|
Research
Erectile dysfunction in the community: a prevalence study
Carole B Pinnock, Alan M F Stapleton and Villis R Marshall
MJA 1999; 171: 353-357
For editorial comment see Lowy
→ Other articles have cited this article
Abstract -
Introduction -
Methods -
Results -
Discussion -
Acknowledgements -
References -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on Urology
|
| |
Abstract |
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of
erectile dysfunction (ED) in the South Australian community, and the
influence of demographic and other risk factors.
Design: Survey by mailed questionnaire (based on the
University of California, Los Angeles prostate cancer index) of a
subset (men who agreed to participate) of a probability sample of the
South Australian community who completed a multiuser interview
survey.
Participants and setting: Men over the age of 40 in
South Australia.
Main outcome measures: Sexual desire, orgasm,
ability to have an erection, adequacy (firmness) of erections for
intercourse, frequency of erections when wanted, frequency of
intercourse, nocturnal or morning erections, and history of
prostate surgery; total sexual function score based on these.
Results: 612 men (86.7%) agreed to answer the sexual
function survey; 427 (69.8%) returned questionnaires. ED was
strongly correlated with age in all seven domains of sexual function.
Erections inadequate for intercourse affected 3% of
40-49-year-olds, increasing to 64% of 70-79-year-olds. The
frequency of intercourse considered normal for age by men 50-69 years
was 1-6 times weekly; the disparity between this and reported
frequency increased in men over 60 years, as did the difference
between sexual desire and potency. A history of vigorous exercise was
protective across all ages. High triglyceride levels, blood
pressure medication and non-cancer surgery for prostate disease
were independent predictors of poor sexual function at older ages.
High cholesterol level was an independent predictor of impotence.
Conclusions: We found similar or higher levels of ED
than in comparable overseas studies. Disparity between potency and
desire was greatest, and hence the age group in whom demand for
treatment may be highest, in those 60 years and older. Cardiovascular
risk factors were predictors of ED in these older men, suggesting that
prevention may benefit sexual function. Non-cancer prostate
surgery may be a greater contributor to ED than previously realised.
|
| | Introduction |
Establishing the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) in the
community is difficult,1 but important for
understanding the need for services, establishing functional
expectations of men as they age and for determining the influence of
demographic and preventable risk factors. An understanding of
community prevalence of ED is useful when evaluating treatments for
prostate disease which carry high risks of ED. Community prevalence
has been examined in international, but not Australian,
studies.1-4 One Australian study of ED
prevalence in a Perth general practice population has been reported
in conference proceedings.5 We undertook this study to
establish the prevalence of erectile dysfunction among Australian
men, and to investigate the influence of risk factors.
|
| |
Methods |
Questions were included in the spring 1997 Omnibus survey, a
multiple-user household interview survey which provides a
representative sample of the South Australian population. We have
reported the methods of and results from this annual survey
previously.6-8
The Omnibus survey included questions about age, educational
attainment, marital status, household income, area of residence,
blood pressure group (low, normal, borderline, high), cholesterol
group (low, normal, high), alcohol intake by frequency (days per
week) and volume (standard drinks per day when drinking), doctor's
report of high triglyceride levels, body mass index (BMI), whether
vigorous exercise was undertaken in the past two weeks, current and
previous smoking status, and number of cigarettes per day usually
smoked. Also included were questions about the presence of lower
urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) such as nocturia, frequency, urgency,
and a visit to a doctor for LUTS, as reported previously.6
In addition, men aged 40 years and over were asked if they would be
prepared to answer a further, mailed questionnaire on urological
issues. This comprised an introductory letter explaining the
purpose of the survey,7 questions on sexual
function and one on history of prostate surgery.
To provide an indication of men's expectations of intercourse
frequency across age groups, the first question asked what frequency
of intercourse the respondent considered normal for a man of his age.
Respondents were then offered the opportunity to return the
questionnaire without answering further questions if they
considered these too intrusive.
Sexual function questions were derived from the UCLA (University of
California, Los Angeles) prostate cancer index developed by Litwin
et al.9,10 These applied to the
previous three months and covered seven domains: (i) sexual desire,
(ii) orgasm, (iii) ability to have an erection, (iv) frequency of
erections when wanted, (v) frequency of intercourse, (vi) frequency
of morning or nocturnal erections, and (vii) firmness of erections.
The first six of these had five response options ("nil", "poor",
"fair", "good", "very good" for domains i-iii; "never had an erection
when I wanted one", "less than half the time when I wanted one", "about
half the time I wanted one", "whenever I wanted one" for domain iv;
"once or more daily", "1-6 times weekly", "1-3 times monthly", "less
than once a month", "not at all" for domain v; "never", "seldom [less
than a quarter of the time]", "not often [less than half the time]",
"often [more than half the time]", "very often [more than 75% of the
time]" for domain vi), while the seventh had four ("no erections at
all", "not firm enough for any sexual activity", "firm enough for
masturbation and foreplay only", "firm enough for intercourse").
