eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Snapshot

Dejection: a novel cause of rejection?

Anthony J Penington
MJA 2003; 179 (11/12): 572

A 51-year-old man presented with non-healing ulceration at the site of a tattoo on his right leg. Some 8 years previously, in celebration of the victory of his favourite team, Carlton, in the Australian Football League Grand Final, he and a friend both had a picture of a stylised Carlton footballer tattooed on one of their legs. The tattooist did not have a navy blue pigment (the team’s colour) to tint the jersey, but improvised with another source of pigment.

The patient reported that about a year before presentation he had developed painful ulceration at the site of the tattoo. The ulcer had progressed and showed no signs of healing. Curiously, the ulceration had occurred at precisely the time when the club was undergoing a dramatic deterioration in its fortunes, as scandal and poor on-field performances saw the team fall to the bottom of the AFL ladder. My patient was just one of the many Carlton supporters who had become very disillusioned.

At presentation, there was a granulating ulcer within the tattoo that corresponded to the navy blue areas of the figure (Box), with mild surrounding inflammation. After discussion with the patient, it was decided to excise the ulcer and perform a skin graft. The graft suffered partial loss, associated with a Pseudomonas infection. The wound eventually healed, although at 1 year follow-up the patient complained of occasional itch and mild swelling in the graft.

Histology of the excised ulcer showed a dense lymphocytic infiltrate and multinucleated giant cells forming occasional granulomas, consistent with an immune response to the pigment. Black and yellow pigment was seen throughout the dermis and in histiocytes.

Discussion

A delayed immune response to tattoo pigments is well described. Generally this takes the form of a granulomatous reaction with swelling and irritation in the affected areas. Ulceration is unusual.

A delayed immune response can occur after laser treatment, or may be the first manifestation of systemic sarcoidosis. It can also begin spontaneously several years after having a tattoo, as happened in this case. But an immune rejection of a club’s colours by a disillusioned football supporter has not previously been contemplated as a cause of tattoo rejection.

  1. Bleehen SS. Disorders of skin colour. In: Champion RH, Burton JL, Burns DA, Breathnach SM, editors. Rook/Wilkinson/Ebling textbook of dermatology. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1998.
  2. Ashinoff R, Levine VJ, Soter NA. Allergic reactions to tattoo pigment after laser treatment. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 285-290. <PubMed>
  3. Kennedy C. Sarcoidosis presenting in tattoos. Clin Exp Dermatol 1976; 1: 395-399. <PubMed>

(Received 20 Oct 2003, accepted 23 Oct 2003)

Department of Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC.

Anthony J Penington, MB BS, FRACS, Senior Lecturer.

Correspondence: Dr Anthony J Penington, Department of Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, VIC 3065. a.peningtonATunimelb.edu.au

AntiSpam note: To avoid attracting spam mail robots, authors' email addresses on the MJA website are written with AT in place of the usual symbol, and we have removed "mail to" links. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address. We regret the inconvenience this entails. Lobby your government for more effective antispam regulations.

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2003 www.mja.com.au ISSN: 0025-729X

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA