Health authorities need to develop a nationally consistent, sensible, ethical and jurisdictionally feasible process for disposal of educational human bone sets
The study of anatomy is integral to the study of medicine. It lies at an interface between the need for body parts for research and education and the ethical responsibility to show respect for the dead.1 In the 20th century, human skeletons were acquired on a mass scale as medical students were encouraged to purchase sets of human bones. Attempts to institute a legal market were overtaken by traders using illicit international sources, particularly India, as demand outstripped supply.2 The ethical, legal and practical issues were largely ignored.3
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Jones DG. The ethical awakening of human anatomy: reassessing the past and envisioning a more ethical future. In: Squires K, Errickson D, Márquez‐Grant N editors. Ethical approaches to human remains: a global challenge in bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Springer International Publishing, 2019: 73–94.
- 2. Carney S. The red market: on the trail of the world’s organ brokers, bone thieves, blood farmers, and child traffickers. New York: Harper Collins Publishing, 2011.
- 3. Fineman M. Living off the dead is a dying trade in Calcutta. Los Angeles Times 1991; 19 Feb. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la‐xpm‐1991‐02‐19‐wr‐1711‐story.html (viewed June 2020).
- 4. Woodhead M. Medical skeletons prove hard to get rid of. Australian Doctor 2014; 17 Dec. https://www.ausdoc.com.au/news/medical‐skeletons‐prove‐hard‐get‐rid (viewed June 2020).
- 5. Jones DG, Whitaker M. The contested realm of displaying dead bodies. J Med Ethics 2013; 39: 652–653.
- 6. Smith ML, Jones JFX. Dual‐extrusion 3D printing of anatomical models for education. Anat Sci Educ 2018; 11: 65–72.
- 7. Claes T, Deblon V. When nothing remains: anatomical collections, the ethics of stewardship and the meanings of absence. J Hist Collect 2018; 30: 351–362.
- 8. Human Tissue Act 1982 (Vic).
- 9. Bhardwaj DN, Millo T, Lalwani S. Skeleton used for anatomical study brought for medico‐legal autopsy: a case report. Med Sci Law 2007; 47: 86–87.
- 10. Chisholm A. Bones used for teaching by Warrandyte doctor subject of coronial inquest. Herald Sun 2014; 16 Dec. https://www.heraldsun.com.au/leader/east/bones‐used‐for‐teaching‐by‐warrandyte‐doctor‐subject‐of‐coronial‐inquest/news‐story/beb8a4fb6045fb4b630165338b34e261 (viewed June 2020).
- 11. Woo H. Is it time to take out your skeleton in the closet? KevinMD 2015; 24 Oct. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2015/10/is‐it‐time‐to‐take‐out‐your‐skeleton‐in‐the‐closet.html (viewed June 2020).
- 12. Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web‐based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 32.
- 13. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act 1984 (Cth) s 3(1).
- 14. Buchanan K. Australia. In: Protection of Indigenous heritage in selected jurisdictions. Law Library of Congress, 2019. https://www.loc.gov/item/2019668147/ (viewed June 2020).
We thank Julian Savulescu for his insights regarding the ethics issues raised.
No relevant disclosures.