|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
Submitting items for publication
The MJA peer review process
The publication process
Categories of articles
Ethical approval and patient permission
Clinical trial registration
Supplements
Page charges
Checklist for submitting a manuscript to the MJA
To submit a manuscript, go to http://www.editorialmanager.com/mja/ |
Submit a book review by emailing it to the MJA Librarian, mjalibrary@ampco.com.au |
The Medical Journal of Australia aims to be the premier forum for information and commentary on clinical medicine and healthcare in Australia. To achieve this, the MJA publishes original clinical research, reviews and educational articles, together with commentary and informed debate on standards of clinical practice, and on social, ethical, legal and other issues related to healthcare. The Journal welcomes articles in all these categories.
→ Alternative methods of submission
→ Declarations: Competing interests and Acknowledgements
→ Style
→ Tables
Manuscripts submitted to the MJA must conform with the Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals.
Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to the Journal. This means that manuscripts should not be simultaneously submitted to other journals nor made available to others, including news reporters, while they are being considered for publication. This embargo continues up to the publication date for those manuscripts which are accepted.
The MJA uses the “Editorial Manager” system of online manuscript submission. Online submission is fast and allows authors to track the progress of their submissions through peer review and the editorial decision-making process.
First time users: Please select “Register” from the menu at the top of the Editorial Manager web page and enter the requested information. Upon successful registration, you will be sent an email containing your username and password. You need these to log in.
Registered users: Select “Login” from the menu at the top of the Editorial Manager web page and provide your username and password. Log in as “Author”. Then submit your manuscript and track its progress through the system.
For further information on the Editorial Manager system please download the Tutorial for Authors available at http://www.editorialmanager.com/mja/.
Note: Do not include author-identifying information in your manuscript. The manuscript you submit online will (if appropriate) be forwarded to peer reviewers. The MJA uses “blind” peer review, in which reviewers are not told the identity of the authors. To preserve blinding, your manuscript should not contain author-identifying information, such as a list of authors on the title page or a contact address. This information should be submitted online on the forms provided for this purpose.
Manuscripts should be Word documents (or a compatible word-processing format). Do not use headers and footers, automatic referencing or footnotes and keep the layout of the file as simple as possible. Number the pages, starting with the title page. Include word counts of the main text and the abstract.
Your covering letter should be submitted online with your manuscript. It can contain author-identifying information as it will not be shown to peer reviewers. It should include:
Alternative methods of submission: Authors who cannot access the Editorial Manager submission system can submit articles by email or by post (with a disk).
Email:
medjaust@ampco.com.au.
Submit a book review by emailing it to the MJA Librarian, mjalibrary@ampco.com.au
Post:
The Editor
The Medical Journal of Australia
Locked Bag 3030, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia.
Tel: +61 2 9562 6666.
Fax: +61 2 9562 6699.
For a posted submission, send one printed copy of the manuscript and a CD or disk with a copy in Word format.
Declarations: In separate documents to be submitted online with the manuscript, we require
Copyright: All authors are asked to transfer copyright to AMPCo before publication. Accepted manuscripts may not be published elsewhere, in whole or in part, without written permission from the Australasian Medical Publishing Company (AMPCo) Ltd.
Authorship: Authorship should be based on substantial contribution to (a) concept and design of the article, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; (b) drafting of the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) final approval of the version to be published. Conditions (a), (b) and (c) must all be met, and each author must be prepared to take public responsibility for the article. Authors may be asked to sign a declaration to this effect. Order of authors should be the joint decision of all authors.
Any change in authors and/or contributors (eg, additions, deletions or change of order) after initial manuscript submission must be approved by all authors. An explanation for the change must be submitted to the Journal, signed by all authors, including the added/moved/removed author(s).
Style: Use abbreviations sparingly (spell out at first use). Give all measurements in SI units (except blood pressure, which is in mmHg). Supply reference ranges where appropriate. Drugs should be referred to by their generic, not their proprietary, names.
Tip for accurate journal references
Typing errors often render references inaccurate. For accurate references to biomedical journals, check the reference in PubMed’s Single Citation Matcher and copy the PubMed citation into your document.
References: Accuracy of references is the responsibility of authors. Compile a reference list at the end of the text - do NOT submit references in endnote or footnote format. Use the "Vancouver style" and abbreviate journal names as in Index Medicus. Give surnames and initials of all authors (or only the first three authors [et al] if there are more than four) and cite first and last page numbers in full (these two requirements are slightly different from the Vancouver style). Specify the type of reference (eg, a letter, an editorial, an abstract, a supplement). Cite personal communications and unpublished papers in the text, not in the reference list and obtain written permission from people cited, giving their titles, positions and affiliations. For all non-journal references, including conference publications, newspaper articles and electronic media, please consult the National Library of Medicine's "Citing Medicine" at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=citmed.TOC&depth=2 for the required detail and format.
