|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
David Isaacs and Craig M Mellis, on behalf of the Paediatric Special Interest Group of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases* and the Australasian Paediatric Respiratory Group**
MJA 1998; 168: 121-124
Introduction -
Epidemiology -
Childhood tuberculosis -
Child advocacy -
Control of tuberculosis -
Acknowledgements -
References -
Paediatric Special Interest Group of ASID -
Australasian Paediatric Respiratory Group -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
©MJA1998
Introduction |
Globally, tuberculosis (TB) is responsible for more deaths per year
than any other infection. The World Health Organization estimated
that in 1990 there were 7.5 million new cases of TB; 1.3 million were in
children under 15 years of age, of whom 450 000 died.1 TB is relatively rare in Australian
children, but, because of the associated high morbidity and
mortality and the risk of later reactivation of disease, it should not
be neglected. This paper outlines strategies to control paediatric
TB.
Tuberculosis in childhood is different from that in adults, and requires different expertise. This position paper, a consensus by paediatric infectious disease and respiratory specialists, outlines strategies for managing childhood TB in Australia. A companion paper, in preparation, will address strategies applicable to New Zealand. A further paper will deal with specific details of management of paediatric tuberculosis, including diagnosis and treatment. |
Epidemiology |
While the incidence of TB in industrialised countries has fallen to
very low levels with improving living conditions, in the United
States the steady decline in incidence of TB has halted. From 1985 to
1992 there was a 20% increase in reported cases in both adults and
children1-4 (although this
situation has now improved5 ). Further, the US has experienced an increase in the prevalence of
infection with multidrug-resistant strains of TB.2,4 This increase was the result of an
association of HIV infection and TB, increasing poverty,
immigration from countries with high TB prevalence, and decreased
public health funding.4,5
The re-emergence of TB as a problem in the USA has caused other
industrialised countries to re-examine policies for the prevention
and management of this disease.
Tuberculosis is not presently a major problem in Australia. Its incidence has remained stable since 1986 at 5.5-6.0 cases per 100 000 population per year.6-9 The number of notified cases in children aged 0-14 years has fallen from 70 in 1991, to 45 in 1992, 37 in 1993, and 33 in 1994.7-9 Two childhood deaths from TB were notified in 1992; none have been notified since. While most TB notifications are made from New South Wales and Victoria, the rate of notifications is highest in the Northern Territory. The notification rate is lowest in non-indigenous Australian-born people (1.5-2.0 per 100 000), while Aboriginality is associated with a higher incidence (10-13 per 100 000).8,9 However, being born overseas is associated with an even higher incidence, which has been consistently reported at around 15 per 100 000 for the past three years.7-9 |
Childhood tuberculosis | Starke10 has emphasised the differences between paediatric and adult tuberculosis. Children generally have a much smaller bacterial population and there is less secondary resistance. Cavitary lesions are very rare, but children have a greater propensity for extrapulmonary disease. While children tolerate higher doses of medication relative to body weight, with lower rates of adverse reactions, paediatric formulations (syrups or soluble powders) are not always available. Paediatric tuberculosis is usually acquired from contact with an infected adult, and children with TB are generally at low risk of infecting others. |
Child advocacy |
In Australia, children with suspected or proven tuberculosis may be
managed by paediatricians, at adult chest clinics, or by specialists
in paediatric or adult infectious diseases.9 Given the low incidence of childhood
cases, this variety of attending specialists is not surprising and
does not necessarily mean that current management of paediatric TB is
inappropriate. In large cities there may be enough children with TB or
receiving preventive therapy to warrant specialised paediatric TB
clinics that combine both paediatric and public health expertise.
However, in many parts of Australia, children with TB or TB contact are
managed in chest clinics by chest physicians who are expert in
tuberculosis, but may lack paediatric knowledge and skills. On the
other hand, the regional paediatrician, with experience in
examining and managing children, may have little knowledge and
experience of childhood tuberculosis.
Although paediatric TB is rare, child contacts of adults with TB are much less rare, and preventive therapy of children requires expert knowledge and supervision.3,10 Guidelines on tuberculosis concentrate on adult aspects of TB, and tend to neglect paediatric aspects.11-13 As paediatricians are child advocates and experts in child health, they should be more involved in the care of children with TB,14 not necessarily as sole carers, but at least in consultation. Paediatricians can provide clinical expertise and advice in areas such as compliance with medication, particularly for very young children.
Recommendation:
|
Control of tuberculosis |
The most critical aspect of control of tuberculosis is the existence
of appropriate public health programs. The important strategies in
TB control are:
|
BCG vaccine |
Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine was first used in humans in
1921, and few attempts have been made since then to develop improved
vaccines against TB. BCG vaccine is moderately effective: a recent
meta-analysis15 gave its
protective efficacy as 50% against any TB disease, 64% against TB
meningitis, and 71% against death from TB. Occasional cases of TB
meningitis occur in children in Australia6-9 and might be prevented by BCG
vaccination.
