|
Olympic Games
Newer drugs used to enhance sporting performance
Michael C Kennedy
MJA 2000; 173: 314-317
Controversy surrounding drug use in sport makes this a difficult area
for rigorous research. However, it is striking that what data there
are on drugs currently used for performance enhancement rarely
indicate any clear benefit.
Testosterone precursors -
5 Alpha-dihydrotestosterone -
Clenbuterol -
Erythropoietin -
Insulin -
Growth hormone -
Insulin-like growth factors -
-Hydroxy- -methylbutyrate -
Conclusions -
Disclaimer -
Acknowledgements -
References -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on Sports medicine
| |
Historically, many different drugs have been used in attempts to
enhance sporting performance. Strychnine, cocaine, heroin and
ethyl alcohol were in common use at the turn of the century, but they
were later supplanted by amphetamines, pseudoephedrines and
anabolic steroids. Caffeine has remained popular for over a hundred
years and anabolic steroids have been in steady use since the early
1960s.1
Nevertheless, the magic elixir of sporting performance remains
elusive. The search continues in the face of unsatisfactory results,
adverse reactions and drug control efforts within sport and through
legislation. With advances in drug development there is also the
further hope that new drugs will be difficult for laboratories to
detect.
My aim in this article is to provide a brief review of some of the newer
drugs that have become popular over about the past 10 years,
providing, where possible, doses used, their International Olympic
Committee (IOC) status, their adverse reaction profiles, and
methods used to detect them. The best known of these newer drugs are the
testosterone precursors, dihydrotestosterone, clenbuterol,
growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor, insulin,
erythropoietin and -hydroxy- -methylbutyrate.
Unfortunately, there are few published data quantifying the present
use of these drugs in Australia. The doses of drug taken are difficult
to ascertain -- those in this article have been obtained largely from
Internet searches.
There are many difficulties in deciding whether a drug actually
enhances sporting performance. While a laboratory study may find a
small change in strength or some other physiological parameter such
as maximal oxygen uptake, this may not translate to increased
performance in actual competition.
When considering adverse reaction profiles it must be remembered
that most of the drugs mentioned here are not subjected to the
postmarketing surveillance procedures used for newly released
therapeutic drugs. It is necessary to rely almost entirely on reports
by interested professionals or projections made from the known
pharmacological properties of the drug. There are no data on the
effects of these agents on developing fetuses, children or
adolescents.
|
Testosterone precursors | |
The pathway of testosterone synthesis is shown in the Box.
Testosterone precursors are taken with the aim of increasing
testosterone levels without the need for testosterone injections,
and also in the hope of foiling current drug detection methods. The
most popular agents in this group of drugs are
dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione.
Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been the subject of a recent
comprehensive review in the Journal.2 This drug is a weak androgen
that circulates in two interconvertible forms -- unconjugated DHEA
and DHEA sulfate, the latter in higher concentration. The
physiological role of DHEA remains unclear. Concentrations fall
with age and it has been trialled as therapy in a wide variety of
conditions with little evidence of a positive effect, apart from
increasing well-being and sexuality (term derived from a
psychometric questionnaire) in women with adrenal
insufficiency.3 While one study showed an
increase in lean body mass, this was not confirmed in another. There is
one study of the effects of DHEA on strength and aerobic performance; a
comparison of DHEA, androstenedione and placebo in 40 healthy
middle-aged men did not show any advantage of the steroid precursors
over placebo.4 The effects of long-term,
high-dose administration are unknown.2 In Australia, there has been
one high-profile case involving a footballer receiving DHEA for
chronic fatigue syndrome. After legal argument, the player was
allowed to continue playing if he ceased taking the drug.2
Androstenedione and related compounds, such as 5-androstenedione,
4-androstenediol, 5-androstenediol, 19-norandrost-4-enedione,
19-norandrost-5-enediol and 19-norandrost-4-enediol, have
become extremely popular in the United States since baseball home run
record holder Mark McGwire admitted using
androstenedione.5 As with DHEA,
androstenedione is used in an attempt to increase testosterone
concentrations.