Tables: Present all tables in double-spaced type on separate pages; simplify the information as much as possible, keeping the number of columns to a minimum and the headings short. Information in tables should not be duplicated in the text.
Figures and illustrations: Should be submitted in electronic format, provided that high quality electronic images are available:
If unable to provide electronic images, or if uncertain about the quality of the images you can provide, please provide printed copies by post. If providing prints:
→ Revision
The peer review process is managed online. Authors can log in to Editorial Manager at any time to check the status of their submission. Decisions are communicated by email to the corresponding author. (Authors without email are contacted by phone, fax or post.)
Acknowledgement: Submitted manuscripts are acknowledged by email.
Editorial committee: All manuscripts are initially reviewed by the MJA's in-house editorial committee and those deemed unsuitable (insufficient originality, serious scientific or methodological flaws, or a message that is too specialised or of limited interest to a general medical audience) are returned to the author(s), usually within 4 weeks.
Peer review: Manuscripts are sent, blinded, to two or three experts (from our panel of over 3000). After reassessment by the editorial committee they are returned to the authors, either for revision or because they are unsuitable for publication, about 8 to 10 weeks after the date of submission.
Revision: A request for revision does not mean that the manuscript has been accepted for publication, but is an opportunity to present the best possible article to the editorial committee for a decision about publication. Authors are generally given 4 to 6 weeks to return the revised manuscript to us.
Copyright: Authors are usually asked to transfer copyright to AMPCo at the revision stage. Accepted manuscripts may not be published elsewhere, in whole or in part, without written permission from the Australasian Medical Publishing Company (AMPCo) Ltd.
Click here for a copy of our copyright form in Word document format.
Revisions should be prepared using Word's "Track changes" feature, and should be sent together with a letter outlining the responses to the reviewers' comments.
How to use Track Changes in Word:
Acceptance/rejection: The final decision about publication is made by the Editor.
Editing: All accepted manuscripts are edited for brevity and clarity (for some articles editing may be extensive) and authors receive a galley proof of the edited manuscript (by email, or by facsimile if email is not available) for checking of factual accuracy. This should be given urgent attention. No further major corrections are usually possible once the galley proof has been returned to us.
Publication: Authors are notified of the publication date of their article.
Embargo: All accepted manuscripts are subject to embargo until noon on the day before publication. Manuscripts should not be made available to others, nor should any news reports about articles appear until the date of publication.
Press releases: Press releases about each issue of the MJA are issued by the Federal office of the Australian Medical Association. The authors of any article selected for press release will receive a copy of the release for approval in the fortnight before publication.
Reprints: Reprints (black and white or colour) may be ordered for all articles. Prices are supplied with the author's proof or on request.
The table below summarises the requirements for the various categories of MJA articles.
Abbreviations used:
SA = structured abstract (See Haines RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 69-76. Note different structures for original research and reviews). Also see our Abstracts page
UA = unstructured abstract.
DPA = dot point abstract.
|
Type of article |
Limits |
Description |
Additional considerations |
|
|
850 words 10 ref no abstract |
Authoritative commentary on topics of current interest or MJA articles |
Usually commissioned. Unsolicited editorials should be discussed with the editor first |
||
|
(these may be subdivided by editor into Healthcare, Medicine and the community) |
2500 words 25 ref SA 250 words |
Original research relevant to clinical medicine (not animal or laboratory work) |
Use IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion). RCTs must follow CONSORT guidelines (including checklist and flowchart, see www.consort-statement.org). RCTs must be registered in a public trials registry (see below)." Specify date(s) of study. If a questionnaire was used, include a copy. |
|
|
2500 words 50 ref SA 250 words |
Critical analysis of topic of current clinical interest |
Systematic reviews preferred, include details of data sources, inclusion criteria, and data extraction and synthesis. Comprehensive narrative reviews are also welcomed. Use structured abstract specific for reviews. Meta-analyses of RCTs must follow the QUORUM guidelines including the checklist and flow chart, see http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/ |
||
|
1500 words 15 ref UA 100 words |
Unique case, not previously reported |
Clinical/diagnostic photos encouraged |
||
|
1000 words 10 ref UA 100 words |
Case report which is not novel but has important clinical message |
Clinical/diagnostic photos encouraged. Include box of about four points summarising lesson(s) |
||
|
1000 words 10 ref UA 100 words |
Case report which is not novel but has important clinical message about difficult diagnostic pathway |
Clinical/diagnostic photos encouraged |
||
|
1500 words 10 ref UA 100 words |
