|
Responding to Crisis
Malaria in the Australian Defence Force during and after
participation in the International Force in East Timor (INTERFET)
Scott J Kitchener, Alyson M Auliff and Karl H Rieckmann
Malaria in Australian Defence Force members has been far more common
in East Timor than in other recent overseas deployments. By six months
after all 5500 members of the International Force in East Timor had
returned to Australia, 267 malaria infections had been reported to
the Army Malaria Institute. Only 64 of those affected had their first
clinical episode during their 4-5 months in East Timor, and about
two-thirds of these infections were caused by Plasmodium
falciparum. The remaining 212 soldiers developed their first
symptoms after returning to Australia, and all but two infections
were caused by P. vivax. After treatment, 44 soldiers had
relapses of their vivax infections; 11 had a second relapse and two had
a third relapse. These findings raise several issues about
prevention and management of malaria in the ADF.
MJA 2000; 173: 583-585
→ Other articles have cited this article
Antimalarial measures -
High malaria rates in two battalions -
Notification of malaria infections -
Malaria infections with onset in East Timor -
Malaria infections with onset in Australia -
Parasite resistance to drugs? -
References -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on Infectious diseases and parasitology
| |
On 12 September 1999, President Habibie of Indonesia invited an
international peace-keeping force to help restore peace in East
Timor after significant civil unrest. The United Nations Security
Council Recommendation 1264 (15 September 1999) directed the
formation of an International Force in East Timor (INTERFET). On 20
September, lead elements of INTERFET from the Australian Defence
Force (ADF) landed in Dili and were soon followed by approximately
5500 ADF personnel assigned to serve in different parts of East Timor.
INTERFET concluded on 23 February 2000, when most ADF personnel came
under the command of the Peace Keeping Force of the United Nations
Transition Administration for East Timor (UNTAET).
|
| |
ADF personnel used various personal protection measures against
mosquitoes, including insect repellents and permethrin-treated
mosquito-nets. Preventive medicine units also carried out mosquito
control measures. Personnel were given doxycycline (100 mg daily)
for prophylaxis, starting one or two days before departure for East
Timor and continuing for two weeks after return to Australia. Weekly
doses of mefloquine (250 mg) were used as an alternative if
doxycycline prophylaxis was not tolerated or contraindicated. In
addition, terminal prophylaxis with primaquine (7.5 mg three times
daily) was given for two weeks after return to Australia. In general,
chemoprophylaxis was not taken under supervision.
|
| |
On 23 October 1999 -- approximately one month after deployment -- the
first malaria infection was diagnosed in a soldier serving with the
Second Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment (2RAR). During
the four months of the battalion's deployment on the northern border
region, mainly during the wet season, 17 members of the battalion
developed malaria (monthly rate, 0.71%). Most of these cases were
traced to exposures in Batugade (see Box 1). The Third Battalion
(3RAR), deployed to the Oecussi (Ambino) enclave for five months,
reported 24 cases of malaria (monthly rate, 0.73%). These malaria
attack rates were the highest observed during the ADF involvement in
INTERFET. Based on data from ADF units deployed to other areas of East
Timor, other high risk areas were the mouth of the Komoro River in Dili
(near the international airport) and the southern border regions
near Suai.
Within 7-8 months after returning to Australia, a further 127
soldiers from 2RAR and 3RAR had developed malaria. Combined with the
41 cases with onset overseas, this equates to nearly three (2.96) of
every 100 soldiers from these two battalions acquiring malaria for
every month's deployment to East Timor. This rate is higher than that
experienced by Australian military forces deployed recently to
Southeast Asia and Africa1 and Bougainville
(unpublished), but lower than that observed during some military
deployments to Papua New Guinea.2
|
| |
That malaria was a health problem was obvious during the five-month
duration of INTERFET, and this became even more noticeable after the
return of troops to Australia. Clinical episodes of malaria were
reported to the Central Malaria Register of the ADF, which is managed
by the Army Malaria Institute (AMI). The AMI records clinical and
epidemiological data, and, whenever possible, confirms the
diagnosis by microscopic examination of blood films or polymerase
chain reaction (PCR).
|
| |
During deployment of the entire Australian contribution to
INTERFET, 64 ADF members developed malaria while in East Timor (Box
2a). About two-thirds of these infections were caused by
Plasmodium falciparum and the remainder by P. vivax.
This 2:1 ratio reflects the relative prevalence of these two species
in the local communities,3 and suggests that there was
inadequate compliance with doxycycline prophylaxis or that there
were other factors resulting in lower drug concentrations, such as
drug deterioration under adverse environmental conditions or
reduced bioavailability.
The falciparum infections were treated with either a one-day course
of mefloquine, or quinine (3 days) combined with doxycycline (10
days). One patient tolerated mefloquine poorly and received
atovaquone and proguanil (3 days). None of the patients had a
recurrence of clinical symptoms and were presumably cured of their
infections.