The NHMRC TB Working Party currently recommends BCG vaccination for three groups of children:11
The NHMRC TB Working Party11 states that BCG vaccine should be considered for:
We believe these latter two "considerations" should be changed to "recommendations" to prevent occasional, but devastating, cases of tuberculosis in these children. In particular, neonates whose parents are from South-East Asia or the Indian subcontinent should be given BCG at birth. There is currently no information on how many children receive BCG vaccine in Australia each year, either as an absolute number or as a proportion of those eligible. Clearly, such information would be a great advantage in analysing BCG vaccine efficacy, and thus in evaluating the current NHMRC recommendations. The Australian Childhood Immunisation Register, implemented in 1996, monitors compliance with some vaccines, but not with BCG as yet. Studies are needed on the proportion of eligible children who receive BCG vaccine, and on side effects of BCG vaccination. Recommendations: We strongly urge the Federal Government to put in place mechanisms to
audit the number of children vaccinated with BCG vaccine each year.
|
Mantoux screening |
In Australia, Mantoux skin testing is usually performed with 10
tuberculin units of purified protein derivative (PPD), although one
unit only may be used if there is a high risk of TB.16 In the United States,17 Mantoux skin testing is performed
with five tuberculin units of PPD. US authorities' interpretation of
a positive Mantoux skin test is shown in the Box; there is currently no
recognised Australian interpretation of skin test positivity.
At present, the Committee on Infectious Diseases of the American Academy of Pediatrics (the "Red Book" committee)17 recommends annual tuberculin testing of children at high risk, but not of children at low risk. Six months of isoniazid preventive therapy is recommended for children who are Mantoux positive without disease,12 as this is as effective as nine months' duration of therapy18 and has a better risk-benefit analysis.19 While Australian children are not routinely tested with tuberculin, two recent surveys of the Mantoux status of 13-year-old20 and six-year-old21 Sydney schoolchildren showed t hat being born overseas was the major risk factor for being Mantoux-positive. In addition, the later the child left the country of birth, the greater the risk of being Mantoux- positive. Australian-born children with one or both parents born overseas were not at increased risk of being Mantoux- positive compared with Australian-born children of Australian-born parents. As most Mantoux-positive children in Australia were born overseas, it is important to screen children who are migrating to Australia from countries with a high prevalence of TB. Short visits (e.g., holidays) overseas are associated with a low risk of becoming infected with TB. Although short term visitors to Australia occasionally transmit TB, screening them would be extremely difficult, and this is not done routinely. However, screening might be indicated in special circumstances (e.g., a visitor from a high endemic area with chronic respiratory symptoms). Routine annual Mantoux screening is not justified by the available data. Recommendations: Children born in Australia should not be screened annually by
Mantoux testing.
Visitors to Australia from areas of high TB incidence should not be
routinely screened, but neonates exposed to such visitors should be
vaccinated with BCG.
Mantoux-positive children with no evidence of TB disease should be
given preventive therapy with isoniazid for six months.
|
Contact tracing | Diligent tracing of the adult source of paediatric TB infection through public health networks continues to be an important step in preventing the spread of TB. |
Appropriate duration of drug therapy |
The emergence of highly resistant and multiply resistant strains of
M. tuberculosis has re-emphasised the importance of good
management of TB, and the development of innovative management and
control strategies. The emergence of resistant strains is thought to
be the result of failure of patients with TB to complete courses of
chemotherapy. In New York, this was a consequence of failure to
supervise patients' therapy as a result of cuts in health funding in
the 1980s.4,5
In Australia, some States supervise all antituberculous therapy, while others use targeted supervision of patients considered to be at risk of being non-compliant. In general, there are insufficient public health staff to ensure supervision of preventive therapy with isoniazid. Continued supervision of therapy (either full or targeted supervision) is important to prevent the emergence of resistant strains in Australia, and requires funding. Recommendation:
|
This document has been discussed by the Writing Panel of the Paediatric Special Interest Group of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases (ASID), circulated to all members, and ratified by the ASID Council. It was discussed at the 1996 meeting of the Australasian Paediatric Respiratory Group, and circulated to all members for comment. It was sent to Dr Greg Stewart, Chair of the NHMRC Working Party on Towards elimination of tuberculosis II. Guidelines and protocols for controlling tuberculosis disease in Australia, and to the Public Health Association of Australia. | |
Acknowledgements | Helpful comments were received from Dr T Konstantinos, Dr Graeme Oliver, Dr Graham Simpson and Professor Louis Landau. |
References |
|
Reprints will not be available from the authors.
Correspondence:
Associate Professor D Isaacs, Department of Immunology and
Infectious Diseases, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children,
Westmead, NSW 2145.
E-mail: davidi AT rich.edu.au
Make a comment - ©MJA 1998
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |