|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Geriatrics
To the Editor: Although there are data on the population needs for residential aged-care facilities (RACFs)1 and models of engagement by general practitioners once someone is resident in a facility,2-4 there are ongoing administrative barriers for people trying to secure a place in an RACF. The aim of requesting data before admission is to provide continuity and quality of care, but the burden of paperwork currently falling on family members and GPs is of concern.
We initiated an audit when it became apparent that local acute public and private hospital inpatient units had a policy of insisting that once an inpatient was eligible for RACF residency, he or she was required to be placed on waiting lists for 8–10 different RACFs. As part of a broader project to coordinate better care at times of transition, all RACFs in southern Adelaide (feeder population 400 000) were approached to provide us with the forms that need to be completed before someone can be placed on their waiting list.
All 22 facilities in southern Adelaide provided a copy of the application pack that they normally give to a family member. A median of 4.5 forms had to be completed before a person could be placed on a waiting list (range, 0–13). The most frequently requested forms were an Aged Care Assessment Team form (17 facilities), an application form (15 facilities), a medical history form (12 facilities), and an assets declaration (9 facilities). One RACF required direct debit payment forms to be filled out before considering an application, and another required documentary evidence of funeral arrangements. By contrast, four RACFs required no forms at all.
GPs were responsible for the medical history form. This form was unique to each RACF, with the result that similar data had to be provided multiple times in different formats. GPs were also potentially required to witness several other forms for each different application.
There is an inherent challenge in balancing the need to run a financially viable RACF and provide best care from the moment a resident arrives with minimising the paperwork that frail spouses or busy family members are often expected to generate or replicate for many facilities simultaneously. These forms, most of which will never be used, create a burden on family members at an already stressful time.
An agreed national industry standard for an Aged Care Assessment Team form, an assets form and a medical history form (to be filled out once by a GP) would ease stress at arguably one of the more difficult transitions any person and his or her family can face.
1 Repatriation General Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
2 Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA.
david.currowATrgh.sa.gov.au
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377