Click Here!

  eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Editorial

Neglect of bereavement care in general hospitals

A family-centred approach is needed in caring for the bereaved in our community

MJA 2000; 173: 456

  Technological advances in medicine during the 20th century, while achieving marvellous gains in combating disease, have made care of the dying harder.1 At the same time, care of the bereaved has drastically deteriorated with the relative loss of family medicine and increasing emphasis on specialist care.2 Such neglect has occurred particularly in general hospitals in Australia, in which 38 000 deaths (30% of total deaths annually in Australian hospitals) occur each year.3 The morbidity resulting from bereavement contributes substantially to healthcare costs. We are challenged to redress this serious problem by adopting a more family-centred model of care, which should begin to operate from the time of first admission of any index patient.

The continual pressure on acute general hospital units can easily lead to neglect of the bereaved, unless the unit leader routinely seeks feedback on bereavement follow-up at multidisciplinary meetings. Fleeting contact with several care providers does not easily permit relationships to become established between staff and patients' relatives. Clearly, continuity of care established with relatives before death could facilitate ease of support following the patient's death.

In their article about death in the emergency department (ED) in this issue of the Journal, Williams and colleagues offer guidelines for dealing with bereaved relatives.4 They describe a sensitive approach to the communication of news of tragic death; care of the family as they view the deceased's body and express their grief; and a follow-up program that involves comforting bereaved relatives and maintaining contact with them. This model utilises each member of the multidisciplinary team and reaches out to involve the general practitioner. It promotes continuity of care and takes medical practice beyond the usual patient-centred approach to include the wider community.

Bereavement support is indeed a broad community responsibility. Medical resources should be directed to bereaved people at greatest risk of a severe grief reaction, including those for whom the death was unexpected or in some way shocking; those who had an ambivalent or over-dependent relationship with the deceased; those particularly vulnerable to depression or psychiatric illness; and those likely to have poor support networks.5 Careful inquiry from a practitioner adopting a family-centred model of care can help to determine whether particular family members are at high risk. The GP is well placed to sustain regular contact with "at risk" individuals over subsequent months and intervene if complications develop.

The manner of death, including death by suicide or homicide, may be associated with stigma, the horror of violence, and a pressing need for relatives to understand the sequence of events leading up to the death.6 In such instances, it is vital that GPs meet with family members to address these issues and that they continue to support the family, referring individuals to psychological or family therapy services if appropriate.

Untimely and unexpected death occurs not only in the ED, but also regularly within coronary and intensive care units, and occasionally in obstetric and surgical settings, where the emphasis is on repair and rehabilitation.7 The goal of care in such teams is restitutive,8 and hope of recovery is high. Any relationships between staff and relatives are likely to be brief and tentative. Nevertheless, such units need to have established guidelines, along the lines of those outlined by Williams and colleagues, for responding to unexpected death.

Other units (eg, renal, oncology or geriatric services) deal with patients who have chronic illness, with slow but steady progression, sometimes leading to an acceptance of dying in a courageous or heroic manner.9 Emphasis here should be on quality of life and relief of specific symptoms. Generally, staff of these units build good relationships with their patients' relatives and provide a bereavement follow-up program after death.

Over the past decade, palliative care services have set up bereavement follow-up programs similar to that described by Williams and colleagues for the ED. They have discovered the importance of a structured approach,10 involving selection of the most appropriate staff member (based on continuity of care) to sustain contact during bereavement, and provision of a written record of outcome.

Hospice care has sought to redress the neglect of the dying that can occur when hospitals are focused primarily on the fight for life. The hospice tradition promotes a healthy acceptance of the dying process, encouraging doctors to listen to and care compassionately for the dying and their families. This healing intent must be extended to embrace the care of bereaved relatives, not only in the context of palliative care, but in all other areas.

A major cultural shift is needed in many Australian hospitals today to strive for better care of the bereaved in our community. The guidelines proposed by Williams and colleagues4 serve as a model that warrants adoption by the whole hospital system.

David W Kissane
Professor, and Director of Palliative Medicine
Centre for Palliative Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC

  1. Seale C. Constructing death. The sociology of dying and bereavement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  2. Parkes CM. Bereavement: studies of grief in adult life. 3rd ed. Madison, Connecticut: International Universities Press, 1998.
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australia now -- a statistical profile. Population, deaths. Canberra: ABS, 2000.
  4. Williams AG, O'Brien DL, Laughton KJ, Jelinek GA. Improving services to bereaved relatives in the emergency department: making healthcare more human. Med J Aust 2000; 173: 480-483.
  5. Kissane DW. Grief and the family. In: Bloch S, Hafner J, Harari E, Szmukler G, editors. The family in clinical psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1994: 71-91.
  6. Hassan R. Suicide in Australia. In: Kellehear A, editor. Death and dying in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2000: 190-207.
  7. Field MJ, Cassel CK, editors. Committee on Care at the End of Life, Institute of Medicine. Approaching death: improving care at the end of life. Washington: National Academy Press, 1997.
  8. Frank A. The wounded storyteller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  9. Field D. Awareness and modern dying. Mortality 1996; 1: 255-266.
  10. Kissane DW. A model of family-centered intervention during palliative care and bereavement: focused family grief therapy (FFGT). In: Baider L, Cooper CL, Kaplan De-Nour A, editors. Cancer and the family. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley, 2000: 175-197.

©MJA 2000
Make a comment

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  


Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further reproduction or distribution of the articles should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For permission, contact the Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".

<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/> © 2000 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate your comments.