The vivax infections were treated with a combination of chloroquine
(3 days) and primaquine (14 days). All affected patients responded
well to treatment, but a few had a recurrence of clinical symptoms and
parasitaemia (relapse) a few weeks to months later (Box 2b).
|
| |
Many more malaria infections had their onset after soldiers had left
East Timor, with the first clinical episode of malaria occurring in
212 ADF members after their return to Australia (Box 2a). They all had
vivax malaria, except for two soldiers who developed falciparum
malaria within two weeks of their return. This indicates that
doxycycline prophylaxis effectively prevented the development of
the blood stages of P. vivax, but that dormant parasites
(hypnozoites) in the liver reactivated, entered the bloodstream,
and initiated acute attacks of malaria after doxycycline
prophylaxis was discontinued. Such initial episodes of vivax
malaria could occur many months after return to Australia, with most
ADF personnel involved in INTERFET leaving East Timor between
December and March 2000 (Box 2b). A few more initial infections will
undoubtedly emerge up to 12 months or longer after return from East
Timor.
It was obvious that terminal prophylaxis with primaquine had not been
successful in eradicating all the residual hepatic parasites. As
primaquine is the only drug capable of eliminating such parasites,
the 210 patients hospitalised with vivax malaria received
primaquine again (22.5 mg or 30 mg daily) in addition to a standard
course of chloroquine (3 days). Compliance with treatment courses
was undoubtedly better than with terminal prophylaxis.
Forty-four soldiers had relapses 22-180 days (median, 77 days) after
treatment. Although most soldiers were cured after a second course of
chloroquine and primaquine, 11 had a second relapse 28 to 157 days
(median, 82 days) after treatment and two had a third relapse 145 to 159
days after the third course of treatment. Apart from the distress
caused by these recurrent acute episodes of malaria, the overall
effect on operational capability was quite substantial. Clearly,
there is an urgent need for more effective malaria prophylaxis.
|
| |
Doxycycline has proven to be very effective in the past for
prophylaxis of both falciparum and vivax malaria. In combination
with any rapid-acting drug, it also cures falciparum infections
provided it is taken for 7-10 days. All the falciparum infections in
East Timor were cured after treatment with doxycycline, indicating
that the parasites had not developed resistance to doxycycline.
Primaquine tolerance is a well-recognised phenomenon in Papua New
Guinea2 and other Melanesian
countries, but it has not been well documented in East Timor. The
surprisingly large number of soldiers who developed vivax malaria
after returning to Australia obviously had their infections
suppressed effectively by doxycycline while they were in East Timor.
Their delayed malaria attacks after their return were the result of
either deteriorating drug compliance or primaquine-tolerant
hepatic parasites. The fact that 44 (21%) of the 210 patients with
vivax malaria had a relapse of their infections (a quarter on more than
one occasion), under more closely supervised drug administration,
indicates that primaquine-tolerant parasites are present in East
Timor.
Efforts currently being made to reduce the many malaria casualties in
East Timor are summarised in Box 3.
|
|
|
- Shanks GD, Roessler P, Edstein MD, Rieckmann KH. Doxycycline for
malaria prophylaxis in Australian soldiers deployed to United
Nations Missions in Somalia and Cambodia. Milit Med 1995;
160: 443-445.
-
Rieckmann KH, Yeo AET, Davis DR, et al. Recent military experience
with malaria chemoprophylaxis. Med J Aust 1993; 158:
446-449.
-
World Health Organization. East Timor epidemiological profile,
September 1999 <http://www.who.ch/eha/> (accessed
November 2000).
|
| |
Army Malaria Institute, Gallipoli Barracks, QLD.
Scott J Kitchener, FAFPHM FACTM, Officer Commanding
Clinical Field Section; Alyson M Auliff, BSc(Hons),
Scientific Officer, Clinical Field Section; Karl H Rieckmann,
MD, Director.
Reprints: Major S Kitchener, AMI, Gallipoli Barracks,
Milpo, QLD 4152. scott.kitchenerATdefence.gov.au
©MJA 2000
Make a
comment
Other articles have cited this article:
Donnetta M Charles, Julie Hart, Wendy A Davis, Eleanor Sullivan, Gary K Dowse and Timothy M E Davis. Notifications of imported malaria in Western Australia,
1990–2001: incidence, associated factors and chemoprophyl Med J Aust 2005; 182 (4):164-167. [Public Health] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/182_04_210205/cha10457_fm.html>
Scott J Kitchener, Peter E Nasveld, Robin M Gregory and Michael D Edstein. Mefloquine and doxycycline malaria prophylaxis
in Australian soldiers in East Timor Med J Aust 2005; 182 (4):168-171. [Public Health] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/182_04_210205/kit10802_fm.html>
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2000 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|
| 1: East Timor |
 |
Map showing Batugade and the Oecussi (Ambino) enclave, identified as sources of infection for the Secound and Third Battalions, Royal Australian Regiment. |
|
|
| Back to text |
| |
|
|
| Back to text |
| |
|
| |
| 3: Improvement of malaria control measures |
- Increased vigilance for malaria in the border areas of East Timor,
and continued surveillance of malaria infections after redeployment
to Australia;
- Assessment of the effectiveness of personal protection measures and
remedial measures to improve compliance;
- Evaluation of higher doses of primaquine for eradicating parasites
from the liver; and
- Appraisal of the effectiveness of alternative control measures, including
new prophylactic drug regimens.
|
|
|
| Back to text |
| |
| Plasmodium falciparum |
Plasmodium vivax |
 |
 |
|
|
|