Additional questions involved history of prostate surgery (for
cancer and for non-cancerous conditions). Ethical consideration
for the study was by Repatriation General Hospital's Research Ethics
Committee.
| |
Analysis |
We defined sexual dysfunction as a response of one of the two lowest
response categories (eg, "nil" or "poor") in each of the first six
domains. Confidence intervals were adjusted for a design effect of
1.1 to allow for clustering.11 Dysfunction in the
seventh domain (firmness of erections) was termed "impotence",
defined as "usual quality of erections during the past three months
not firm enough for intercourse" (corresponds with National
Institutes of Health definition)12 -- one of the three lowest
response options for this domain. A total erectile function score was
derived by adding scores for each of the seven domains. The resulting
score out of a possible 34 was expressed as a percentage; a score of 0
indicated worst possible function and 100% indicated best possible
function in all domains. The reliability coefficient (Cronbach's
alpha) of this seven-item score was 0.940.
The association of demographic and cardiovascular risk factors with
total sexual function (expressed as a continuous variable) and with
impotence (a dichotomous variable) was examined after allowing for
the effects of age by means of analysis of variance and logistic
regression. For analysis, data were weighted by household size, age,
sex and geographic region to benchmarks derived from the resident
South Australian population in August 1996. We used SPSS for
Windows13 for statistical
analysis.
|
| |
Results |
The numbers and age breakdown of respondents are shown in Box 1. The
mean age of respondents was 57.5 years (standard error, 0.58). Of the
745 men aged 40 years and over who responded to the Omnibus survey
(representing a response rate of 70.8%), 612 (82.1%) agreed to
complete a further, mailed questionnaire on urological issues.
These questionnaires were returned by 427 respondents (69.8%), 371
(86.9%) of whom agreed to answer the full questionnaire. Box 1 shows
that the age distribution was the same in all of these groups. We
weighted further analyses to reflect the age distribution in the
South Australian community; marginal totals thus do not correspond
to the totals in Box 1.
A comparison of respondents who agreed to answer the sexual function
questions with those who did not agree to a further survey, did not
respond to the mailed form or did not agree to answer the sexual
function questions showed no significant differences in age,
marital status, blood pressure, cholesterol and triglyceride
levels, blood pressure medication or visit to a doctor for LUTS. Men
who answered the sexual function questions were more likely to report
vigorous exercise in the past two weeks (25.0% v 15.4%; P =
0.001), and more likely to drink alcohol five or more times per week
(34.2% v 25.3%; P = 0.026) than those who did not answer these
questions.
| |
Frequency of intercourse | |
The frequency of intercourse considered by respondents as normal for
their age, shown in Box 2(a), and actual reported frequency of
intercourse were strongly correlated (Spearman's correlation
coefficient, 0.62; P < 0.0001). Most 40-60-year-olds
considered that intercourse 1-6 times per week was normal for their
age and most reported this frequency of intercourse. In older men,
however, a discrepancy emerged: most 70-79-year-olds considered
1-3 times per month to be normal for their age, but most reported an
actual frequency of less than once per month. Box 2(b) illustrates
this more clearly. In younger age groups, the reported frequency
approximated that considered normal for age, but in older age groups
it was substantially lower. Similarly, Box 2(c) shows that, while
potency exceeds desire in men aged 40-59 years, after age 60 years
desire exceeds potency.
| |
Prevalence of erectile dysfunction | |
Erectile dysfunction was strongly correlated with age across all
seven domains (Box 3). The prevalence of impotence (defined above)
increased sharply from 3% in 40-49-year-olds to 42% in
60-69-year-olds and 64% in 70-79-year-olds. Other domains of sexual
function, including morning or nocturnal erections, followed this
pattern of steep decline in the fifth and sixth decades. Total sexual
function scores ranged from 17% to 97%, with a mean of 68.1% (standard
error, 1.1); 21% of respondents had a score of 50% or less. The sexual
function score was also strongly correlated with age (Pearson's
correlation coefficient, 0.63; P < 0.0001).
| |
Demographic risk factors | |
Age, income, education, marital status, area of residence,
occupation and country of birth were examined for their association
with total sexual function and impotence. By far the strongest
contributor to total sexual function score was age, and so the
contribution of other factors was examined singly after first
accounting for the effects of age in analysis of variance models,
including first-order interactions (sexual function) and logistic
regression (impotence). Where factors or their first-order
interactions were significant, a combined model was examined. A
summary of these analyses is given in Box 4.
