eMJA: Health information privacy and patient safety

To the Editor: There is danger of a perception developing that, to ensure patient confidentiality, quality assurance (QA) activities in health care should be regarded as research. The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) has delivered proposals for the review of the federal Privacy Act 1988 (Cwlth) that may lead to all but the most basic monitoring of health care activities being characterised as research.1 Recommendation 65–3 emphasises that “research” should include “the compilation or analysis of statistics” and the ALRC also stated that “some funding, management, planning, monitoring, improvement and evaluation activities also may be characterised as research”. This drives the possibility for policy interpretation of QA activities into the realm of research necessitating ethics approval and/or informed consent, rather than retaining the current level of exemption. Australian governments are crying out for increased transparency to improve safety, but labelling QA activities as formal research could seriously compromise and retard patient safety efforts.

NB: If you are registered with the eMJA, your username is the email address you have provided.
If you don't have a login, click here for subscription options. You will be prompted to create an account upon purchase.

AMA members can login using their AMA username and password.
If you don't know your AMA password, please contact the AMA on 02 6270 5400 or membership@ama.com.au, or try to retrieve your password at this address.

-->

The Medical Journal of Australia eMJA

Username:
Password:

Password forgotten? Click here What is my username?