There is a well-conducted, double-blind controlled trial
evaluating the effects of androstenediones on endocrine function,
body composition and strength. In the first part of this study, 10
people received 100 mg of androstenedione orally for two days, and
then received the same regimen of placebo one week later; the effects
on serum testosterone, luteinising hormone (LH) and
follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured. In the second
part of the study, 300 mg of androstenedione or placebo was given in a
cyclical dosing regimen over eight weeks to 20 men, only one of whom had
any previous experience in resistance training. Strength was
assessed by a number of resistance exercises and training was
standardised over eight weeks. Compared with placebo,
androstenedione did not increase concentrations of free or total
testosterone and did not increase strength or alter lean body mass,
but it did increase serum concentrations of oestradiol. Levels of
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) became depressed in the treatment
group compared with pretreatment levels. While this study used lower
doses than are often used by athletes, these results suggest it is
unlikely that androstenedione increases sporting
performance.6
While it did not evaluate sporting performance, one study found that
300 mg of oral androstenedione given to 14 volunteers caused a
significant rise in testosterone levels.7 There was also considerable
individual variation in the levels, which suggests variations in
metabolism of the drug.
Dose: Up to 1100 mg/day of DHEA; athletes take doses of
androstenedione which exceed the dose used in these studies.
IOC status: Banned (but androstenedione is not
banned in major league American baseball).
Adverse reactions: There do not appear to be any
immediate clinically detectable adverse effects. Long term
administration of testosterone precursors will reduce HDL, and so
predispose some athletes to coronary disease. Elevated levels of
oestrone and oestradiol could have effects on malignant processes
and also cause gynaecomastia.
Detection: The testosterone/epitestosterone
(T/E) ratio in urine is used to detect exogenous testosterone. A ratio
greater than 6:1 is usually taken as an indication of misuse. DHEA has
been reported to increase the T/E ratio in some, but not all, studies.
Doses as low as 50 mg for three days can alter the ratio to more than 6:1 in
some, but not all, individuals, suggesting there may be individual
differences in the metabolism of this drug.8 In addition to the T/E ratio
there has been considerable progress in detecting exogenous
testosterone by measuring the ratio of the carbon isotopes
12C
and 13C. This method may become
one of the major means of detecting steroid misuse in the near future.
|
5 Alpha-dihydrotestosterone | |
5 Alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) is the principal active
metabolite of testosterone and has a greater binding affinity to the
androgen receptor than testosterone. It transforms more readily to
the steroid receptor complex and dissociates from this complex more
slowly than does testosterone. It is used to enhance performance in a
variety of sports.
DHT has been a licensed pharmaceutical in some countries and gained
considerable prominence when 11 Chinese swimmers were found to have
taken the drug in the 1994 Asian Games in Tokyo. There are no published
data showing there is any effect on sporting performance.
Dose: Probably greater than 25 mg twice daily,
percutaneously.
IOC status: Banned.
Adverse reactions: While there are few data, it is
reasonable to expect that typical androgenic adverse effects such as
baldness in males, hirsutism in females and acne will occur.
Detection: DHT does not alter the T/E ratio, but it can
be detected by determining the ratios of other steroids to
epitestosterone and LH.9
|
|
|
Clenbuterol |
Clenbuterol is a 2-agonist
with a half-life of 35 hours which came to prominence during the
Barcelona Olympics.10,11 It is marketed in some
countries as a bronchodilator and is not approved for human use in
Australia.
There are excellent data showing that other 2-agonists
allow asthmatic athletes to compete at international level, but few
showing that these drugs improve strength or aerobic performance in
people who do not have asthma. In animals large doses of clenbuterol
have been shown to increase lean body mass.12 Athletes usually take
clenbuterol to increase muscle mass, and it is taken orally in
conjunction with anabolic steroids. There are no data showing
clenbuterol alters athletic performance or strength in healthy
people.
Dose: Up to 60-120 mg/day may be taken in cycles of 6-12
weeks' duration.
IOC status: Banned.
Adverse reactions: Clenbuterol will produce a
predictable tremor and tachycardia. There are anecdotal reports of
sudden death in two bodybuilders.13
Detection: Clenbuterol can be easily detected in
urine by mass spectroscopy.
|
|
|
Erythropoietin |
Autologous and homologous transfusions, commonly known as blood
doping, have been used to enhance performance since the 1970s. This
practice received considerable prominence when some members of the
1984 United States Olympic cycling team confessed to receiving
transfusions. Endurance athletes experience very complex
physiological adaptations such as an increase in red cell mass and a
decrease in haemoglobin concentration resulting from a
considerable increase in plasma volume. It appears that aerobic
performance is improved by blood transfusion in some
circumstances.14
The ready availability of synthetic erythropoietin (r-HuEPO)
scandalised the 1998 Tour de France.15 This substance has been
commercially available since that time and has essentially replaced
transfusion as a means of blood doping. There is no doubt that rHuEPO
can enhance physical performance in patients with anaemia secondary
to renal failure. Both haemoglobin levels and physical performance
were shown to have increased in 24 young healthy males who received
r-HuEPO for seven weeks.16 As it seems to be widely
accepted that r-HuEPO will increase aerobic performance, it is not
surprising that it is widely misused in endurance sport. As the
haematocrit may be measured to detect misuse, plasma expanders are
sometimes used to avoid detection.
