mja.com.au | The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | MJA shop | MJA Careers | Contact | Topics | Search | RSS  | Login | Buy full access

Healthcare

Accidental paracetamol overdosing and fulminant hepatic failure in children

Fiona K Miles, Ramananda Kamath, Stuart F A Dorney, Kevin J Gaskin and Edward V O'Loughlin

MJA 1999; 171: 472-475
See also Hynson

Abstract - Introduction - Methods - Results - Discussion - References - Authors' details
Make a comment - Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail - Current contents list - More articles on Pathology


Abstract Objective: To delineate clinical characteristics useful for identifying children with liver failure due to accidental paracetamol overdose.
Design: Retrospective review of medical records of all patients admitted from 1985 to 1998 with fulminant hepatic failure.
Setting: Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, a tertiary referral centre for paediatric liver transplantation.
Main outcome measures: Contribution of paracetamol to liver failure; other risk factors for liver failure; comparison of clinical features of paracetamol group and others.
Results: 18 patients were identified. Eight were considered to have accidental paracetamol hepatotoxicity. In a further three, other risk factors were present but paracetamol was considered a major contributor to liver failure. The seven remaining patients had other risk factors for liver failure. Patients with paracetamol-induced liver failure usually had an acute prodromal illness with prolonged fasting and, at presentation, had encephalopathy, coagulopathy, very high transaminase levels, but disproportionately low total bilirubin levels. Five patients had hypoglycaemia. End-stage liver failure occurred in 4/11 of the paracetamol group compared with 7/7 of the others.
Conclusion: Accidental paracetamol overdose is associated with fulminant hepatic failure in infants and children. Patients present with high transaminase levels and liver synthetic failure out of proportion to the level of serum bilirubin. Prompt identification of such patients is important as many recover with supportive therapy.


Introduction Paracetamol is a commonly used antipyretic and analgesic medication; in 1996, it was the second most common drug used in Australia, with 4.75 million units dispensed.1 There is a large range in the preparations of doses available, and the potential for accidental overdose due to confusion over concentration and frequency of dosing is high.2

Intentional paracetamol overdose is a well-recognised cause of fulminant liver failure.2 However, there are few reports of accidental overdose due to recurrent ingestion of high therapeutic doses in children.3-6 Alonso et al reported seven children with fulminant liver failure without obvious cause.5 All patients had ingested paracetamol, but serum paracetamol levels were not in the toxic range. The authors postulated that, although paracetamol may have contributed to the liver injury, it was not causative. Two other reports describe accidental multiple dosing causing liver failure in children, with many patients receiving doses in the recommended therapeutic range.3,6 Prodromal illness associated with prolonged fasting was also recognised as potentially important in the development of liver injury.4,5

Since 1985, the Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children has been a tertiary referral centre for paediatric liver transplantation. Over this period, 19 patients have presented with acute liver failure. Our aims were to review all cases of acute liver failure, to identify patients with accidental (overdose with therapeutic intent) paracetamol-induced liver failure, and to define clinical features which may be useful in identifying such cases.


Methods All patients at the Royal Alexandra Hospital with fulminant hepatic failure -- severe acute liver injury with no pre-existing liver disease resulting in encephalopathy within eight weeks of onset -- are managed by members of the liver transplant service. We reviewed case records of such patients for a history of liver disease, presenting symptoms, pre-existing history of paracetamol ingestion, clinical status at presentation, laboratory investigations and outcome.

Paracetamol hepatotoxicity was considered likely if patients with liver failure had:

  • a history of paracetamol ingestion over several days, confirmed by the finding of paracetamol in the blood; and

  • exclusion (by routine laboratory testing) of other known causes of acute liver failure, such as viral hepatitis (A, B, C, Epstein-Barr virus, cyto-megalovirus, HSV-6, varicella or adenovirus), drug- or toxin-induced hepatotoxicity, inborn errors of metabolism (Wilson's disease, 1-antitrypsin deficiency, and fatty acid oxidation abnormalities).

Approval for our study was obtained from the hospital's institutional ethics committee.


