mja.com.au | The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | MJA shop | MJA Careers | Contact | Topics | Search | RSS  | Login | Buy full access

Letters

Current prescribing patterns of bupropion in Australia

Christopher M Doran, Anthony P Shakeshaft, Jennifer A Gates, Julia E Fawcett and Richard P Mattick
MJA 2002 177 (3): 162

To the Editor: Bupropion hydrochloride was listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) on 1 February 2001 for use as short-term adjunctive therapy for high nicotine dependence, with the goal of maintaining abstinence. Supply is limited to one application per year, with no repeats, and a maximum quantity of 120 tablets at a dispensed cost of $238.95.

From the beginning of February to the end of December 2001, 351 772 bupropion prescriptions had been processed by the Health Insurance Commission (HIC) at a cost of $83.14 million.1 This is equivalent to about 2% of total PBS-related drug expenditure in Australia.2 Given this high cost, it is reasonable to consider the extent to which this investment represents value for money.

An important first step is to assess the penetration of bupropion into the population of regular smokers in Australia. One indicator of this is the proportion of regular smokers who have filled a bupropion prescription (Box). Estimates suggest that 22.8% of the population aged 20 years and over (25.2% males and 22.8% females) are current regular smokers.3 Seventy-three per cent (14 099 273) of the Australian population were aged 20 years or over in June 2001.4 Combining population and age-specific smoking prevalence estimates results in an estimated 3 198 738 current regular smokers aged 20 years and over. Given that the PBS guidelines allow for only one prescription of bupropion per smoker per year, an estimated 11% (351 772 prescriptions divided by 3 198 738 smokers) of current regular smokers filled a prescription for bupropion in 2001. Excluding smokers aged less than 20 years will have minimal effect on this estimate, as the incidence of high nicotine dependence in this group is likely to be low.

Applying this method to each State and Territory reveals marked variation between them in the apparent proportions of smokers filling a prescription for bupropion. For example, an estimated 16.5% of all smokers in Tasmania had such a prescription filled, compared with 8% in Victoria. Although data from the HIC may be incomplete,5 the same method is applied to each jurisdiction in compiling them. Key unanswered questions relate to the extent to which (i) smokers complete a full course of bupropion, (ii) the field effectiveness of bupropion in aiding smoking cessation is comparable with abstinence rates achieved in clinical trials, and (iii) bupropion is used in conjunction with a comprehensive treatment program. We are currently conducting research to examine such questions.

Characteristics of bupropion use in Australian States and Territories, February to December 2001, inclusive

ACT

WA

Vic

Tas

SA

Qld

NT

NSW

Total


Population (≥ 20 years)

225 797

1 372 378

3 550 348

338 108

1 110 897

2 602 539

131 542

4 767 664

14 099 273

Current regular smokers (≥ 20 years)

53 448

316 608

804 455

74 507

245 553

593 268

33 254

1 077 132

3 198 225

Bupropion prescriptions processed

4 470

46 186

64 482

12 279

32 455

81 619

3 803

106 478

351 772

Total cost of prescriptions processed

$1 043 863

$10 854 828

$15 253 431

$2 920 481

$7 713 913

$19 237 576

$881 709

$25 238 851

$83 144 652

Proportion of current regular smokers who used bupropion

8.4%

14.6%

8.0%

16.5%

13.2%

13.8%

11.4%

9.9%

11.0%

  1. PBS expenditure and prescriptions February 2001 to December 2001. Canberra: Department of Health and Aged Care, 2002. Available at <http://www.hic.gov.au/statistics/dyn_pbs/forms/pbs_tab1.shtml
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health expenditure bulletin no. 17: Australia's health services expenditure to 1999–00. Canberra: AIHW, 2001. (Catalogue No. HWE 18; Health and Welfare expenditure series No. 12.)
  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 1998 National drug strategy household survey: first results. Canberra: AIHW, 1999. (AIHW Catalogue No. PHE 15; Drug Statistics Series.)
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian population by age and sex, Australian States and Territories. Drug Statistics Series. Canberra: ABS, 2001. (Catalogue no. 3201.0.)
  5. Robertson J, Fryer JL, O'Connell DL, et al. Limitations of Health Insurance Commission (HIC) data for deriving prescribing indicators. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 419-424. <eMJA full text>

(Received 16 May 2002, accepted 13 Jun 2002)

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.

Christopher M Doran, PhD, Health Economist; Anthony P Shakeshaft, PhD, NHMRC Fellow; Jennifer A Gates, MPH, Research Officer; Julia E Fawcett, BSc(Hons), Research Officer; Richard P Mattick, PhD, Director.

Correspondence: Dr Christopher M Doran, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052. c.doranATunsw.edu.au


Home | Issues | MJA shop | Terms of use | MJA Careers | More... | Contact | Topics | Search | RSS 

mja.com.au | The Medical Journal of Australia  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2002 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377