Click Here!

  eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access   

The Research Enterprise

Nature, nurture and my experience with smallpox eradication

A career influenced by chance events

Frank Fenner

MJA 1999; 171: 638-641

Introduction - Family and education - Infectious diseases - Myxomatosis - The Intensified Smallpox Eradication Programme - References - Career outline - Why smallpox could be eradicated - Remaining problems with smallpox - Subsequent eradication programs - Authors' details
Make a comment - Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail - Current contents list - More articles on Infectious diseases and parasitology


Introduction I believe that nature (one's genes) and nurture (one's upbringing and education) play equal roles in the life of every person, and that chance plays a critical part in the course of that life. I will try to analyse how these three elements contributed to my role in the global eradication of smallpox.



Family and education
My parents were both talented people, born in Victoria of migrant (predominantly German) parents, and educated at the Melbourne Teachers College and the University of Melbourne. I was the second of five children. When I was two years old my father was appointed Superintendent of Technical Education in South Australia. He had been educated in geology and biology and pursued research in physiography that gained him a DSc from the University of Melbourne. He continued scientific work in his spare time, producing both university-level and school books on the geography of South Australia and scientific papers on physiography and australites, writing science notes each fortnight for a Melbourne magazine, The Australasian, and producing three books of essays on scientific topics.

Influenced by my father, I accumulated a good collection of fossils, and wished to study geology. However, he persuaded me that career prospects for geologists were very poor and that medicine offered a great variety of possible careers, including research, which I even then contemplated. As well as being active in university life and sport (hockey and tennis), I became involved with the University of Adelaide - South Australian Museum anthropological expeditions from my second year in university onwards. My MD degree was based on this work and studies on Aboriginal skulls.

After graduating in December 1938, I became a resident medical officer at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, where I heard Prime Minister Robert Menzies announce, on 3 September 1939, that Australia was at war with Germany. Most of my fellow residents enlisted. However, for reasons that I cannot recall, I decided to study for a Diploma of Tropical Medicine at the University of Sydney before I enlisted. If this is viewed as a chance event, it certainly had a major effect on my career. The skills that I acquired led to my appointment, in 1942, as pathologist to the 2/2 Australian General Hospital, a 1200-bed hospital near Hughenden in central north Queensland, and in 1943 as a malariologist in Papua New Guinea.

A chance consequence of my transfer to this hospital was meeting my future wife. She was a nursing sister who worked as a transfusion expert and was awarded an Associate Royal Red Cross (a military award given to nurses in the armed forces for outstanding services) for her work. Because at Hughenden there was not a great call for transfusions, she worked part-time in my laboratory, helping with malaria diagnosis. She was subsequently a tower of strength in the social aspects of my role as a departmental head and director of the John Curtin School, as well as raising our family and being involved in community work.



Infectious diseases
My experience with malaria, scrub typhus and dengue in Papua New Guinea awakened an interest in infectious diseases, and led directly to my first post-war job, at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute. Its Director, Macfarlane Burnet, asked me to work on the experimental epidemiology of infectious ectromelia of mice, the viral cause of which he had just shown was related to vaccinia, and thus to smallpox virus. Scientifically, the most important aspect of this work was the observation, by chance, that non-fatal cases usually had a rash (thereafter we called the disease mousepox). This led to experiments on what happened during the incubation period of this disease, and, by analogy, during the long incubation periods of human diseases such as smallpox and chickenpox. Burnet also launched me on my career as a writer of books on scientific matters, a field exploited by very few experimental scientists, but in which Burnet was a master. We coauthored the second edition of The production of antibodies,2 which was later to become famous for the prediction of immunological tolerance, cited as the grounds for the award of the 1960 Nobel Prize to Burnet.

After two and a half years at the Hall Institute, Burnet arranged for me to work with the renowned bacteriologist RenŽ Dubos at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York. There, I worked on Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In February 1949, Sir Howard Florey offered me the foundation Chair of Microbiology in the John Curtin School of Medical Research (JCSMR), in the newly established Australian National University.

In 1950 Canberra was a very small town and, as there were no suitable laboratories there, the university had arranged with Burnet to allow me to work for a few years in the Hall Institute, where I continued with work on mycobacteria, principally on M. ulcerans, which had been discovered in Melbourne a few years earlier.3 Although I was anxious to work again on viruses, I had decided that I had skimmed the cream off mousepox.


