|
John B Ziegler and Rosemary A Ffrench
Let us not equivocate: a tragedy of unprecedented proportions is
unfolding in Africa. AIDS today in Africa is claiming more lives than
the sum total of all wars, famines and floods, and the ravages of such
deadly diseases as malaria . . . Economic growth is being undermined
and scarce development resources have to be diverted to deal with the
consequences of the pandemic . . . Decades have been chopped from life
expectancy and young child mortality is expected to more than double
in the most severely affected countries of Africa. AIDS is clearly a
disaster, effectively wiping out the development gains of the past
decades and sabotaging the future. Earlier this week we were shocked
to learn that within South Africa one in two, that is half, of our young
people will die of AIDS. The most frightening thing is that all of these
infections, which statistics tell us about, and the attendant human
suffering, could have been, can be, prevented. Something must be done
as a matter of the greatest urgency. And with nearly two decades of
dealing with the epidemic, we now do have some experience of what
works. -- Nelson Mandela1
MJA 2000; 173: 572-574
Prevention -
Mother-to-child transmission -
Vaccines -
Treatment strategies -
Hope -
References -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on Infectious diseases and parasitology
| Box 1: HIV in African countries, 1999
Box 2: Trends in mortality among children under five
|
Nelson Mandela's closing address to the conference1 was a welcome
contrast to the opening address by Thabo Mbeki, President of South
Africa, who disappointed delegates by failing to resolve their
concerns about his view that HIV does not cause AIDS. In his plenary
address, David Ho (Director, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New
York) noted that Mbeki would be judged harshly by history. Judge Ed
Cameron, a gay white South African living with HIV, in a moving
address, pointed out that his government had consistently
mismanaged the epidemic, and that he was only alive because his income
allowed him to purchase antiviral drugs not available to most South
Africans with AIDS.
|
|
|
Box 3: Probability of a Zimbabwean boy aged 15 dying before age 50
Box 4: Projected population structure, Botswana 2020
|
While news of the explosive spread of HIV in the Republic of South
Africa highlighted the urgency of effective preventive strategies,
there was relatively good news from some countries where decisive
action by pragmatic governments was paying off: the HIV infection
rate has stabilised at a relatively low level in Senegal; Uganda has
brought its estimated prevalence rate down to about 8% from a peak of
close to 14% in the early 1990s; Thailand's "100% condom use" campaign
among female sex workers has contributed to falling prevalence in
military recruits and antenatal clinic patients.2 In the opening
plenary session, Professor Roy Anderson (Director, Centre for the
Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Oxford) explained that
interventions to interrupt the spread of HIV in populations would
have relatively little impact once prevalence was high. Targeting
individuals engaging in high risk behaviours was only effective
early in an epidemic; unfortunately, few governments have been
prepared to invest resources in the early stages, when such efforts
are most cost-effective.
There was hope that relatively inexpensive strategies to prevent
heterosexual transmission of HIV might emerge from the conference.
Unfortunately, the results of a study of a vaginal microbicide
containing nonoxynol-9 among sex workers in Côte d'Ivoire showed a
higher infection rate in the experimental arm. This suggests that the
microbicide's detergent action caused ulceration that enhanced HIV
transmissibility.
|
| |
Amid the gloom of the inexorable spread of HIV in Africa and emerging
epidemics in Eastern Europe, delegates were virtually unanimous
that there should be no delay in implementing cost-effective
measures to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV,
especially with some drug companies offering to provide free drugs in
less developed countries. Data from a prospective observational
study in the USA showed that, with optimal maternal combination
antiretroviral treatment, the risk of mother-to-child
transmission falls to as low as 1%. In breast feeding populations
treated with only one drug the gains were less dramatic, but
nevertheless very impressive, with the potential to prevent the
infection of 25 000 infants a year in South Africa alone.