Any issues related to healthcare/ethics/law as applicable to medicine |
|||
|
2500 words 50 ref DPA 250 words |
Recommendations from learned bodies or interest groups |
Describe consensus process and evidence base; include levels of evidence |
||
|
1500 words 25 ref DPA 250 words |
Discussion of controversial topic |
May be single longer article discussing controversial issue, or two shorter articles by authors with opposing views (the latter is usually commissioned) |
||
|
2000 words 25 ref DPA 250 words |
The interface between law and medicine |
|||
|
2000 words 25 ref DPA 250 words |
Discussion of ethical issues related to patient care (ie, should have a clinical focus) |
Case scenarios may be helpful to illustrate issues |
||
|
1500 words No abstract |
Overview of the highlights of a recent medical conference |
Conferences with presentations relevant to a wide general audience preferred |
||
|
1500 words 25 ref UA 100 words |
Essay on topic of historical medical interest |
Relevance to medicine in Australia preferred |
||
|
1500 words 25 ref DPA 250 words |
Potential clinical application of new research or technology |
|||
|
1500 words No abstract |
Personal experiences in the practice of medicine – may be critical, instructive or humorous |
|||
|
100 words |
Interesting or amusing clinical photo |
Brief caption or relevant case details required to explain context of photo |
||
|
400 words 5 ref |
Brief research reports, comments on topics of current clinical interest or correspondence about MJA articles |
Should have no more than 4 authors Comments should be made about MJA articles within 3 months of the article’s publication |
||
|
350 words |
Brief overview of a medical person’s life and works |
Please supply photo — does not need to be recent Give birth and death dates, place of birth, names and cities of the major institutions in which people trained and worked, where and when they obtained each qualification, positions of importance, other interests outside medicine and cause of death |
||
|
300 words |
Reviews of newly published books or multimedia |
Usually commissioned; unsolicited reviews must be discussed with the editor first Should tell readers something new or interesting about the subject. Most are published on the web (eMJA Bookroom); some are also published in print. Submit book reviews by emailing them to the MJA Librarian, mjalibrary@ampco.com.au |
||
|
2500 words 50 ref DPA 250 words |
Evidence-based, state-of-the-art review of recent advances in pharmacotherapy for clinically relevant conditions |
Usually commissioned; include levels of evidence, Box of important messages for patients, and Box summarising drug profile (eg action, dose and administration, adverse effects, interactions and contraindications) |
||
|
2500 words 25 ref DPA 250 words |
Review of recent advances in diagnosis and/or management of a clinically relevant problem, with a practical focus |
Clinical/diagnostic photos encouraged |
||
See the Checklist for submitting a manuscript to the MJA
All experimental investigations on human subjects must include a statement in the Methods section that the subjects gave their informed consent. The name of the ethics committee that gave approval for the study must be stated in the Methods section. Ethical approval may also be required for case reports. Patient anonymity must be preserved, and identifying information should not be published unless it is essential for scientific purposes. If identifying information is essential, authors must provide a signed statement from the patient(s) giving approval for the publication of the identifying material, including photographs.
Studies involving Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander subjects must also state that they have been approved by the relevant local Indigenous representatives.
The MJA supports the registration of trials as an important initiative to improve the reporting of clinical studies (see http://www.mja.com.au/public/issues/183_01_040705/van10440_fm.html.) Clinical trials that begin enrolment of patients after 1 July 2005 must register in a public trials registry at or before the onset of enrolment to be considered for publication. If you are submitting a randomised controlled trial please add the registration number of the trial and the name of the trial registry in the acknowledgements section of your manuscript. The Australian Clinical Trial Registry is located at the National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre at the University of Sydney (http://www.actr.org.au). Other trial registers that currently meet all of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and World Health Organization (WHO) requirements can be found at http://www.icmje.org/faq.pdf.
Collections of papers on the same topic may be published as supplements, usually funded by sources other than the Journal. They are subject to the Journal's usual editorial and peer-review processes. Contact the Editor if you wish to propose a supplement.
MJA policy on sponsored supplements
The first four pages of an article will be published free of charge. Four Journal pages accommodate about 3000 words of plain text, or 2700 words and an average table, or 2300 words and two tables etc. Articles which cannot be shortened will be subject to charges for pages in excess of four. The fee for one excess page is $1000; for two, $2000; for three, $3500; for four, $5000; for more than four, negotiable (GST to be added). The fee (or part thereof) may be waived at the Editor's discretion.
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
<URL:http://www.mja.com.au/public/information/instruc.html> © 2005 Medical Journal of Australia.