|
Editorial
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: causes and control?
The overriding emphasis should be on control of antibiotic use in
humans and animals
MJA 1999; 171: 117-118
→ Other articles have cited this article
| |
This issue of the Journal contains three articles on the emergence and
control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Clinical
infection with VRE was first noted in England and France in
1986,1,2 and was first detected in
Australia (in Melbourne) in 1994.3 To September 1998, 69
sporadic and outbreak-associated strains had been identified in
patients from most Australian States.4 The spread of VRE brings us
ever closer to the appearance of high-level vancomycin resistance in
Staphylococcus aureus, lending urgency to efforts to
control VRE.
|
|
How is vancomycin resistance selected and amplified?
In all types of antibiotic resistance, bacterial clones that carry
the resistance factor are selected and expanded (amplified) by the
selective pressure of antibiotic exposure. In the case of VRE,
resistance can also be transferred horizontally between animal and
human enterococcal strains by transposons4 (see Box). Of even greater
concern is the experimentally demonstrated ability of these
transposons to transfer vancomycin resistance to the major human
pathogen, S. aureus.6 The specific pressures that
have led to vancomycin resistance appear to differ between
geographical areas and types of resistance.
VanA resistance: As summarised by Collignon,7 use of the glycopeptide avoparcin as a growth promoter in
farmed animals in Europe, coupled with the presence of the vanA
transposon, has fuelled remarkable selection and amplification
of VRE in animals. Vancomycin resistance has spread to human
populations (and their enterococci) via the food chain. The strength
of evidence for this has been assessed at level III-1 (well designed,
non-randomised, controlled trials).8 However, a second
amplification step through medical use of glycopeptides in humans is
necessary for VRE to emerge as a clinical problem, while lowered
defence is usually required for enterococci to cause human disease.
The low incidence of clinical VRE infections in most European
countries appears related to low medical use of glycopeptides and
other antibiotics. Alternatively, transferred animal VRE strains
may be less able to cause human disease (although outbreaks of
vanA VRE disease have occurred in England9).
The relatedness of vanA VRE strains across the world
has been examined. The coding sequence of the vanA
transposon, Tn1546, comprises over 10 000 base-pairs, but,
remarkably, only a single nucleotide difference in this sequence has
been documented in the many strains examined to date from the United
States and Europe.10 This suggests that the
vanA transposon emerged through a complex chain of events
that occurred only once, and was then transferred to many strains.
While the coding sequences of the vanA transposon are
strongly conserved, the non-coding insertion sequences (IS) are
more variable. Mapping has shown that some US and European
vanA strains have identical IS arrangements, indicating a
recent common origin.9-11 As vanA VRE
appeared in New York soon after their appearance in
Europe,12 it is likely they were
carried to the US (and later to Australia) from Europe in food,
livestock or humans. In the US, avoparcin was never used, and VRE has
spread among hospitalised patients, with insignificant community
colonisation.13
VanB resistance: The epidemiology of vanB
vancomycin resistance is largely unknown. In Europe, vanB
VRE have been isolated infrequently from humans and never, as yet,
from animals or food.8 A small study comparing US
and European vanB strains found their Tn1547
transposons to be distinct by restriction mapping.14 More recent
data indicate that there are at least three vanB genotypes (Dr
Robin Patel, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, USA, personal
communication). This greater diversity implies that vanB
emerged earlier than vanA.
What is Australia's position? In Australia, relative use of
glycopeptides in humans and animals strongly resembles that in
Europe, where avoparcin has been largely responsible for VRE
amplification in animals. As yet, there has been very limited study of
VRE in local animal populations, and local VRE strains have not been
subtyped by transposon mapping nor compared with overseas strains.
Nonetheless, given that VRE strains carrying the vanA and
vanB transposons have been isolated in
Australia,4 and that these transposons
do not emerge by mutation, they must have been imported. Once here,
enterococci carrying these transposons may well have been amplified
in animals exposed to avoparcin, and passed through the food chain to
humans in a manner similar to that in Europe. Community-acquired VRE
carriage has been observed at a low level in Victoria,15 and at least
one study found vanA and vanB VRE in animal
populations.16 The extent of community
and animal colonisation in Australia urgently needs
quantification.
In Australia, in contrast to Europe, most documented human VRE
colonisation and disease has been with polyclonal vanB
strains. The diverse range of strains implies that there has been
either widespread amplification and transfer of VRE transposons
within Australia or importation of multiple strains. However, in
some regions, clonal strains of vanA VRE have been
responsible for hospital-related outbreaks, similar to the
US17
and UK9 situations.
|
|
How does cross-infection occur in healthcare settings?
