eMJA     The Medical Journal of Australia

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search   

Editorials

In the long run, skills are as good as pills for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Joseph M Rey
MJA 2008; 188 (3): 133-134

The need for stimulant treatment must be assessed regularly

In a United States legal action in 2000 about educational neglect, Albany County judge G E Maney ordered the parents to resume administering methylphenidate to 7-year-old Kyle Carroll.1 At the time, this controversial ruling was understandable, because controlled trials of stimulant treatment (dexamphetamine and methylphenidate) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) had consistently shown that stimulants reduce ADHD symptoms. The catch is that trials have examined short-term effectiveness (usually over less than 6 months), while ADHD is a chronic condition.

Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | More... | Contact | Topics | Search

The Medical Journal of Australia    eMJA  

©The Medical Journal of Australia 2008 www.mja.com.au PRINT ISSN: 0025-729X ONLINE ISSN: 1326-5377