|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
To the Editor: We all privately seek statistics that enable us to put ourselves in perspective (even if we keep the results to ourselves!), but I am now unsure where my sexual performance stands.1 On the one hand, I am told premature ejaculation affects at least one, and from time to time two, of every three males (is that the < 2 minutes version?), and on the other that there is a skewed distribution with a median of 5.4 minutes and a range of 0.55–44.1 minutes. I’m impressed by the aerobic fitness, never mind the sex.
It seems we have a continuously distributed, perhaps skewed, normal distribution of an apparently genetically determined variable, with which individual players (?70%) and their partners are dissatisfied at times. Is that not like height, or IQ? “Premature” ejaculation may not be caused by individual psychology, but it is defined by it: from our beginnings in the Garden of Eden we have always wanted more than we have!
The early sperm may not get the bird but historically it got its share of the ovum and thus has persisted over millennia. There may be a role for medicine in some extreme cases (as for “constitutional” dwarfism and gigantism, where being very different carries a significant psychological disadvantage), but for the rest are we not colluding to some extent with an escape from the reality of our limitations? How much of this is treatment and how much is performance enhancement?
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
dignam.paulATsaugov.sa.gov.au
In reply: Dignam queries the validity of treating early ejaculation that may simply be a variant of normal. However, if one in three men complain to us of premature ejaculation and how it affects their relationships, we listen. They may regard themselves as very different from other men and may become psychologically disadvantaged.
In our article we detailed various presentations of premature ejaculation (PE), including that of a subjective perception of PE although the intravaginal ejaculatory time is normal.1 In such cases, reassurance is an appropriate response. However, for men with primary PE, for whom ejaculation consistently occurs within 1 minute or even before vaginal penetration, there is a problem. This problem can be treated successfully to improve a relationship that may have been foundering. And, yes, this may mean performance enhancement unrelated to aerobic fitness.
If men are unsure where their sexual performance stands, they should ask their partner. After all, communication improves a loving relationship.
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Keogh Institute for Medical Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA.
bstuckeyATcyllene.uwa.edu.au
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377