Enterococci are ubiquitous gastrointestinal and genital tract
bacteria that readily contaminate and persist in hospital
environments. Healthcare workers who comply poorly with
handwashing are vectors for patient-to-patient transfer of these
bacteria. Equipment and contaminated environments have also been
identified as important modes of spread in some acute care
settings.18,19 Patients receiving
antibiotics usually lose normal protective flora, increasing their
risk of colonisation with nosocomial strains of enterococci and
other resistant bacteria. Intensive care, organ transplant, renal,
haematology and oncology patients are particularly at risk from VRE
disease and require protection from inadvertent colonisation.
|
|
How can VRE be controlled?
The overriding emphasis must be on control of antibiotic use. In
whatever situation, animal or human, use of glycopeptides will
amplify vancomycin resistance, increasing the potential for its
eventual transfer to S. aureus.
Avoparcin restriction: Collignon has highlighted viable
alternatives to use of avoparcin in animals, and Australia should act
urgently as a precautionary measure to eliminate or at least restrict
avoparcin use.
Control of human antibiotic use: This should go further than
the restrictions on vancomycin recommended by the Hospital
Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.20
Broad-spectrum antibiotics, particularly third-generation
cephalosporins, have been identified as independent risk factors
for VRE colonisation and also play an important role in amplifying
methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Use of
broad-spectrum antibiotics should be reduced whenever possible.
The incidence of nosocomial disease caused by MRSA, VRE and
Clostridium difficile is a valuable "ecological" indicator
for hospitals, providing early warning of an adverse
antibiotic-created environment. Evidence from the US shows the
effectiveness of antibiotic control in reducing the incidence of VRE
and C. difficile.21
Regular auditing of antibiotic use can assist hospital drug
committees to define areas for targeted intervention. Robertson and
colleagues examined detailed reasons for
vancomycin use in five metropolitan hospitals in
Victoria.22 They highlight
unnecessarily prolonged use of vancomycin in empirical and
prophylactic therapy, both amenable to intervention. Their study
should be repeated at other Australian hospitals.
VRE infection control procedures: As VRE are already
widespread, albeit uncommon, in many animal and human populations,
eradication is not possible. To ensure early detection and
containment of VRE, a targeted approach is needed among patients most
at risk from VRE disease. Grayson and colleagues describe such an approach.23 After identification of
clinical vanB VRE infection in a renal patient, their
hospital took measures to prevent a potential outbreak. Screening of
at-risk groups for faecal VRE colonisation, which found nine
additional isolates of vanB VRE, and review of antibiotic use
appear to have been successful in containing VRE.22
The temptation to screen for VRE colonisation in low-risk patients
should be resisted, as few of those identified will develop disease,
but the hospital and patient must carry the considerable respective
financial and psychological burdens. In low-risk groups, it is more
worthwhile to focus initially on assessment and modification of
antibiotic use.
John K Ferguson
Director of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW
- Uttley AH, Collins CH, Naidoo J, George RC. Vancomycin-resistant
enterococci. Lancet 1988; 1: 57-58.
-
Leclercq R, Derlot E, Duval J, Courvalin P. Plasmid-mediated
resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus
faecium. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 157-161.
-
Kamarulzaman A, Tosolini FA, Boquest AL, et al.
Vancomycin-resistant Enteroccus faecium infection in a
liver transplant recipient [abstract]. Aust N Z J Med 1995:
25; 560.
-
Bell J, Turnidge J, Coombs G, O'Brien F. Emergence and epidemiology
of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Australia. Commun Dis
Intell 1998; 22: 249-252.
-
Arthur M, Molinas C, Depardieu F, Courvalin P. Characterization of
Tn1546, a Tn3-related transposon conferring
glycopeptide resistance by synthesis of depsipeptide
peptidoglycan precursors in Enterococcus faecium BM4147.
J Bacteriol 1993; 175: 117-127.
-
Noble WC, Virani Z, Cree RGA. Co-transfer of vancomycin and other
resistance genes from Enterococcus faecalis NCTC 12201 to
Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1992;
93: 195-198.
-
Collignon PJ. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and use of
avoparcin in animal feed: is there a link? Med J Aust 1999; 171:
144-146.
