|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Urology
→ More articles on Oncology
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
The best available evidence for making decisions about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening comes from two recent randomised trials, the larger and more robust of which showed that PSA screening reduced the risk of death from prostate cancer, but that the absolute benefit was small, and the chance of prostate cancer being diagnosed and treated (even if biologically unimportant) was increased by a much larger amount.
The important question is whether the small reduction in numbers of deaths outweighs the harms inherent in the diagnosis and treatment of many additional cancers.
Men considering screening should understand both its possible benefit and its possible harms, and that the harms are more immediate than any benefit.
The challenge for future research is to find a test that reliably detects prostate cancers that are curable if they are treated early and life-threatening if they are not.
Login or register to purchase access to the full article
|
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2009 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377