Results Ninteen patients were identified, aged 6-165 months. One adolescent developed liver failure from suicidal overdose (30 g), and made a complete recovery with conservative treatment; this patient was excluded from the study.

Paracetamol hepatotoxicity
Eleven of the remaining 18 patients had presumed paracetamol hepatotoxicity. The patient data shown in the Table represent peak levels of study parameters or stage of encephalopathy. All patients had coagulopathy, elevated transaminase levels, and abnormal total serum bilirubin.

Eight patients (numbers 1-8, Table) were identified as having paracetamol overdose as the only risk factor for liver failure. All eight patients had a history of a prodromal illness for which they received paracetamol for 4-21 days prior to the identification of liver disease. Reported paracetamol intakes ranged from 20 to 200 mg/kg per day. Paracetamol was detected in the blood of all eight patients, and all were encephalopathic (stage I-III) at presentation. Patients 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 were hypoglycaemic (blood glucose levels < 3 mmol/L) at admission.

Liver failure resolved with supportive treatment in six of these patients; Patients 2 and 6 died while awaiting liver transplants. Patient 5 survived, but had severe neurological sequelae as a result of protracted hypoglycaemia and stage IV encephalopathy. Patient 4 was admitted to the intensive care unit, but was not initially recognised as having liver failure.

Patients 9, 10 and 11 had probable paracetamol hepatotoxicity, but also had other risk factors for liver injury. Patient 9 had Ewing's sarcoma and had been receiving chemotherapy. Multiple doses of paracetamol had been administered in hospital before the onset of liver failure. At postmortem, hepatic centrilobular necrosis consistent with paracetamol hepatotoxicity was found. Patient 10 also had a history of paracetamol ingestion, although the quantity could not be determined from the history. However, a high level of paracetamol was detected in the blood. The patient had had one previous admission with mumps encephalitis, which resulted in epilepsy and mental retardation. He had also been taking sodium valproate for seizures for several years, with no evidence of liver abnormalities. The patient died of end-stage liver failure and post-mortem revealed severe centrilobular necrosis consistent with paracetamol- rather than valproate-induced liver injury. Patient 11 had a mild prodromal illness due to Epstein-Barr virus infection, but ingested large quantities of paracetamol and presented with the clinical picture as described for Patients 1-8. Coagulopathy precluded liver biopsy in this group of patients.

Metabolic studies: Urinary metabolic studies failed to reveal abnormal metabolites indicative of fatty acid oxidation defects in Patients 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8, and skin fibroblast assays for fatty acid oxidation defects were normal in Patients 3, 6, 7 and 8. For Patient 4, no metabolic studies were performed.

Other causes of liver failure
Seven patients presented with fulminating liver failure from other causes, including Wilson's disease (1), cytomegalovirus infection (1), hepatitis B virus infection (1), presumed viral hepatitis (3), and an adverse reaction to dapsone (1). All patients presented with evidence of severe synthetic failure (coagulopathy and hypoalbuminaemia) and hepatic encephalopathy.

Distinguishing paracetamol hepatotoxicity
The Figure compares the serum bilirubin levels plotted against alanine transaminase levels in both groups of patients. In contrast to patients with other causes of acute liver failure, patients with presumed paracetamol hepatotoxicity all had serum bilirubin levels less than 200 µmol/L, and most had alanine transaminase levels greater than 4000 IU/L.

Hypoglycaemia was not detected in any of the patients with liver failure from causes other than paracetamol, and all patients in this group either died or received transplants.


Discussion

Clinical features
Accidental paracetamol overdose was the likely cause of acute liver failure in most children in this series presenting to a single paediatric institution. Eight of the 18 patients had likely paracetamol-induced liver failure due to accidental overdose, and in a further three paracetamol was a major risk factor. A distinct clinical pattern emerges when the patients with definite or presumed paracetamol toxicity are compared with patients with other causes of fulminant hepatic failure. Patients with paracetamol toxicity presented with a non-specific prodromal illness, often with fasting and/or vomiting. At the time of hospitalisation they had evidence of severe synthetic failure, often with associated hypoglycaemia, coagulopathy and mild encephalopathy, but with disproportionately low bilirubin levels. Moreover, most patients recovered with supportive therapy.