Data presented at the conference reinforced concern that the benefit
of perinatal antiviral therapy would be lost when mother-to-child
transmission occurred during subsequent breast feeding. However,
analysis of the HIVNET 012 trial (mother and infant each received a
single dose of nevirapine in labour and by Day 3, respectively) at 18
months showed that an absolute 8% reduction persisted despite
prolonged breast-feeding.3 These interventions
prevent only about a third of mother-to-child transmission, but they
point to cost-effective strategies relevant in resource-poor
settings. Implementation will be challenging; it was clear that many
women attending African antenatal clinics do not accept HIV
screening, do not return for results or do not accept antiretrovirals
if HIV positive; attrition rates of 80% were reported.
The role of breast feeding in perinatal transmission of HIV was firmly
established by a randomised, controlled trial in Nairobi,
Kenya.4 While observational data
suggested that exclusive breast feeding may be safer than mixed
feeding, bottle feeding provides the best protection against HIV
infection. The Nairobi investigators reported that the mode of
feeding did not affect survival to 24 months, either in the infected or
uninfected infants. Surprisingly, breast feeding was associated
with three times as much maternal mortality at two years as formula
feeding.
|
|
|
New candidate HIV vaccines presented at the conference provided some
hope for the future control of the pandemic. After the disappointing
immunogenicity of the recombinant protein vaccines, which were
designed to elicit antibody responses, it was thought that
strategies for eliciting cellular immunity, particularly
cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity, may be more successful. The
trials of vCP205 (a canarypox virus expressing HIV genes), both alone
or with a recombinant protein boost, showed very few vaccine
recipients with detectable CTL activity, and these few responses
were not sustained. However, it was shown that responses were
detected more frequently when vaccine recipients received higher
doses of vCP205, so more antigen expresssion may be necessary to
achieve the desired levels of immunity.
Results of a Phase II trial of the whole, killed HIV vaccine, Remune, in
HIV-positive individuals in Thailand were presented. The subjects
who received the therapeutic vaccine had a small but significant
increase in the CD4+ cell count (P = 0.05) of about 46
cells/µL, with increased antibody levels but no change in
viral load.
Probably the most controversial decision relating to HIV vaccines in
the past few years was to take the AIDSVAX recombinant envelope
protein into Phase III clinical trials (in Phase I/II trials the
vaccine did not induce antibodies that would neutralise circulating
strains of HIV). It was reported in Durban that enrolment in the Phase
III trials had been completed in Thailand (n = 2100) and the USA
(n = 5400). Efficacy data will not be available until early
2003.
There are many new vaccine concepts currently undergoing
preclinical testing and some impressive data were presented on
experiments in mice and macaques. Stephen Kent (Principal Research
Fellow, HIV Vaccines Laboratory, University of Melbourne)
presented further evidence that a prime-boost vaccine strategy
using DNA vectors, followed by fowlpox virus recombinant for
gag and pol simian immunodeficiency virus genes,
produced very high levels of cellular immunity in macaques, and that
these responses could be increased by the co-expression of the
cytokine gene IFN-g. This candidate vaccination strategy, for which
the University of New South Wales was recently awarded $27 million by
the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), will be tested in Phase
I/II human clinical trials in Australia within two years.
Another vaccine that has generated considerable interest was
presented by Dr Robert Johnson (Director, Alphavax, Professor of
Virology, University of North Carolina). The vector for the vaccine,
a Venezuelan equine encephalitis replicon, was shown to target
dendritic cells, one of the most powerful inducers of cellular immune
responses. Testing of this vaccine will begin in South Africa early
next year.
Dr B. Ensoli (Virologist, Instituto Superiore di Sanità,
Rome) also presented some convincing data on preclinical macaque
studies of a vaccine targeting immune responses to the tat
gene of HIV. She found that five of seven macaques were protected from
infection with pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus
challenge, and that these monkeys had developed good cellular immune
responses to tat protein. Clinical trials are due to begin with this
vaccine in Italy and Africa.