Men with lower socioeconomic status (income, education,
occupation) tended to have lower sexual function, and this
association was seen particularly in older men. In the 70-79 years age
group, the total sexual function score varied from 47.1 in the lowest
education category to 61.7 in the highest. Sexual function tended to
be lower in Australian-born than overseas-born respondents. When
tested in a model containing cardiovascular risk factors, this
association remained. No demographic factors, apart from age, were
significant contributors to impotence.
| |
Cardiovascular and other risk factors | |
The cardiovascular risk factors shown in Box 4, as well as presence of
LUTS, doctor visit for LUTS and surgery for prostate disease (cancer
or non-cancer), were examined for their effects on total sexual
function and impotence, as described for demographic factors.
A number of factors were significantly (P < 0.05)
associated with decreased sexual function after controlling for the
effects of age. For total sexual function, these were ever having
smoked, taking blood pressure medication and having had surgery for
non-cancer prostate disease. A history of vigorous exercise was
protective. Risk factors for impotence were high body mass index,
high levels of triglycerides and cholesterol, and surgery for
non-cancer prostate disease. Again, a history of vigorous exercise
was protective.
When combined models were constructed with these factors, the number
that remained independently significant was reduced (Box 4). For
total sexual function, these were vigorous exercise, high
triglyceride levels, blood pressure medication, and surgery for
non-cancer prostate disease. The combined model for total sexual
function explained 55% of the variance. The observed power was low for
all non-significant factors. The effects of cardiovascular risk
factors were stronger in older age groups. For example, men in their
60s with high triglyceride levels had a total sexual function score of
41% (95% CI, 31%-52%), compared with 64% (95% CI, 59%-70%) for men of
the same age who did not have this risk factor.
|
| |
Discussion |
Few international or Australian studies of the prevalence of sexual
dysfunction have surveyed the general community.1 Our study was
based on a representative sample of the South Australian community,
and employed rigorous methods which have been previously used in
other prevalence studies.1,8 The study was undertaken
before the recent introduction of the drug oral sildenafil for
erectile dysfunction.
The subsample who answered questions on sexual function were similar
in terms of most demographic and risk factor variables tested, but did
report undertaking more vigorous exercise, and more frequent
alcohol consumption. They may therefore reflect a more physically
active subgroup, and our estimates of erectile dysfunction are
likely to be conservative.
Relative to other studies with comparable methods and measures of
sexual dysfunction, the prevalences we found were similar or higher.
For example, a study of frequency of sexual activity reported that
34.7% of married 60-65-year-old people did not have sexual
intercourse within the preceding month,14 while we found that 34.3%
of 60-69-year-old men reported having intercourse "less than once a
month". A survey of 1240 men attending general practices in Perth
found a 45% prevalence of "complete ED [erectile dysfunction]" in
70-79-year-old men,5 compared with our finding of
impotence in 64.2%, and 64.3% in a study by Diokno et al.15 The
frequently quoted Massachusetts Male Aging Study reports a
prevalence of complete impotence of 9.6% for a 40-70-year-old
population;2 the corresponding figure in
our study was 16%.
As expected, frequency of intercourse considered normal for age was
strongly correlated with the frequency of intercourse reported (Figure 2). Solstad and Hertoft found that,
while 40% of interviewed Danish men reported some kind of sexual
dysfunction, only 7% considered their problems abnormal for their
age,16 implying that men tend to
see their own functional level as normal. Nevertheless, in our study,
the discrepancy between reported frequency of intercourse and that
considered normal for age increased with age. It was greatest in men 70
years and older, suggesting that it is older men who may be most
concerned about their sexual function. Consistent with this,
potency exceeded desire in younger age groups, but the relationship
was reversed in men aged 60 years and over. About one in five men over the
age of 50 experience good to very good sexual desire, but nil to poor
erectile function; these men may be more likely to seek treatment. If
the goal of treatment is to achieve perceived "normal function for
this age", this may be a frequency of intercourse of 1-3 times monthly
for 70-79-year-olds and weekly in the case of 40-69-year-olds.
The effects of demographic risk factors such as income and education
were more apparent in older age groups and were consistent with lower
sexual function in lower socioeconomic groups. No reason is
immediately apparent for the lower sexual function of
Australian-born men compared with their overseas-born
counterparts.
Cardiovascular and medical risk factors reflected a conventional
pattern.1,17 Predictors of low total
sexual function scores after controlling for age only were smoking,
blood pressure medication, high triglyceride levels and non-cancer
prostate surgery, while a history of vigorous exercise provided a
protective effect. In a combined model, smoking was no longer
significant. Predictors of impotence after controlling for age only
were high body mass index, high triglyceride levels, high
cholesterol level, surgery for non-cancer prostate disease, while
vigorous exercise was again protective. In a combined model, only
high cholesterol remained significant. However, it is likely that
small numbers of respondents limited the power of our study to
investigate all these factors simultaneously.
