| |
Lithium: While Melbourne psychiatrist John Cade both
discovered the antimanic effects of lithium and published
his findings in the Journal in the 1940s, its distinctive impact on
bipolar disorder management only crystallised in Australia in the
1970s after extensive developmental work, and with a mid-90s article
in Science estimating that, since 1970, lithium therapy had
saved the US economy alone US$145 billion in health costs.
Chlorpromazine: The introduction of this "major
tranquilliser" in 1952, described by David Healy (University of
Wales College of Medicine) as "the single most important
breakthrough in psychiatric treatment", had a dramatic impact on the
management of schizophrenia: for the first time some patients became
non-psychotic, and the acute management of schizophrenia improved
markedly.
Improving the practice of ECT: Electroconvulsive therapy is
still psychiatry's most powerful treatment for depression. Despite
major advances -- the introduction of anaesthetics and muscle
relaxants, stimulus dosing and electroencephalographic
monitoring -- the antipathy of patients (and the community) to ECT has
regrettably only slightly lessened.
Lessons from military psychiatry and refugee groups: Principles
developed between World War II and the Vietnam War (ie, making
psychiatric care immediately available "on the spot", and
communicating an expectation that recovery would occur) were
intrinsically important and diffused into other practice domains,
such as community psychiatry, and the management of post-traumatic
stress disorder.
Deinstitutionalisation: This misnomer was used to
describe the moving of patients in the 1960s from maxi-institutional
lives in large psychiatric hospitals to mini-institutional
existences in boarding houses and nursing homes, often to be even more
forgotten and neglected. Yet, we progressively recognised an old
principle -- that while risking "dying with one's rights on", people
value personal freedom above institutional existence. Forced
community assimilation also modified images of the "insane" to
softer, disability images.
Mainstreaming: Moving the care of psychiatric patients from the
Dickensian, isolated psychiatric institutions to general
hospitals helped bring Australian clinical psychiatry into general
medicine, reducing stigma and resulting in superior lines of
responsibility.
Malfeasance responses: Disturbing revelations of the Royal
Commission into Deep Sleep Therapy at the Chelmsford Private
Hospital, and the Queensland Commission of Inquiry into assault and
maltreatment of patients in the psychiatric ward of the Townsville
General Hospital, reports of sexual misconduct and other boundary
violations surfaced in the past 20 years. Grave community concerns
resulted in impressively non-defensive responses by the profession
and the monitoring authorities to redress such issues, including
increased legal involvement (and procedures) now intertwined with
public mental health services.
Formalised professional markers: The establishment in
1964 of a Royal College (the RANZCP) linking Australian and New
Zealand psychiatrists, and, in 1967, of a professional journal
(The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry),
together with the development of an innovative membership
examination, were markers of a move from a small network of individual
psychiatrists to a formalised grouping -- now one of the largest
professional medical specialties in the region.
Growth in Australian academic psychiatry: Once a "home
alone" model (eg, David Maddison, Professor of Psychiatry, Sydney
University, and Foundation Dean of the Newcastle University Medical
School being one of a small set of identifiable local produce) or "run
away from home" expatriate model (eg, local Adelaide lad, Aubrey
Lewis, dominating British academic psychiatry), now "home grown"
dominance is evident, with a disproportionately successful
Australian impact on international research publications, but also
a decrease in "critical attitude" by academics and an overvaluation
of quantitative research.
Clozapine: This "atypical" neuroleptic drug was produced in
1962, but only taken up in Australia in the past decade (because of its
side effect of agranulocytosis). Despite its monitoring
requirements and its expense, its wide prescribing by Australian
public mental health services is noteworthy. Its use gradually
causes a considerable number of patients with schizophrenia to
"normalise", and its capacity to restore suggested cognitive
limitations has changed our understanding of a disorder once called
"dementia praecox".
Growth of biological psychiatry and psychiatry as a
neuroscience: This movement has delivered striking results in
understanding the determinants of many major psychiatric
disorders, in establishing a dominant and successful research
paradigm, and in integrating psychiatry with medical research.
Caveats emerge from overly zealous or inappropriate application of
the model -- "the sin of biologism". At risk is rejection of
psychiatry's distinctive contribution to the practice of medicine
-- a pluralistic model, respecting and integrating (in formulation
and management) the multiple paradigms of sentient human
beings.
Detumescence of psychotherapy: Psychotherapy has been shrunk
less by failure to produce an evidence base, ad hominem
attacks and growth of alternative contenders (eg, cognitive
behavioural therapy) than by a loss of significance and relevance as
biological psychiatry has "Pac-Manned" the old Zeitgeist.
Psychotherapy requires revisionism, repositioning and more
pragmatic advocacy.
Introduction of "new" antidepressants and "atypical"
antipsychotic drugs: The selective serotonin reuptake
inhibitors (SSRIs) are not merely antidepressants, but
non-addictive "anti-worry" agents, with the potential to modify
"neurosis", a feat once thought impossible. The "atypical"
antipsychotic drugs may only be slightly more effective for treating
schizophrenia, but their more benign side-effect profile improves
quality of life and medication compliance.
Formulation of clinical depression as an economic problem: The
number of people with depression is not growing substantially,
despite historical formulations of depression as a response, a
disorder, an illness and a disease. Its recent reformulation as a
major economic cost due to its disabling effects, endorsed by the
World Bank, Harvard University and the World Health Organization,
provided the spin, attracting public, media, health department and
political attention.
Consumerism: At last year's RANZCP Conference, psychiatrists
danced in a congo line to music played by a band of consumers. As the
Convenor, Bob Barrett, observed: "It was a delicious sight indeed to
see psychiatrists dancing, for the first time, to the tune of the
patients." Consumers and their advocates have had a more difficult
row to hoe in psychiatry than in most other medical specialties, with
their contribution and impact on professional attitudes
humbling.
On doctors and nurses: Once non-psychiatrist doctors married
their hospitals and, on the rebound, the ward sister, who was ever able
to undertake ward rounds at home ("Are all the children in bed,
sister?"). Once psychiatrists were strange schizoid creatures (to
wit, "alienists"). Now doctors no longer marry nurses (most are
professors now) and psychiatrists are rugby-following,
tie-wearing, non-intellectual conservatives. As biological
psychiatry has reached its zenith, psychiatry is no longer as
attractive or distinctive to those seeking "different" medical
careers. The "magic" in the therapeutic process has gone -- magic that
could lead to foolishness and invite ridicule or, alternatively,
which imbued psychiatrists with a luminous sense of understanding.
Recruitment is down and there is a lack of plurality in the air. Has
psychiatry been mainstreamed away from its ineffable status? Has it
not become stale to medical student and graduates seeking a
specialty? How will it reconstitute itself above and beyond its
procrustean biological bed? The January 2051 issue of The Medical
Journal of Australia will detail the rollback.
Gordon B Parker
Professor and Head
School of Psychiatry University of New South Wales Prince of Wales
Hospital, Sydney, NSW
John H Ellard
Psychiatrist
Bead Lane Specialist Centre, Sydney, NSW
Above photograph. Ambulatory psychiatric patients, who have been put to bed in broad day-light, Callan Park Mental Hospital, Sydney, circa 1960. From the Report of the Royal Commission into Callan Park Mental Hospital, 1961. Crown copyright.
©MJA 2001
Make a
comment
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2001 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|