Myxomatosis Early in 1951, myxomatosis spread throughout south-eastern Australia. As the CSIRO (the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), which was responsible for introducing the disease for rabbit control, had no virologists on its staff, I decided to make myxomatosis the main activity of my embryonic department. The virus concerned was also a poxvirus. Studies on myxomatosis, especially on changes in its virulence and the resistance of rabbits to it, were the focus of my research for the next 14 years, and provided the best natural experiment on the co-evolution of viral virulence and host resistance available for a disease of vertebrates.

Initially, myxoma virus was extraordinarily virulent, killing over 99% of naturally infected rabbits. I was anxious to study the genetics of virulence of this poxvirus. However, myxoma virus was difficult to work with in the laboratory, so I screened strains of Orthopoxvirus, the genus to which smallpox virus belongs, and selected a variant of vaccinia virus called rabbitpox virus. Rabbitpox virus yielded many white-pock mutants, which I used to demonstrate molecular recombination. By 1962 sufficient data on myxomatosis had accumulated for me to collaborate with CSIRO zoologist Francis Ratcliffe on the book Myxomatosis.4 Another chance event associated with books occurred about this time, again with Burnet. In 1955 he had written The principles of animal virology,5 a second edition of which was published in 1960. In 1964 the publishers approached him for a third edition; he suggested that they approach me. Looking over The principles of animal virology, I decided that I could not write a third edition of Burnet's book, and offered instead to write another book on much the same topic, entitled The biology of animal viruses.6

Publication of this book (in 1968) influenced my subsequent career. To produce it required giving up full-time laboratory work. The year I finished writing this tome (1967), the then Dean of JCSMR resigned. I was faced with a choice of essentially starting benchwork again, to all intents and purposes as a "PhD student", or seeking the directorship of JCSMR. I chose the latter, and was appointed in September 1967.



The Intensified Smallpox Eradication Programme
The same year was notable for the launch of the Intensified Smallpox Eradication Programme. In 1968 the Chief of the Smallpox Eradication Unit of the World Health Organization (WHO), D A Henderson, invited me to join an international group of virologists with expertise in poxviruses, to discuss the possibility that monkeys with monkeypox virus (discovered a few years earlier in a monkey colony in Copenhagen) might constitute an animal reservoir of smallpox virus. We met in Moscow in March 1969, commencing an association with the Intensified Smallpox Eradication Programme that has continued to this day. I attended meetings of this committee every second year, initially as rapporteur and then as chairman. My main scientific contribution was to use my experience with white-pock mutants of rabbitpox virus to dispose of the hypothesis that smallpox virus was a white-pock mutant of monkeypox virus.

During this period my term as Director of the JCSMR came to an end and I became Director of the Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies. I resigned from most committees concerned with medicine and took on new responsibilities in the environment field, but maintained contact with the Intensified Smallpox Eradication Programme.

Apart from a visionary suggestion by Edward Jenner in 1801, the first proposal to eradicate smallpox had been made in 1953 by the first Director-General of WHO, Dr Brock Chisholm, but the World Health Assembly dismissed his proposal as unrealistic. Smallpox was again considered by the Assembly in 1958, when the Soviet Union put forward a carefully planned proposal for eradication, which was endorsed by the Assembly. The Russian suggestion was that global eradication could be achieved in 4 to 5 years by vaccinating and revaccinating up to 80% of the population of every endemic country, to produce a level of herd immunity sufficient to break the chains of transmission.

By 1966 it was clear that progress along these lines, while successful in several small countries, would never achieve global eradication, and the Assembly adopted, by a narrow margin, a resolution which included acceptance of the need for central coordination of national programs and WHO finance from its regular budget. The Intensified Smallpox Eradication Programme was launched in 1967, to be coordinated by a Smallpox Eradication Unit at WHO Headquarters in Geneva and with the goal of global eradication within 10 years. This effort was led by D A Henderson and Isao Arita (Assistant Chief and, from 1976 to 1982, Chief of the Smallpox Eradication Unit). Success was achieved in October 1977, just a few months after the target date.