A history of paracetamol ingestion over several days is important in establishing the diagnosis of paracetamol toxicity. In our study, reported ingestion of as little as 20 mg/kg per day over a protracted period was associated with liver failure. Similar toxic dosage ranges have been reported in other studies of children,3,5 raising the question of whether some susceptible children could suffer acute liver failure as a result of therapeutic doses of paracetamol ingested over several days. However, it is important to emphasise that the paracetamol intake data reported in this study, as in previous published reports, rely on history alone. The dosages reported by parents could not be verified by other means. Whether therapeutic doses of paracetamol could result in liver failure in susceptible children remains unresolved owing to the poor quality of the existing paediatric data.

Serum paracetamol levels
Paracetamol was detected in the serum of patients with presumed paracetamol hepatotoxicity. Although other investigators have used a level of 0.04 mmol/L3,4 as indicative of toxicity, it is not clear that this is a meaningful level in an individual with repeated ingestions over several days. A level of 40 µmol/L or greater at 24 hours after the ingested dose is thought to predict the likely development of liver failure, as portrayed in the nomogram adapted by Rumack and Matthews.7 However, this nomogram was derived from adult patients presenting with liver failure from a single suicidal overdose. No studies have addressed the question of serum levels likely to predict hepatic failure after repeated doses. We observed that the possible role of paracetamol was, on occasion, discounted because paracetamol levels were lower than those predictive of the development of liver failure from the nomogram. Poor correlation between paracetamol levels and liver toxicity with accidental overdose has been observed in a large series of adult patients in whom less than 50% had peak serum levels greater than 10 µg/mL (40 µmol/L).4 Similarly, low levels were reported in a small series of children.5 Nevertheless, serum paracetamol levels should be measured routinely in the investigation of children presenting with acute liver failure as soon as possible after assessment, but should be interpreted with caution.

A recent study of paracetamol toxicity in adults by Schiodt et al identified a distinct group of patients who developed liver dysfunction after accidental poisoning with therapeutic intent.4 This group of 21 patients had ingested frequent doses of paracetamol for pain relief. Toxicity may have been compounded by prior starvation.2 Mortality in that study (4/21) was similar to ours, but was substantially higher than in a group of adult patients with non-accidental overdose. Some doubts about the role of paracetamol in causing fulminant hepatic failure in the study by Schiodt et al have been raised, as a high proportion of patients had a history of concurrent alcohol abuse and dosage levels were considered by some to be too low to cause toxicity.8-11

In contrast to that study of adults, studies in children raise considerable concern that accidental paracetamol overdose causes liver failure in this age group.3,5 However, it is important to note that all the reported series in children (including our own) are anecdotal reports. No studies have included a control group or undertaken a case-control study design, although liver biopsies were performed in six of seven patients in one series.5 While one could argue that the association between accidental overdose and liver failure in children is speculative, several arguments support the likely association with paracetamol:

  • Suicidal overdose in adults produces acute liver failure with a clinical and biochemical picture very similar to that reported in our study of overdose due to repeated ingestion.

  • The presence of severe liver synthetic failure and encephalopathy with the pattern of liver function tests we describe (see Figure) is a very atypical presentation for most diseases which produce liver failure in children.

  • In our study, four children had centrilobular necrosis on postmortem examination, a finding consistent with paracetamol hepatotoxicity.

  • While some of the clinical characterisics, such as prodromal illness, hypoglycaemia, high transaminase levels and coagulopathy, would be consistent with Reye's syndrome,12 it is not likely that this diagnosis would explain the abnormalities which we attribute to paracetamol toxicity.