Our findings suggest that men experience poor sexual function as a
deficit in the same age ranges in which cardiovascular risk factors
are major determinants of that function, raising the possibility of
prevention. It would be interesting to know whether, for men 60 years
and over, improving cardiovascular risk factor profile would also
reduce the prevalence of sexual dysfunction.
Also of interest is the consistent and independent effect of
non-cancer prostate surgery on sexual function. While its effects
are small relative to age, it may point to a higher impotence rate than
is commonly believed to result from this type of surgery,18 and this
warrants further investigation.
|
Acknowledgements | |
We thank Living Health and Quitline for generously sharing their data
on cardiovascular risk factors, and the AntiCancer Foundation for
funding the prostate cancer questions. We would also like to thank the
Behavioural Epidemiology Unit, South Australian Department of
Human Services, and Lynne Giles, Flinders University, for
assistance with aspects of the statistical analyses.
|
| |
References |
- Bortolotti A, Parazzini F, Colli E, Landoni M. The epidemiology of
erectile dysfunction and its risk factors. Int J Androl 1997;
20: 323-334.
-
Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, et al. Impotence and its
medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts
Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54-61.
-
Helgason AR, Adolfsson J, Dickman P, et al. Factors associated with
waning sexual function among elderly men and prostate cancer
patients. J Urol 1997; 158: 155-159.
-
Jonler M, Moon T, Brannan W, et al. The effect of age, ethnicity and
geographical location on impotence and quality of life. Br J
Urol 1995; 75: 651-655.
-
Chew K, Burio C, Stuckey B, Jamrozik K. Erectile dysfunction in
general medical practice. A study in Perth, Australia. Int J
Impotence Res 1997; 9 (Suppl 1): S36.
-
Pinnock C, Marshall V. Troublesome urinary symptoms in the
community: a prevalence study. Med J Aust 1997; 167: 72-75.
-
Weller D, Pinnock C, Silagy C, et al. Prostate cancer testing in
South Australian men: influence of sociodemographic factors,
health beliefs and lower urinary tract symptoms. Aust N Z J Public
Health 1998; 22: 400-402.
-
Pinnock C, Weller D, Marshall V. Self-reported prevalence of
prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing in South Australia: a
community study. Med J Aust 1998; 169: 25-28.
-
Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in men
treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1995; 273(2):
129-35. [See comments.]
-
Litwin MS, Nied RJ, Dhanani N. Health-related quality of life in
men with erectile dysfunction. J General Intern Med 1998; 13:
159-166.
-
Kish L. Estimates of unit variance: design effect. Survey
sampling. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1965: 257-263.
-
NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development
Panel on Impotence. JAMA 1993; 270: 83-88.
-
SPSS for Windows [computer program], version 6.1. Chicago, Ill:
SPSS Inc, 1996.
-
Marsiglio W, Donnelly D. Sexual relations in later life: a
national study of married persons. J Gerontol 1991; 46(6):
S338-S344.
-
Diokno AC, Brown MB, Herzog AR. Sexual function in the elderly.
Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 197-200.
-
Solstad K, Hertoft P. Frequency of sexual problems and sexual
dysfunction in middle-aged Danish men. Arch Sexual Behavior
1993; 22: 51-58.
-
Helgason AR, Adolfsson J, Dickman P, et al. Waning sexual function
-- the most important disease-specific distress for patients with
prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 1996; 73: 1417-1421.
-
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of
uncomplicated lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Canberra:
National Health and Medical Research Council, 1997.
(Received 30 Nov 1998, accepted 28 Jun 1999)
|
| | Authors' details |
Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Adelaide, SA.
Carole B Pinnock, PhD, Principal Research Scientist,
Division of Surgery; Alan M F Stapleton, PhD, FRACS,
Director, Urology Unit; Villis R Marshall, MD, FRACS, Head,
Division of Surgery, and Head, Department of Surgery, Flinders
Medical Centre.
Reprints will not be available from the authors. Correspondence: Dr C
B Pinnock, Division of Surgery, Repatriation General Hospital, Daws
Road, Daw Park, SA 5041. carole.pinnockAThealth.sa.gov.au
©MJA 1999
Make a
comment
Other articles have cited this article:
David M de Kretser, Megan Cock and Carol Holden. The Men in Australia Telephone Survey (MATeS) — lessons for all Med J Aust 2006; 185 (8): 412-413. [Editorials] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/185_08_161006/dek10080_fm.html>
Mark F Harris and Suzanne McKenzie. Men's health: what's a GP to do? Med J Aust 2006; 185 (8): 440-444. [General Practice — Update] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/185_08_161006/har10079_fm.html>
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 1999 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|
|  |
| Back to text |
|  |
| Back to text |
|  |
| Back to text |
|  |
| Back to text |
|