-
Ferguson JK, Dalton CB, McGettigan P, Hill S. Antimicrobial
resistance in animal enteric bacteria and human disease -- a review of
the scientific literature. Commissioned report to the Joint Expert
Technical Advisory Committee on Antibiotic Resistance. Canberra;
National Health and Medical Research Council, 1998.
-
Woodford N, Adebiyi AMA, Palepou MFI, Cookson BD. Diversity of
vanA glycopeptide resistance elements in enterococci from
humans and non human sources. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
1998; 42: 502-508.
-
Jensen LB. Differences in the occurrence of two base pair variants
of Tn1546 from vancomycin-resistant enterococci from
humans, pigs, and poultry. Antimicrob Agents Chemother
1998; 42: 2463-2464.
-
Jensen LB, Ahrens P, Dons L, et al. Molecular analysis of
Tn1546 in Enterococcus faecium isolated from
animals and humans. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 437-442.
-
Frieden TR, Munsiff SS, Low DE, et al. Emergence of
vancomycin-resistant enterococci in New York City. Lancet
1993; 342: 76-79.
-
Leclercq R, Courvalin P. Resistance to glycopeptides in
enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24: 545-555.
-
Dahl KH, Simonsen GS, Olsvik O, Sundsfjord A. Heterogeneity in the
vanB gene cluster of genomically diverse clinical strains of
vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob Agents
Chemother 1999; 43: 1105-1110.
-
Lyddy MM, Smith HJ, Baird RW. Isolation of vancomycin-resistant
enterococci in community-based patients [abstract]. Microbiol
Aust 1998; 19 (4): A92.
-
Butt H, Bell J, Ferguson JK. Are vancomycin-resistant
enterococci prevalent in Hunter region farm animals? [abstract].
Microbiol Aust 1997; 18(4): P04.8.
-
Robson J, Allen A, Jennings A, et al. The emergence of vancomycin
resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) in an Australian
hospital -- clinical and epidemiological features [abstract].
Aust N Z J Med 1998; 28: 712.
-
Bonten MJ, Hayden MK, Nathan C, et al. Epidemiology of
colonisation of patients and environment with
vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet 1996; 348:
1615-1619.
-
Livornese LL, Dias S, Samel C, et al. Hospital-acquired infection
with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium
transmitted by electronic thermometers. Ann Int Med 1992;
117: 112-116.
-
HICPAC committee. Recommendations for preventing the spread of
vancomycin resistance: recommendations of the Hospital Infection
Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Am J Infect
Control 1995; 23: 87-94.
-
Quale J, Landman D, Saurina G, et al. Manipulation of a hospital
antimicrobial formulary to control an outbreak of
vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis 1996;
23: 1020-1025.
-
Robertson MB, Dartnell JGA, Korman TM, on behalf of the Victorian
Drug Usage Evaluation Group. Vancomycin and teicoplanin use in
Victorian hospitals. Med J Aust 1999; 171: 127-131.
-
Grayson ML, Grabsch EA, Johnson PDR, et al. Outcome of a screening
program for vancomycin-resistant enterococcci in a hospital in
Victoria. Med J Aust 1999; 171: 133-136.
©MJA 1999
Make a
comment
Other articles have cited this article:
Michael J Richards, Marion B Robertson, Jonathan G A Dartnell, Margarida M Duarte, Nicholas R Jones,
Dale A Kerr, Lyn-Li Lim, Peter D Ritchie, Graham J Stanton and Simone E Taylor. Impact of a web-based antimicrobial approval system on
broad-spectrum cephalosporin use at a teaching hospital Med J Aust 2003; 178 (8): 386-390. [Research] <http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/178_08_210403/ric10555_fm.html>
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 1999 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|
| | Genetic basis of vancomycin resistance
Four types of vancomycin resistance in enterococci have been described: vanA, vanB, vanC and vanD. The commonest, vanA, is encoded by a complex mobile genetic element (transposon Tn1546) that contains nine genes responsible for high-level resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin, including the vanA gene.5 The vanB type (medium-level vancomycin resistance, but teicoplanin susceptibility) is encoded similarly on another transposon, Tn1547, which contains the vanB gene in place of vanA.
Location of the vancomycin-resistance genes on transposons is significant, as these mobile elements (or "jumping genes") can copy themselves to different locations on the bacterial chromosome, extrachromosomal plasmids and bacteriophages, and can transfer to other bacteria via mechanisms such as conjugation.
|
|
| Back to text |
|