|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search | Login | Buy full access |
→ Contents list for this issue
→ More articles on General practice and primary care
→ More articles on Administration and health services
A few short years ago, the death of general practice as we knew it was reported.1 However, as suggested by our cover image of the mythical phoenix (Box), with its reference to Ovid’s poem Metamorphoses — “what is called birth is change from what we were, and death the shape of being left behind” — there is another explanation. This perceived “death” may, in fact, have been the preface to a significant cycle of change now manifesting in general practice in many countries around the world, including Australia.
These changes, reflected in the articles in this general practice theme issue of the Journal, are many. They include already evolving pandemics of chronic illnesses, including cancer (see Weller and Harris, "Cancer care: what role for the general practitioner?"; Jiwa et al, "Timely cancer diagnosis and management as a chronic condition: opportunities for primary care"), accompanied by the increasing realisation that patients with chronic illness often have multiple morbidities (see Knox et al, "Estimating prevalence of common chronic morbidities in Australia"; Britt et al, "Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in Australia"). Parallel with changes in the epidemiology of disease, there have also been changes in health care policy and funding, including a wide array of systems for remunerating practices for their services, all of which need to be acknowledged and some of which could do with a degree of rethinking (see Ashworth and Jones, "Pay for performance systems in general practice: experience in the United Kingdom"; Kirby et al, "Sharing or shuffling — realities of chronic disease care in general practice").
Much discussion and debate about the possibilities for further change have followed the election of the Rudd federal Labor government, particularly the proposed introduction of GP Super Clinics2 (see Kidd, "What impact will the change of federal government have on Australian general practice?"). The announcement that a National Primary Health Care Strategy is to be developed, with strong general practice input into the committee formed to steer the process, is a welcome indication of government interest.3 On the other hand, recent budget cuts to general practice programs such as after-hours services and e-health, and changes to the immunisation incentives program, send a contradictory message.4
Undoubtedly, major challenges surround the issues of general practice workforce and changing roles for general practitioners in clinical practice (see Thistlethwaite et al, Addressing general practice workforce shortages: policy options; Willcock, "Getting back into the emergency department: diversifying general practice while relieving emergency medicine workforce shortages"). Interesting and challenging questions are being asked about what sort of clinician might be best equipped to provide health care for patients with several complex, chronic illnesses. In a world of increasing specialisation and subspecialisation, including within general practice, it is paradoxical that the role of the generalist will become more important in providing comprehensive, coordinated and accessible care for all (see Gunn et al, "The promise and pitfalls of generalism in achieving the Alma-Ata vision of health for all"). This same need underpinned an earlier rebirth of general practice in the 1950s.5
Though much has changed in the world and in general practice, some constancies remain. As highlighted by Professor Trisha Greenhalgh in her keynote address at this year’s General Practice and Primary Health Care Research Conference in Hobart (http://www.phcris.org.au/conference/browse.php?confID=758), people in the community continue to want a knowledgeable, skilled and altruistic family doctor who understands evidence, but who also knows how to apply it with understanding and humanity. We believe this to be an apt description of a typical Australian GP.
The phoenix — “and all things change”
1 The Medical Journal of Australia, Sydney, NSW.
2 School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW.
Correspondence: medjaustATampco.com.au
|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | Terms of use | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search |
©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377