Dose: Often three injections per week for six weeks.
Vials contain varying concentrations, so doses are likely to vary
considerably.
IOC status: Blood transfusions and r-HuEPO are both
banned.
Adverse reactions: As dehydration will increase
blood viscosity during any endurance event, the most serious adverse
reactions to r-HuEPO seem likely to result from vascular events
caused by thromboses when blood viscosity is markedly increased.
However, there are no reported cases of this in the refereed
literature. Sporting magazines and the lay press have reported
deaths allegedly caused by r-HuEPO. These deaths have not occurred
during exercise, but during periods of physical inactivity or
sleep.17
Detection: Difficult because of its short half-life
of 5-6 hours and the long duration of action on erythropoiesis.
r-HuEPO differs from the endogenous hormone in its carbohydrate
moiety, and this confers different physicochemical properties,
thus allowing the potential for it to be detected in both blood and
urine.18 Alternative methods of
detection rely on measurement of various haematological and
ferruginous parameters in capillary samples of blood.19,20 At present
there are a number of studies under way to ascertain which of these
methods would be fair to athletes and also stand up to the rigours of
legal argument in the setting of a tribunal. On 1 August 2000, the
Scientific Committee of the IOC approved a test based on urine and
blood analysis (N Vance, Programme Manager, Doping Control, Sydney
2000 Olympics, personal communication).
|
|
|
Insulin |
Insulin is an anabolic hormone, so it is not surprising that it has
become popular in power sports. There are no studies showing an
enhancement of sporting performance and, not surprisingly, there
are reports of hypoglycaemia in users.21
Insulin is often used in association with anabolic steroids.
Clearly, medical practitioners need to be mindful of this area of
misuse should unknown patients request renewal of a prescription for
insulin. Insulin is also available in Australia without a
prescription if the patient is prepared to pay the over-the-counter
price, so this caution also applies to dispensing pharmacists.
Dose: 2-15 U 20-40 minutes after exercise with a
carbohydrate load, or as 10 U twice daily.22
IOC status: Allowed for athletes with
insulin-dependent diabetes.
Adverse reactions: Hypoglycaemia.
Detection: There are numerous analytical methods of
detecting insulin. No criteria have been set for insulin misuse in
sport.
|
Growth hormone | |
Growth hormone (GH) has become popular since the advent of
DNA-derived production removed concerns about human pituitary
sources and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Athletes usually take it in
association with anabolic steroids. There is no doubt about the
anabolic effects of the hormone -- the increase in muscle strength in
hypopituitary patients receiving treatment and observations that
the hormone is released in response to exercise. There is also no doubt
that legitimate sources are being diverted into the sporting
area.23 In spite of its widespread
use there are no data showing an enhancement of sporting performance.
One well conducted investigation in experienced training
weightlifters showed that 14 days of growth hormone use did not alter
protein synthesis or breakdown.24 Another study of
exercising elderly men did not show any increase in
strength.25 While muscle protein is
probably not altered, a placebo-controlled trial showed that lean
body weight increased as a result of decreasing body fat. In that study
supraphysiological doses of GH were given thrice weekly for six weeks
to eight progressive-resistance weight-trained
athletes.26
Dose: 2.1 U 2-4 times per week. Cycle length varies
depending on availability, but is usually about six weeks.
IOC status: Banned.
Adverse reactions: Clinical acromegaly would be
expected, yet a case has yet to be reported in the refereed literature.
