To the Editor: Waxman’s prompt recovery after a stroke was probably a stroke of luck,1 unless perhaps Saint Mary MacKillop was involved. Amid the conflicting evidence on the effect of thrombolysis on recovery in ischaemic stroke, one fact is beyond doubt — thrombolysis gives no greater improvement at 24 hours than placebo.2 It is the various measures of recovery at 3 months, and the risks of adverse outcomes from protocol violations in administering thrombolysis, that are less clear.
The full article is accessible to AMA
members and paid subscribers.
Login to MJA or subscribe now.
- Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, NSW.
Correspondence: brendon.smith@sswahs.nsw.gov.au
- 1. Waxman BP. A stroke of luck ... or just the ideal model of care? Med J Aust 2010; 193: 468. <eMJA full text> <MJA full text>
- 2. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1581-1587.
- 3. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischaemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1317-1329.
- 4. Ahmed N, Wahlgren N, Grond M, et al, for the SITS investigators. Implementation and outcome of thrombolysis with alteplase 3–4·5 h after an acute stroke: an updated analysis from SITS-ISTR. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 866-874.
- 5. Simpson MA, Dewey HM, Churilov L, et al. Thrombolysis for acute stroke in Australia: outcomes from the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke registry (2002–2008). Med J Aust 2010; 193: 439-443. <eMJA full text> <MJA full text>
Online responses are no longer available. Please refer to our instructions for authors page for more information.