eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Letters

Thrombophilia screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with uteroplacental insufficiency

David Morgans
MJA2002; 176 (12): 617

To the Editor: The recent article by the Obstetric Medicine Group of Australasia alluded to the increasing relevance and importance of thrombophilia screening following adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely recurrent miscarriage, stillbirth, retarded intrauterine growth and pre-eclampsia.1 Formerly, these outcomes were generally attributed to "placental insufficiency", where a cause was not readily identified.

Screening for disorders in the uteroplacental circulation after such adverse pregnancy outcomes was formerly confined to investigations for an autoimmune basis, such as antinuclear antibodies, anticentromere antibodies, anti-DNA antibodies and the lupus inhibitor. However, in recent years, it has become more apparent that inherited or acquired thrombophilias may play a significant role in certain adverse pregnancy outcomes.2-5 Reports from Israel2,3 and elsewhere have suggested that thrombophilias can be found in up to 65% of women with recurrent pregnancy loss of unknown cause, as well as in cases of intrauterine growth retardation, stillbirth, placental abruption and pre-eclampsia. It is also known that certain thrombophilic factors are more likely to produce thrombogenic changes and hence are possible deficiencies in the uteroplacental circulation.

Preliminary work has shown that treating women who have had recurrent pregnancy loss complicated by thrombophilia with antithrombotic agents (low molecular weight heparins) is beneficial, with improved pregnancy outcomes in a significant number of these cases.3

With the growing understanding of the role of thrombophilias in pregnancy, it seems that thrombophilia screening will assume a more prominent role in investigating patients after recurrent miscarriage, stillbirth, intrauterine growth retardation and pre-eclampsia.

  1. Hague WM, North RA, Gallus AS, et al. Anticoagulation in pregnancy and the puerperium. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 258-263. <PubMed>
  2. Brenner B. Inherited thrombophilia and pregnancy loss. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82: 634-640. <PubMed>
  3. Brenner B, Hoffman R, Blumenfeld Z, et al. Gestational outcome in thrombophilic women with recurrent pregnancy loss treated by Enoxaparin. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 693-697. <PubMed>
  4. Preston FE, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, et al. Increased fetal loss in women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet 1996; 348: 913-916. <PubMed>
  5. Rai R, Regun L, Hadley E, et al. Second trimester pregnancy loss is associated with activated protein C resistance. Br J Haematol 1996; 92: 489-490. <PubMed>

(Received 18 Mar 2002, accepted 2 May 2002)

Caringbah, NSW.

David Morgans, BSc(Hons), MB BS, PhD, FRACOG, Obstetrician and Gynaecologist.

Correspondence: Dr David Morgans, 423 The Kingsway, Caringbah, NSW 2229.

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2002 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377