Biases and assumptions often arise from past experiences and, when unquestioned, can negatively influence the development of effective educational strategies
Knowledge is frequently considered as the panacea for all ills, and its acquisition is often proposed as the solution for ensuring we deliver the best quality health care. For example, training and continuing professional development (CPD) have been proposed as the first steps for medical colleges to address some troubling variations in health care practice in Australia.1 However, while proposing educational strategies to address health outcomes is logical, appropriate and defensible, it is well established that “knowing” something is quite different from “doing” something.2 Nevertheless, CPD curricula are frequently limited to “knowing”.3 While knowledge is a key prerequisite to transforming practice, how do we maximise CPD effectiveness as a strategy to improve care? And is changing individual practice through education all that is needed to change health practices and outcomes?4
The full article is accessible to AMA members and paid subscribers. Login to read more or purchase a subscription now.
Please note: institutional and Research4Life access to the MJA is now provided through Wiley Online Library.
- 1. Francombe H, Buchan HA, Duggan A. Health care variation: the next challenge for clinical colleges. Med J Aust 2017; 207: 277–278. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2017/207/7/health-care-variation-next-challenge-clinical-colleges
- 2. Le Maistre C, Paré A. Learning in two communities: the challenge for universities and workplaces. Journal of Workplace Learning 2004; 16: 44–52.
- 3. Boud D, Hager P. Re‐thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practices. Stud Contin Educ 2012; 34: 17–30.
- 4. Whitehead C, Kuper A, Webster F. The conceit of curriculum. Med Educ 2012; 46: 534–536.
- 5. Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N et al. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis. BMJ 2014; 348: g3725.
- 6. Schuwirth LWT, Durning SJ. Educational research: current trends, evidence base and unanswered questions. Med J Aust 2018; 208: 161–163. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2018/208/4/educational-research-current-trends-evidence-base-and-unanswered-questions
- 7. Hager P. Metaphors of workplace learning: more process, less product. Fine Print 2004; 27: 7–10.
- 8. Husmann PR, O'Loughlin VD. Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anat Sci Educ 2018; https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1777. [Epub ahead of print]
- 9. Bohmer RM, Edmonson AC. Organizational learning health care. Health Forum J 2001; 44: 32–35.
- 10. Lingard L. What we see and don't see when we look at “competence”: notes on a god term. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009; 14: 625–628.
- 11. McAllister S, Lincoln MI, Ferguson A et al. A systematic program of research regarding the assessment of speech‐language pathology competencies. Int J Speech Lang Path 2011; 13: 6, 469–479.
- 12. Edmondson AC. Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13 (Suppl): ii3–ii9.
- 13. Allegranzi B, Gayet‐Ageron A, Damani N et al. Global implementation of WHO's multimodal strategy for improvement of hand hygiene: a quasi‐experimental study. Lancet 2013; 13: 843–851.
- 14. van Merrienboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 2010; 44: 85–93.
- 15. Hattie JAC. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge; 2009.
No relevant disclosures.