Detection: Difficult to detect in urine. The
synthetic form can be detected by measurement of isoform ratios in
serum,27 as recombinant GH
manufacture produces only one isoform, while the pituitary releases
principally the single 191 amino acid polypeptide chain with a
molecular mass of 22 kDa, a smaller 20 kDa form and some smaller and
larger forms.
|
Insulin-like growth factors | |
Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) production is principally
regulated by GH. IGF is an important factor for some of the actions of
GH, such as its anabolic and growth-promoting effects, but not its
effects on carbohydrate and lipid levels, which are a direct action of
GH on a GH receptor.28,29 At present there are
few established clinical applications for IGF and, in sport, it is
probably used less than growth hormone. There are no studies of IGF in
sporting performance.
Dose: Unknown.
IOC status: Banned.
Adverse reactions: No data from athletes. High-dose
intravenous use causes hypoglycaemia; hypophosphataemia causing
hypotension and asystole has been reported. Longer-term effects are
parotidomegaly, facial pain, hand oedema, sinus tachycardia,
gynaecomastia, Bell's palsy and avascular necrosis of the femoral
head.28
Detection: Detecting IGF in urine is difficult and,
as for GH, determining compound ratios in serum may be a means of
detecting misuse.
|
-Hydroxy- -methylbutyrate | |
Infusions of some branched-chain amino acids will decrease protein
breakdown in postoperative patients. This is probably the result of
an inhibitory action on protein metabolism by metabolites of leucine
such as a-ketoisocaproate.30 More recently, its
further metabolite, -hydroxy- -methylbutyrate
(HMB), has been considered to be more active in inhibiting protein
breakdown. HMB is available as a food supplement in the US, which means
that it avoids many of the regulatory hurdles that are required of a
drug. A state of clinical deficiency of HMB is yet to be described. This
substance has no approved use in Australia. It is currently widely
used by athletes in a variety of sports and has no clinical
applications in medicine at present.
A randomised trial of doses of 0 g, 1.5 g and 3 g per day and three levels of
protein supplementation in 41 subjects showed increases in strength
during resistance training.31 A further study in eight
cyclists has shown a small increase in maximal oxygen
consumption.32 At present there are too
few data to ascertain whether the compound has a positive effect on
sporting performance and whether high doses have significant
toxicity.
Dose: Up to 15 grams/day are sometimes consumed.
IOC status: Not banned.
Adverse reactions: None have been described to date.
Detection: Can be quantified in urine.
|
|
|
Conclusions | |
Despite the paucity of data showing that any of these drugs, except
probably erythropoietin, have positive effects on sporting
performance, they are used increasingly for performance
enhancement. As toxicity and adverse reactions do not seem to deter
such use, detection and its consequences appear to be the main
deterrent in top-level sport. Detection methods therefore need to be
constantly updated and enhanced, and possibilities in this area
include the introduction of blood sampling, the use of carbon isotope
ratios to detect anabolic steroid misuse, and widening the scope of
out-of-competition testing. Doctors need to bear in mind that drug
misuse is not restricted to elite athletes -- indeed, most drug use in
sport occurs at a non-elite level. The possibility that a patient has
used unusual drugs to enhance performance, and that this may be either
causing or confounding the clinical state, should always be
considered in athletes presenting with an unusual illness.
|
|
|
Disclaimer |
While all efforts have been made to ensure the correct information
about the IOC status of the drugs mentioned, this may vary between
sports. The IOC status of any drug is subject to frequent revision.
Athletes and coaches should check the latest status of any drug
mentioned in this article with the relevant sporting body or with the
Australian Sports Drug Agency.
|
Acknowledgements | |
I thank Ms Dianne James, Librarian, Manly Hospital.
|
|
|
References |
- Laura R, White S, editors. Drug controversy in sport. Sydney: Allen
and Unwin, 1991: 1-4.
-
Corrigan AB. Dehydroepiandrosterone and sport. Med J Aust
1999; 171: 206-208.
-
Arlt W, Callies F, van Vlijmen JC, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone
replacement in women with adrenal insufficiency. N Engl J Med
1999; 341: 1013-1020.
-
Wallace MB, Lim LA, Cutler A, Bucci L. Effects of
dehydroepiandrosterone vs androstenedione supplementation in
men. Med Sci Exercise Sports 1999; 31: 1788-1792.
-
Yesalis CE. Medical, legal, and social implications of
androstenedione use. JAMA 1999; 281: 2043-2044.
-
King DS, Sharp RL, Vukovich MD, et al. Effect of oral
androstenedione on serum testosterone and adaptations to
resistance training in young men. JAMA 1999; 281: 2020-2028.
-
Leder BZ, Longcope C, Catlin DH, et al. Oral androstenedione
administration and serum testosterone concentrations in young men.