Recent in-vitro and animal studies indicate that paracetamol or its metabolites impair mitochondrial metabolism, and this effect occurs before hepatocyte necrosis.13-15 In this regard, paracetamol hepatotoxicity demonstrates some remarkable clinical and biochemical similarities to some inborn errors of fatty acid oxidation which can present with fulminant liver failure.16

Despite several attempts to define a safe therapeutic regimen, there is still no consensus as to the appropriate dose, or even efficacy, in children. One report recommended single doses of 10-15 mg/kg four-hourly as a "safe maximum".17 However, Nahata et al demonstrated that paracetamol may accumulate substantially, with raised concentrations after therapeutic doses for two to three days, even with doses of 13 mg/kg 24-hourly.18 One study which did review the potential for chronic overdose in children was done by Penna et al,19 in which 190 of 299 paediatric inpatients received paracetamol for indications of fever and postoperative pain. Most were prescribed four-hourly doses, with potential for greater than 90 mg/kg per day. Nearly a quarter of the high doses were for children under 12 months of age.

Although it can be argued that paracetamol "is commonly administered to children . . . for most febrile illnesses",5 and thus can be a frequent coincidental association, there is evidence that accidental overdose while ingesting high therapeutic doses of paracetamol for pain and fever relief may cause fulminating liver failure in children. Clinicians should be alerted to the possibility of paracetamol toxicity in an infant or child presenting with a prodromal illness associated with fasting and the regular ingestion of paracetamol over several days. Hypoglycaemia, severe synthetic failure and encephalopathy with very high transaminase levels (above 4000 IU/L) and a serum bilirubin level less than 200 µmol/L would support the diagnosis. It is important to distinguish this group of patients, as the prognosis for recovery is good with conservative therapy. If N-acetylcysteine is instituted early, liver transplantation may be avoided.


References
  1. Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services. Top 10 drugs. Australian Prescriber 1997; 20: 92.
  2. Vale JA, Proudfoot AT. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning. Lancet 1995; 346: 547-552.
  3. Heubi JE, Barbacci MB, Zimmerman HJ. Therapeutic misadventures with acetaminophen: hepatotoxicity after multiple doses in children. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 22-27.
  4. Schiodt FV, Rochling FA, Casey DL, Lee WM. Acetaminophen toxicity in an urban county hospital. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1112-1117.
  5. Alonso EM, Sokol RJ, Hart J, et al. Fulminant hepatitis associated with centrilobular hepatic necrosis in young children. J Pediatr 1995; 127: 888-894.
  6. Rivera-Penera T, Gugig R, Davis J, et al. Outcome of acetaminophen overdose in pediatric patients and factors contributing to hepatotoxicity. J Pediatr 1997; 130: 300-304.
  7. Rumack BH, Matthews H. Acetaminophen poisoning and toxicity. Pediatrics 1975; 55: 871-876.
  8. Walker AM. Acetaminophen toxicity in an urban county hospital [letter]. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 543.
  9. Avorn J. Acetaminophen toxicity in an urban county hospital [letter]. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 543-544.
  10. Rao RB, Hoffman RS. Acetaminophen toxicity in an urban county hospital [letter]. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 544.
  11. Makin AJ, Williams R, Bernal W. Acetaminophen toxicity in an urban county hospital [letter]. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 544.
  12. Diagnosis and treatment of Reye's syndrome. JAMA 1981; 246: 2441-2444.
  13. Burcham PC, Harman AW. Acetaminophen toxicity results in site-specific mitochondrial damage in isolated mouse hepatocytes. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 5059-5054.
  14. Vendemiale G, Grattagliano I, Altomare E, et al. Effect of acetaminophen administration on hepatic glutathione compartmentation and mitochondrial energy metabolism in the rat. Biochem Pharmacol 1996; 52: 1147-1154.
  15. Nazareth WM, Sethi JK, McLean AE. Effect of paracetamol on mitochondrial membrane function in rat liver slices. Biochem Pharmacol 1991; 42: 931-936.
  16. Tyni T, Palotie A, Viinikka L, et al. Long chain 3-hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency with the G1528C mutation: clinical presentation of thirteen patients. J Pediatr 1997; 130: 67-76.
  17. Temple AR. Pediatric dosing of acetaminophen. Pediatr Pharmacol 1983; 3: 321-327.
  18. Nahata MC, Powell DA, Durrell DE, Miller MA. Acetaminophen accumulation in pediatric patients after repeated therapeutic doses. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1984; 27: 57-59.
  19. Penna AC, Dawson KP, Penna CM. Is prescribing paracetamol "pro re nata" acceptable? J Paediatr Child Health 1993; 29: 104-106.