In 1967 smallpox was endemic in 31 countries and imported cases had been reported in another 11 countries; there were probably 15 to 20 million cases of smallpox annually, with some two million deaths. The first problem facing the Smallpox Eradication Unit was to ensure that all vaccine used in the field was of acceptable potency. WHO Reference Centres for Smallpox Vaccine were established in Toronto, Canada, and Bilthoven, The Netherlands, an international meeting of vaccine producers was held, and training courses established. Regular quality control testing by the centres was applied to vaccine donated through WHO, donated under bilateral aid programs, and produced in the endemic countries themselves. By 1970 these measures had ensured that most of the vaccine used in the program reached WHO standards for potency, heat stability and bacterial content.

The other major change in strategy was the elevation of surveillance and containment to a pre-eminent place. Discovery of a case was followed by containment by vaccination of all contacts, and then for all persons, in ever-increasing distances from the affected household. Associated with containment, an attempt was made to discover the source of the index case and follow this up with vaccination in that village.

By systematically applying these strategies, and by dint of a great deal of hard work and some good luck, smallpox was progressively eliminated from each of the countries in which it had been endemic in 1967. Concurrently with the elimination of smallpox from countries, groups of countries or continents, a system of "certification" of eradication by teams of independent international experts was developed. I served as a member of some of these teams and in 1977 was asked to chair a Global Commission for the Certification of Smallpox Eradication. I became more fully involved with the certification program, and, as well as serving on the International Commissions for India and Malawi, carried out inspections in China, South Africa and Namibia, countries then not members of WHO.

On the afternoon of Sunday, 9 December 1979, after four days of intensive discussion and argument, all members of the Global Commission accepted its final report.7 This proclaimed that the world had been freed of smallpox. The report also made 19 recommendations on vaccination, vaccine stocks, stocks of smallpox virus, monkeypox, publications and the like. On 8 May 1980, I presented this report to the World Health Assembly; it was accepted with acclamation.

My association with the smallpox eradication program did not end there, for I was appointed chairman of the Committee on Orthopoxvirus Infections, which monitored the implementation of the recommendations and has continued to meet periodically as an ad hoc committee until this year.

More demanding was my involvement with fulfilling the recommendation that a book about the program should be produced. Influenced by my father's example and my parents' genes, I had by this time published several scientific books, so I looked forward to this prospect. I had now (1980) formally retired and applied myself full-time to this task, assisted by the three former heads of the Smallpox Eradication Unit. Eight years later, in January 1988, a massive book of almost 1500 pages, Smallpox and its eradication,8 was launched at a meeting of the Executive Board of WHO. Later that year three of the authors, Henderson, Arita and I, shared the Japan Prize, given that year for preventive medicine.


References
  1. Friedman M, Friedland GW. Edward Jenner and vaccination. In: Medicine's 10 greatest discoveries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998; 65-93.
  2. Burnet FM, Fenner F. The production of antibodies. 2nd edition. Melbourne: Macmillan, 1949.
  3. MacCallum P, Tolhurst JC, Buckle G, Sissons HA. A new mycobacterial infection in man. J Path Bact 1948; 60: 93-116.
  4. Fenner F, Ratcliffe FN. Myxomatosis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.
  5. Burnet FM. Principles of animal virology. New York: Academic Press, 1955.
  6. Fenner F. The biology of animal viruses. New York: Academic Press, 1968.
  7. World Health Organization. The global eradication of smallpox. Final Report of the Global Commission for the Certification of Smallpox Eradication, Geneva, 1979. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
  8. Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, et al. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1988.

Box 1: Career outline -- Frank Fenner
Box 2: Why small could be eradicated
Box 3: Remaining problems with smallpox
Box 4: Subsquent eradication programs



Authors' details
John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.
Frank Fenner, MB BS, MD, Visiting Fellow.

Reprints will not be available from the author.
Correspondence: Professor F Fenner, John Curtin School of Medical Research, GPO Box 334, Canberra, ACT 2601.
fennerATjcsmr.anu.edu.au

©MJA 1999
Make a comment

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  


Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further reproduction or distribution of the articles should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For permission, contact the Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".

<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/> © 1999 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate your comments.