JAMA 2000; 283: 779-782.
-
Bowers LD. Oral dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation can
increase the testosterone/epitestosterone ratio. Clin
Chem 1999; 45: 295-297.
-
Kicman AT, Coutts SB, Walker CJ, Cowan DA. Proposed confirmatory
procedure for detecting 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone doping in male
athletes. Clin Chem 1995; 41: 1617-1627.
-
Muscling in on clenbuterol [editorial]. Lancet 1992;
340: 403.
-
Kamburoff PL, Prime FJ, Schmidt OP. The bronchodilator effects of
NAB 365. Br J Clin Pharm 1977; 4: 67-71.
-
Harahan JP, editor. Beta-agonists and their effects on animal
growth and carcass quality. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1987.
-
Prather ID, Brown DE, North P, Wilson JR. Clenbuterol: a
substitute for anabolic steroids? Med Sci Sports Exercise
1995; 27: 1118-1121.
-
American College of Sports Medicine. The use of blood doping as an
ergogenic aid. Med Sci Sports Exercise 1996; 28: 1-8.
-
Peddling drugs to the pedal pushers [editorial]. Lancet
1998; 352: 415.
-
Ekblom B. Blood doping and erythropoietin, the effects of
variation in haemoglobin concentration and other related factors on
physical performance. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (6 Suppl):
S40-42.
-
Leith W. EPO and cycling. Athletics Magazine
(Willowdale, Ontario, Canada) June 1992: 24-26.
-
Choi D, Kim M, Park J. Erythropoietin: physico- and biochemical
analysis. J Chromatog 1996; 687: 189-199.
-
Saris WHM, Sneden JMG, Brouns F. What is a normal red-blood cell
mass for professional cyclists? [letter]. Lancet 1998; 352:
1758.
-
Gareau R, Audran M, Baynes RD, et al. Erythropoietin abuse in
athletes. Nature 1996; 380: 113.
-
Willey WJ. Insulin as an anabolic aid? A danger for strength
athletes. Physician Sports Med 1997; 25: 103-104.
-
Dawson RT, Harrison MW. Use of insulin as an anabolic agent. Br J
Sports Med 1997; 31: 259.
-
Council on Scientific Affairs. Drug abuse in athletes. Anabolic
steroids and human growth hormone. JAMA 1988; 259:
1703-1705.
-
Yarasheski KE, Zachwieja JJ, Angleopoulos TJ, Bier DM.
Short-term growth hormone does not increase muscle protein
synthesis in experienced weight lifters. J Appl Physiol
1993; 74: 3073- 3076.
-
Taaffe DR, Pruitt L, Reim J, et al. Effect of recombinant human
growth hormone on the muscle strength response to resistance
exercise in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1994; 79:
1361-1366.
-
Crist DM, Peake GT, Egan PA, Waters DA. Body composition response
to exogenous GH during training in highly conditioned adults. J
Appl Physiol 1988; 65: 579-584.
-
Wu Z, Bidlingmaier M, Dall R, Strasburger CJ. Detection of doping
with growth hormone. Lancet 1999; 353: 895.
-
Bach LA. The insulin-like growth factor system: Basic and
clinical aspects. Aust N Z J Med 1999; 29: 355-361.
-
Ascoli M, Segaloff DL. Adenohypophyseal hormones and their
hypothalamic releasing factors. In: Goodman & Gilman's the
pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 9th ed. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1996: 1363-1382.
-
Sapir DG, Mackenzie W, Moyer ED, et al. Effects of
alpha-ketoisocaproate and of leucine on nitrogen metabolism in
postoperative patients. Lancet 1983; 1: 1010-1014.
-
Nissen S, Sharp R, Ray JA, et al. Effect of leucine metabolite
-hydroxy- -methylbutyrate
on muscle metabolism during resistance-exercise training. J
Appl Physiol 1996; 81: 2095-2104.
-
Vukovich MD, Adams GD. HMB may improve Vo2peak
[abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: S252.
|
Authors' details | |
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, St Vincent's
Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Michael C Kennedy, MD, FRACP, Physician.
Reprints will not be available from the author. Correspondence:
Dr M C Kennedy, Manly Non Invasive Cardiac Laboratory, 22 Darley Road,
Manly, NSW 2095. drmkennATozemail.com.au
©MJA 2000
Make a
comment
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2000 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|
|  |
| Back to text |
|