|
Home
|
Issues
|
MJA shop
|
MJA Careers
|
Contact
|
Topics
|
Search
|
RSS |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on Emergency medicine
→ More articles on Administration and health services
→ Search PubMed for related articles
Click to Login
Hide the Login Box
→ Click here for subscription options
To the Editor: Cameron and colleagues are to be congratulated on their article outlining strategies that do and do not help improve the access of emergency medical patients to public hospital ward beds.1 The authors fail to mention one strategy that is particularly relevant to rural hospitals, namely, referring privately insured medical patients who present to emergency departments directly to tertiary medical services at private hospitals. This strategy has the dual benefit of providing a hospital bed for a patient in a rural emergency department who requires hospital admission, and relieving some of the external pressures on metropolitan tertiary referral public hospitals to provide beds.
Traditionally, private health insurance has been thought of as providing patients with the ability to obtain treatment from the doctor and hospital of their choice. Increasingly, private health insurance is giving patients the ability to choose between staying on an emergency department trolley and being able to access a hospital bed in a timely manner. It is worth noting that privately insured patients who require services that are not provided at our hospital (such as interventional cardiology, neurosurgery, cardiothoracic surgery and faciomaxillary surgery) can sometimes access a bed in a private hospital about 500 km away sooner than we can find them a bed in our hospital prior to transfer to a tertiary public hospital.
A significant impediment to this process for some privately insured patients is the inability of private hospitals to perform insurance fund checks out-of-hours. While most private health insurance funds provide internet authorisations and confirmations of a patient’s insurance status to private hospitals, some do not. In one case, this meant the wife of a patient with unstable angina pectoris had to provide a cash guarantee of $28 000 on a Sunday so that her husband could have an angiogram the next day. Even though they had “top-level” private health insurance cover, the private hospital could not confirm their insurance status and obtain an authorisation from their health insurance fund on a weekend.
Patients with private health insurance should be able to use the benefits of their insurance 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Private health insurance funds that do not provide 24-hour authorisations to private hospitals for hospital admission should state this limitation clearly in their insurance product as a part of their statutory product disclosure statements. Such disclosure would provide relevant information to consumers to enable them to make an informed choice about their private health insurer.
|
Home
|
Issues
|
MJA shop
| Terms of use
|
MJA Careers
|
More...
|
Contact
|
Topics
|
Search
|
RSS |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2009 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377