Painting
Jenner vaccinating a child, reprinted with permission from
The illustrated history of medicine, by Jean-Charles Sournia.
Published by Harold Stark. The observation of Jenner that
led to the use of cowpox in vaccination for smallpox has been
ranked among medicine's 10 greatest discoveries.
1
 
Photo of baby with small Pox
Illustration: The smallpox recognition card
was widely used from 1971 onwards by field workers
looking for cases of smallpox. This card was used in the
Indian subcontinent; similar cards using local cases were
used in Ethiopia and other African countries.
 
1: Career outline - Frank Fenner

Born: Ballarat, Victoria, 21 December 1914

Education: MBBS(Adel), 1938; MD(Adel) 1942; DTM(Syd), 1940

Australian Army Medical Corps, May 1940 to January 1946

Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, February 1946 to August 1948

Professor of Microbiology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, July 1949 to September 1967

Photo of Frank Fenner
Frank Fenner assaying pox viruses on the
chorioallantoic membrane of the developing
chick embryo, about 1958
Director, John Curtin School of Medical Research, September 1967 to May 1973

Director, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, May 1973 to December 1979

University Fellow, John Curtin School of Medical Research, 1980 to 1982

Visiting Fellow, John Curtin School of Medical Research since 1982

Back to text

 
2: Why smallpox could be eradicated

Biological factors

  1. A severe disease, with high mortality and serious after-effects
  2. No animal reservoir of the virus
  3. Very few subclinical cases
  4. Cases were not infectious before the appearance of rash, which appeared after the onset of illness and fever
  5. An acute, self-limited disease; recurrence of infectivity never occurred
  6. Only one serotype
  7. An effective, heat-stable vaccine was available and inexpensive

Sociopolitical factors

  1. Country-wide elimination in Europe and the Americas showed that global eradication was possible
  2. Few social or religious barriers to the recognition of cases
  3. The costs of quarantine and vaccination of travellers provided a strong financial incentive for wealthy countries to contribute
  4. The WHO Smallpox Eradication Unit had inspiring leaders and enlisted many devoted health workers
Back to text

 
3: Remaining problems with smallpox

Widespread use of variola virus in diagnostic laboratories in many countries made it necessary to accept interruption of transmission rather than destruction of virus as the criterion for eradication.

In 1983 virus was eliminated from all laboratories, except at the two WHO Collaborating Centres for Smallpox Diagnosis, in Atlanta, and Moscow. In spite of repeated recommendations of the WHO Committee on Orthopoxvirus Infections, these stocks have not been destroyed.

Between 1972 and 1992 the Soviet Union conducted a very extensive biological warfare (BW) program; in 1980 variola virus was added to this program.

With the closure of at least the civilian section of the Russian program in 1992, many scientists with BW expertise became unemployed and may have sold information. The United States Senate was told in 1995 that at least 17 countries operate covert BW programs.

Reserve stocks of vaccine are now over 20 years old and quite small. Quick methods of vaccine production (in skin of calves or sheep) are no longer acceptable in industrialized countries and there is concern about the side-effects of the vaccine.

Efforts are being made by WHO to overcome the vaccine problems and, as a longer-term defence, to develop an effective drug therapy for smallpox before destruction of stocks, proposed for 2002.
Back to text

 
4: Subsequent eradication programs

Following the success of smallpox eradication, WHO has endorsed eradication programs for poliomyelitis, dracunculiasis (Guinea worm) and measles. For different reasons, each is more difficult to eradicate than smallpox.

Poliomyelitis
  • Widespread when program initiated in 1988.
  • High proportion of subclinical cases makes certification of eradication difficult. This necessitated (1) comprehensive laboratory networks and sophisticated diagnostic methods; (2) development of a system of reporting and checking all cases of acute flaccid paralysis.
  • Eradication achieved in the Americas, Europe and the Western Pacific Region

Dracunculiasis

  • Initially confined to a few countries in South America and the Middle East and many countries in Africa.
  • Initial strategy (improvement of water supply) was replaced by faster and cheaper interventions of health education and use of cloth filters to remove minute crustacean carriers.
  • Because of civil disturbances, difficulties remain in Africa, especially Sudan.

Measles

  • Spreads more readily than smallpox and is transmissible before onset of rash.
  • Vaccination of newborns ineffective because of maternal antibody, but later vaccinations may leave window of opportunity for natural infection. Follow-up vaccination of adolescents desirable.
Back to text