To the Editor: Climate change has an adverse impact on health.1 Procurement, waste production, transport, and energy and water consumption (ie, the ecological “footprint”) all contribute to climate change. If the principle underpinning the work of all health professionals is “do no harm”, addressing the harmful effects of the health care industry on the natural environment must become a priority. We argue that one way to rapidly achieve this would be to mandate more sustainable practices as part of hospital accreditation.

The United Kingdom has specifically targeted its health system to reduce its large ecological footprint,2 but in Australia, progress towards environmental sustainability within health care is uncertain and unmonitored. The contribution by health care to Australia’s national carbon emissions is unclear, but we do know that, for example, Victoria’s public hospitals consume 60% of the total energy used by the state’s government departments,3 so we have the opportunity to make a major impact. There are excellent examples of hospital energy- and water-saving projects with financial recovery within 10 years.2,4

The Environment Protection Authorities of several Australian states are now mandating that heavy users of energy and water (including larger hospitals) have Environment and Resource Efficiency Plans to reduce their footprints,5 but action from hospitals has been unclear. Progress has typically been made on an ad-hoc basis by hospitals acting in isolation, although the Institute of Hospital Engineering, Australia is facilitating a more systematic approach.4

The Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS), through its Evaluation and Quality Improvement Program (EQuIP)6 accredits Australian hospitals against mandatory and preferred criteria. However, EQuIP does not currently include mandatory criteria that address issues such as energy, water and waste auditing, energy efficiency and the presence of a hospital environmental committee. The accreditation process offers an opportunity to encourage hospitals to prioritise these issues. The ACHS has awarded hospitals in the past for “environmental excellence”, but without a solid framework from the ACHS, the goal of all of our hospitals pursuing sustainability seems unlikely.

In 2009, it is out of step with Australia’s shift to a low-carbon future that there are no requirements that hospitals achieve more sustainable use of energy, water and transport, and improve procurement and waste reduction. The introduction of broad environmental standards as part of the accreditation process could be a vehicle for achieving rapid improvements in sustainability across the hospital sector and shift our health system to one that “does no harm”.