EBM — a moral imperative | |
Ethics and evidence-based medicine. Fallibility and responsibility in clinical science. Kenneth W Goodman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 (xii + 168 pp). ISBN 0 521 79653 9. |
Goodman explores the links
between scientific knowledge, clinical practice and ethics in this well-written and enthusiastic book. The main argument of the book is that practitioners are constantly faced with clinical decisions characterised by uncertainty — decisions with serious implications for patients. This uncertainty about the right course of action can be reduced through the use of evidence, making it morally blameworthy not to use evidence. For Goodman, an uninformed practitioner is a negligent practitioner, whose patients are “no longer seeing a physician, but visiting a museum”.
A series of well-informed chapters engage with some of the major criticisms of evidence-based medicine (EBM). Issues such as flawed research, redundant publishing, publication bias, and the shortcomings of research synthesis are tackled squarely. Despite these problems, argues Goodman, the use of research is well founded both conceptually and practically, creating the imperative to improve the quality of research production and synthesis rather than abandon EBM. The only weakness in his reasoning is the lack of evidence that using EBM leads to better patient outcomes, or discussion of how this might be demonstrated. The author’s expertise in philosophy and computing are evident in the discussion of ethical issues raised by internet use in research, for data collection and for recruiting. As well as a chapter on clinical EBM and guidelines, the relationship between policy and evidence is explored through three case studies, providing concrete examples of the promises and problems of evidence-based public health. Overall, this is a thoughtful and sympathetic exploration of the moral imperative to use EBM. The detailed analyses are supplemented with practical suggestions, making the book of interest to academics and practitioners alike. This is a valuable early contribution on the ethics of EBM; no doubt further contributions will engage with some of the wider ethical issues that were beyond the scope of this text. Wendy A Rogers
|