(Received 25 Jun, accepted 2 Sep, 1999)


Authors' details The Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, Sydney, NSW.
Fiona K Miles, MB ChB, Fellow in Intensive Care;
Ramananda Kamath, MD, FRACP, Associate Professor and Staff Specialist, Department of Gastroenterology;
Stuart F A Dorney, MB BS, FRACP, Staff Specialist, Department of Gastroenterology;
Kevin J Gaskin, MD, FRACP, Professor and Staff Specialist, Department of Gastroenterology;
Edward V O'Loughlin, MD, FRACP, Staff Specialist, Department of Gastroenterology.

Reprints: Dr E V O'Loughlin, Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children, PO Box 3515, Parramatta, NSW 2124.
tedoATnch.edu.au

©MJA 1999
Make a comment


Home | Issues | MJA shop | Terms of use | MJA Careers | More... | Contact | Topics | Search | RSS 

mja.com.au | The Medical Journal of Australia  


Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further reproduction or distribution of the articles should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For permission, contact the Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".

<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/> © 1999 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate your comments.


Clinical characteristics of 11 patients with liver failure due to paracetamol

Patient: 1
Age (months): 21
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): 20 (21 days) & 171 (last day)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 10 (D2)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 123
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): 9618
PT INR: 3.3
Hepatic coma stage: II
Outcome: Resolved

Patient: 2
Age (months): 63
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): 100 (6 days)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 560 (D1)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 87
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): > 10 000
PT INR: 9.7
Hepatic coma stage: IV
Outcome: Died (PM: centrilobular necrosis)

Patient: 3
Age (months): 36
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): Very frequent oral and rectal doses
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 30 (D2)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 70
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): > 10 000
PT INR: 4
Hepatic coma stage: II
Outcome: Resolved

Patient: 4
Age (months): 77
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): 200 (11 days)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 30 (D6)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 19
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): 1216
PT INR: 1.4
Hepatic coma stage: III
Outcome: Resolved

Patient: 5
Age (months): 31
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): 71 (4 days)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 160 (D1)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 143
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): > 10 000
PT INR: > 20
Hepatic coma stage: IV
Outcome: Resolved, severe brain damage

Patient: 6
Age (months): 129
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): 20 (7 days)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 180 (D1)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 82
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): > 10 000
PT INR: 5
Hepatic coma stage: IV
Outcome: Died (PM: centrilobular necrosis)

Patient: 7
Age (months): 6
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): Unknown
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 160 (D1)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 94
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): 9 170
PT INR: 6.9
Hepatic coma stage: III
Outcome: Resolved

Patient: 8
Age (months): 54
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): 74mg/kg/day (5 days) & 150mg/kg/day (final day)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 900 (D1)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 57
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): 8 300
PT INR: 5.4
Hepatic coma stage: II
Outcome: Resolved

Patient: 9
Age (months): 79
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): Unknown (frequent dosing over several days)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 70 (D1)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 185
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): 4 300
PT INR: 3.1
Hepatic coma stage: IV
Outcome: Died (PM: centrilobular necrosis)

Patient: 10
Age (months): 132
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): Unknown
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 180 (D1)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 195
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): 3 620
PT INR: 4.2
Hepatic coma stage: IV
Outcome: Died (PM: centrilobular necrosis)

Patient: 11
Age (months): 106
Paracetamol dosage (mg/kg per day): 175 (7 days)
Serum:
Paracetamol level (µmol/L): 80 (D3)*
Bilirubin level (µmol/L): 102
Alanine transaminase level (IU/L): 6 700
PT INR: 2.4
Hepatic coma stage: III
Outcome: Resolved

* Days post admission to hospital. Alanine transaminase level and INR measured on admission to hospital but not subsequently, despite deterioration of coma stage. PM = postmortem. OD = overdose. PT-INR = international normalised ratio (of prothrombin time). Normal ranges: serum bilirubin, 1-15 µmol/L; alanine transaminase, 10-50 IU/L; INR, 1-1.2.
Back to text

Figure 1
Back to text