|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→ Previous article in this issue
→ View contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Pharmacology
To the Editor: The recent article by Chapman et al1 and a case report published some years previously in the Journal2 indicated that hyponatraemia may occur during indapamide therapy. However, it should be noted that the data came from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting, and therefore can give no indication of the incidence or relative risk of hyponatraemia compared with other diuretics. Nor can it give the incidence of hyponatraemia as a proportion of side effects occurring during indapamide therapy.
The presentation of these data appears to cause some confusion, including an interpretation that hyponatraemia was more common with indapamide therapy than other diuretics.3 However, adverse events may be more likely to be reported for drugs which are usually well tolerated. Hyponatraemia led to discontinuation of therapy in only eight out of 3000 patients in the PROGRESS study.3,4 Previous controlled studies of indapamide (2.5 mg or sustained-release 1.5 mg daily) have found no significant overall changes in serum sodium levels.3
Hyponatraemia associated with indapamide therapy may occur with a recommended dose of 2.5 mg, which does not have a significant diuretic effect. Indapamide appears to be useful for treating central diabetes insipidus, raising the possibility that hyponatraemia occurs because of an inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion syndrome.6 Indapamide-related hyponatraemia may be more common in elderly women,1 as is the case for hyponatraemia associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Hyponatraemia associated with indapamide therapy appears to be sporadic and uncommon and may be avoided by appropriate monitoring of serum electrolyte levels.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW.
Laurence G Howes, MB BS, PhD, FRACP, Professor of Clinical Pharmacology.Correspondence: Professor Laurence G Howes, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St George Hospital, Gray Street, Kogarah, NSW 2217. l.howesATunsw.edu.au
In reply: Howes writes that previous studies have not shown significant hyponatraemia with indapamide. Our article highlighted that hyponatraemia was reported in a much larger proportion of all types of adverse drug reactions to indapamide than to chlorothiazide in Australia. As we clearly acknowledged, "Voluntary reporting systems do not provide a basis for calculating incidence or robust risk estimates".
In the PROGRESS study, 1770, and not 3000, participants were exposed to 2–2.5 mg of indapamide.1 The mean age of participants given active therapy in that study was 64 years and 30% were women. Details of the eight patients withdrawn because of hyponatraemia were not published.
Importantly for indapamide, chlorothiazide and the other comparator (hydrochlorothiazide with amiloride), more than 80% of the patients with hyponatraemia in our study of Australian adverse reaction reports were aged 65 years or older (mean age for indapamide, 69.3 years, unpublished data), and at least 78% were female. Given that indapamide formulations have been promoted as a replacement for chlorothiazide notwithstanding the acknowledged limitations of the data, our article was appropriate in alerting practitioners to the possibility of hyponatraemia, particularly in elderly women.
(Received 7 May 2002, accepted 9 May 2002)
Adverse Drug Reactions Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration, Woden, ACT.
John McEwen, MB BS, MSc, MPS, Director.The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW.
John E Marley, MD, MB ChB, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Health).Correspondence: Dr John McEwen, Adverse Drug Reactions Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration, PO Box 100, Woden, ACT 2606. john.mcewenAThealth.gov.au
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2002 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377