Thus, although HIV vaccines tested to date have produced somewhat
disappointing results, there was optimism at Durban that the next
generation of vaccines are promising.
|
| |
Clinicians and patients have recently become excited by the concept
of structured treatment interruptions, which have been suggested to
enhance immune responses to HIV while providing relief from the cost,
inconvenience and toxicity of complex antiretroviral regimens. Dr
Tony Fauci (Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland) presented a pilot study of five
patients selected because they had achieved undetectable viral
levels with potent therapy. They then interrupted therapy for one
week in two. During seven such interruption cycles the patients'
viral levels remained undetectable and their immune function was
preserved. However, because the cohort was small, the subjects
highly selected (with extremely well controlled viral replication)
and the period of observation was too short, the results did not
provide reassurance that such a strategy would not be associated with
the risk of induction of drug-resistant variants. It is thus much too
early to recommend this strategy in clinical practice.
|
|
|
Overall, the conference was hugely successful. Despite talk of
boycotts because of Mbeki's views, the conference was well attended.
The colourful national costumes of delegates, signage, art and craft
displays and street theatre all provided a celebratory atmosphere.
There was a mood of optimism that the problems of access to treatments
in resource-poor countries were at last beginning to be addressed.
Simple, cost-effective, population-based prevention strategies
are working in those countries which have implemented them. The hope
is that an affordable preventive vaccine that is active against
strains of HIV in areas of high prevalence is not too far off.
|
|
|
- Closing address by former President Nelson Mandela at the 13th
International AIDS Conference, 14 July 2000, Durban.
<http://www.aids2000.com/> Accessed 1 November 2000.
-
UNAIDS. Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic, June 2000.
<http://www.unaids.org/epidemic_update/report/index.html>
Accessed 1 November 2000.
-
Guay LA, Musoke P, Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal
single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of
mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET
012 randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 795-802.
-
Nduati R, John G, Mbori-Ngacha D, et al. Effect of breastfeeding and
formula feeding on transmission of HIV-1: a randomized clinical
trial. JAMA 2000; 283: 1167-1174.
|
| |
Department of Immunology, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
John B Ziegler, MD, FRACP, Associate Professor.
Rosemary A Ffrench, PhD, Senior Scientist, Research
Laboratory.
Reprints will not be available from the authors. Correspondence:
Associate Professor J B Ziegler, Department of Immunology, Sydney
Children's Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW 2031.
j.zieglerATunsw.edu.au
©MJA 2000
Make a
comment
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2000 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|
|
| 1: Seroprevalence of HIV in African countries in 1999 |
 |
| Over the last decade HIV has spread dramatically in sub-Saharan
Africa, the fastest increases in prevalence occurring in Eastern and Southern
Africa. (Reproduced by kind permission of the Joint United Nations Progamme
on HIV [UNAIDS].) |
|
|
| Back to text |
| |
| |
| Back to text |
| |
| |
| Back to text |
| |
|
| 4: Projected population structure with and without the AIDS epidemic,
Botswana 2020 |
 |
| The population chimney graph shows the dramatic impact
that AIDS is predicted to have on the structure of the population of Botswana,
where over a third of the 775 000 adults are now infected with HIV. The
red pyramid shows the population structure as it would be in the absence
of an AIDS epidemic. More children would be born (because more mothers would
survive and remain fertile throughout their reproductive years) and fewer
would have died because they acquired the virus from their mothers. Far
fewer young adults would die before old age. The yellow areas show that
the burden of AIDS will be greatest in children and in the most economically
productive years of adult life. The implications of this change in population
structure are shocking. The United States Census Bureau projects that in
20 years' time there will be more adults in their 60s and 70s in Botswana
than in their 40s and 50s. This is based on the assumption that patterns
of new infection will not change greatly over the next decade; however,
as changes in future infection rates will principally affect men and women
under 40 in 2020, the demographic chimney pattern for older adults is hardly
affected by this assumption. The "missing adults" -- men and women who should
have reached their 40s and 50s in 2020 -- are now in their 20s and 30s, although
some have already died. Many more are already infected with HIV and will
die before they reach their 50s.2 (Source: US Census Bureau, World Population
Profile 2000.) |
|
|
| Back to text |
|