HERE have been relatively few trials investigating the efficacy of
possible treatments or preventive interventions for osteoporosis
and osteoporotic fractures, and most of the existing studies have had
small numbers of subjects. Large studies are required before clear
recommendations about the prevention and management of
osteoporosis, and comparisons between treatments, can be made.
There are several levels at which research into osteoporosis should
be carried out in Australia, with a focus on groups that have expertise
in the areas of osteoporosis, bone biology, epidemiology,
rehabilitation or large scale trials. Much of the basic research can
and should be supported through expansion of existing peer reviewed
funding. However, there is room for targeted interactions between
basic scientific research and industry.
Research issues identified as being crucial to better and more
cost-effective prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
include:
Defining the magnitude of the problem
- Better understanding of the epidemiology of osteoporosis in
general and in various ethnic groups in particular.
- Better understanding of costs, morbidity and mortality in non-hip
fractures.
Pathophysiology
- Basic bone biology, including identification of effective bone
anabolic agents and understanding of genetic mechanisms.
Detection
- More efficient and cost-effective identification of individuals
at high risk before fracture.
- New methods to measure bone fragility, to supplement or replace the
measurement of density.
- Analysis of the role of genetic markers in diagnosis and selection of
therapy.
A major focus in clinical application is the targeting of
interventions to those at greatest risk and those most likely to
respond to particular therapies. The roles of ultrasound, bone
turnover markers, genetic factors and other clinical and
biochemical indices need to be evaluated, to assess whether they
assist in the selection of optimal therapy and could improve
cost-effectiveness.
Prevention
-
Clarification of factors in attainment of peak bone mass, including
genetic and lifestyle factors.
- Clarification of the role and costs of lifestyle changes in
preventing bone loss.
- Identification of the components of fall prevention programs which
contribute most to reducing falls and fractures.
The role of genetics and lifestyle factors in attainment of peak bone
mass, including their action in prepubertal children, needs to be
addressed. The relative effects of genetics and lifestyle factors
may vary at different points during life. Some studies indicate that
the effects of exercise or calcium are greater before than during
adolescence. However, these studies have not followed children
through to adulthood to determine whether peak bone mass is actually
altered. Clarification of these points would allow recommendations
about whether osteoporosis-related health promotion activities
should be directed towards children or adolescents. Evaluation
should be built in to all such health promotion programs.
Community-based intervention studies are needed to determine the
uptake of messages about lifestyle changes and whether these lead to
changes in important indicators of osteoporosis in the population.
Treatment
- Large scale comparative studies, including studies of combination
therapies.
- Investigation of whether targeting therapies to those most likely
to benefit from them is useful.
- Better understanding of optimal treatment (and prevention) of
osteoporosis in men.
There is a major need for the definition and testing of "anabolic"
therapies that will restore bone to a younger, healthier condition.
Such agents are currently being investigated around the world and
Australian osteoporosis scientists should be part of this effort.
There is also a clear need for direct testing of possible drug
combinations, when positive or negative interaction cannot be
predicted reliably from current data. These should be in large scale,
long-term controlled studies. There is room for partnerships
between clinical science, pharmaceutical companies and government
health bodies for the exploration of comparative drug studies, with
appropriate evaluation of non-drug interventions as well.
Identification of those most likely to benefit from any
pharmaceutical or lifestyle intervention is a critical issue.
It is vital that the Australian community, including the public,
health professionals, public health authorities and governments,
recognise the scope and magnitude of the osteoporosis problem, both
in human and economic terms. With this recognition, research can be
targeted towards the prevention and optimal management of
osteoporosis and associated fractures.
Next: List of references
Or: Contact for printed copies