushes often associated with insomnia,
muscle aches and pains, formication, fatigue, palpitations and mood
swings. Second are the long term issues, in particular the prevention
and treatment of osteoporosis. Unfortunately, the first symptom of
osteoporosis is fracture, and over the past decade medical research
has taught us that clinical trials focusing on surrogate endpoints
such as bone density are not good enough. The gold standard clinical
bone trial measures fractures as the primary endpoint. However,
these studies are very expensive (typically around US$500 million),
and are well beyond the budget of most herbal or supplement companies.
Thus, herbal medicines may have a short term role in managing the
symptoms of menopause, rather than treating the long term aspects.
For most women the acute symptoms of menopause last 1-3 years and then
disappear, although around 10% of women have persistent flushes.
Around half will have symptomatic vaginal atrophy requiring topical
oestrogens, vaginal moisturisers or lubricants.
What is the evidence that these herbal medicines are efficacious and
safe? The findings by Davis and colleagues in this issue of the Journal add to the body of knowledge on herbal medicines and
menopause.2 Their carefully
constructed double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial,
which took great care in designing a placebo, found no evidence of
efficacy. Over 12 weeks there was a large placebo effect (of
approximately one third) and no significant difference between the
placebo and the herbal preparation.
The safety of Chinese herbal medicines has come under recent
scrutiny. Aristolochia fangchi is a Chinese herb that can
cause a progressive form of renal fibrosis and renal failure, and
recently it has been reported that 46% of those affected by
aristolochia nephropathy also had uroepithelial
carcinoma.3 This herb has no therapeutic
value, but is sometimes inadvertently replaced for other herbs such
as stephania or magnolia. The Therapeutic Goods Administration
recently banned aristolochia, but importers of Chinese herbal
medicines may not be aware that their product has been contaminated by
aristolochia. Clearly, some form of testing needs to be instituted.
It is also apparent that some herbal therapies have undesirable
hormonal effects. A popular, commercially available combination of
eight herbal medicines used to treat prostate disease in the United
States was found to have potent oestrogenic activity.4 Finally, some
herbals may interact with medical treatments, the best known example
being St John's wort, which inhibits monoamine oxidase
activity,5 and so can potentiate the
effect of pharmacological antidepressants.
The efficacy and safety of phytoestrogens was recently reviewed by
the North American Menopause Society and the data published as a
consensus opinion.6 In essence, it seems that
phytoestrogens are largely safe, although safety has not yet been
established among particular subgroups of patients (eg, women who
have had breast cancer). Basic science studies have shown that these
compounds have some effect on the cardiovascular system, improving
elasticity and compliance of large vessels and perhaps some effect on
the lipoprotein profile; however, the body of evidence at the moment
suggests that phytoestrogens have little, if any, beneficial effect
on bone metabolism, and, if there is an effect on menopausal symptoms,
it is mild and not much greater than that of placebo. In a double-blind
randomised controlled trial using dong quai for treating menopausal
symptoms,7 no therapeutic effect was
found and no oestrogenic effect on the endometrial thickness or on
vaginal epithelium was demonstrated. Similarly negative trials are
available for evening primrose oil8 and wild yam
cream.9 At present, the most
promising candidate for an effective herbal medicine for treating
menopausal symptoms is an extract of black cohosh, Remifemin
(Scinat, Australia), which has been subjected to two clinical
trials.10,11 Both trials showed a
significant effect on menopausal symptoms compared with a placebo
(typically, a 60% to 70% improvement over 12 weeks), with no
oestrogenic effect on vaginal epithelium, endocrine hormone
levels, or endometrial thickness. Interestingly, in Germany,
extract of black cohosh is commonly combined with St John's wort for
the treatment of menopausal symptoms.
Thus, currently available evidence indicates that most of the herbal
products that our patients take for menopausal symptoms are
ineffective, and some have serious questions concerning safety.
Davis and colleagues are to be congratulated for conducting a quality
double-blind randomised trial that adds to our knowledge on herbal
medicines and menopause. Doctors should make use of this knowledge
base, and be proactive in providing accurate information about both
HRT and herbal medicines (Box) to women seeking relief for their
menopausal symptoms.
John A Eden
Associate Professor, Reproductive Endocrinology
School of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine
University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
- Collaborative group on hormone factors in breast cancer. Breast
cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative re-analysis
of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 5,705 women with breast
cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 1997;
350: 1047-1059.
-
Davis SR, Briganti EM, Chen RQ, et al. The effects of Chinese
medicinal herbs on postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms of Australian
women. A randomised controlled trial. Med J Aust 2001; 174:
68-71.
-
Nortier JL, Martinez MCM, Schmeiser HH, et al. Urothelial
carcinoma associated with the use of a Chinese herb (Aristolochia
fangchi). N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1686-1692.
-
Di Paola RS, Shang H, Lambert GH, et al. Clinical and biological
activity of an estrogenic herbal combination (PC-SPES) in prostate
cancer. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 785-791.
-
Cott JM. In vitro receptor binding and enzyme inhibition by
Hypericum perforatum extract. Pharmacopsychiatry 1997; 30
Suppl 2: 108-112.
-
The role of isoflavones in menopausal health: Consensus opinion of
the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2000; 7:
215-229.
-
Hirata JD, Swiersz LM, Zell B, et al. Does Dong Quai have estrogenic
effects in postmenopausal women? A double blind placebo controlled
trial. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 981-986.
-
Chenoy R, Hussain S, Tayob Y, et al. Effective oral gamolenic acid
from evening primrose oil on menopausal flushing. BMJ 1994;
308: 501-503.
-
Komesaroff PA, Black CVS, Cable V. Effects of wild yam extract on
menopausal symptoms and hormonal and biochemical parameters
[abstract]. Australasian Menopause Congress, Auckland, October
1998.
-
Eden JA, Mackey R, McFarland K, et al. A pilot study of Remifemin for
menopausal symptoms [abstract]. Australasian Menopause Society
Congress, October 1997, abstract book: 97.
-
Stoll W. Phytopharmacon influences atrophic vaginal
epithelium: double blind study -- cimifuga vs estrogenic
substances. Therapeuticon 1987: 1; 23-31.
©MJA 2001
Make a comment
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2001 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|