|
Home | Issues | eMJA shop | My account | Classifieds | Contact | More... | Topics | Search |
→More articles on Respiratory medicine
→Download a pdf version of this article
These guidelines have been developed by the
Australian Lung Foundation
and the
Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand
as part of a national COPD program.


The Australian Lung Foundation gratefully acknowledges the following sponsors
who provide unconditional educational grants to fund the program.



Supplement — clinical guidelines
The COPDX Plan: Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2003
Note: A revised version of these guidelines is available at http://www.copdx.org.au/guidelines/index.asp
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of disability, hospital admission and premature death. More than half a million Australians are estimated to have moderate to severe disease,1 and, as the population ages, the burden of COPD is likely to increase. In Australia, only heart disease and stroke contribute more to the overall burden of disease,2 while, in New Zealand, COPD is second only to stroke. COPD ranks fourth among the common causes of death in Australian men and sixth in women. In New Zealand, it ranks third in men and fourth in women.3
Smoking is the most important risk factor for COPD. Further, smoking-related diseases are increasing substantially in women, and death rates from COPD in women are expected to overtake those in men. The death rate from COPD among Indigenous Australians is five times that for non-Indigenous Australians, and smoking is a leading cause of healthy years lost by indigenous people both in Australia and New Zealand.
COPD costs the Australian community an estimated $818–$898 million annually.4 This is a conservative estimate, based on 1993–1994 figures extrapolated to the year 2001. The addition of hidden costs, such as those related to carer burden, loss of productivity from absenteeism and early retirement, could increase the estimate to more than $1 billion per annum.
Because it is considered incurable, self-inflicted and relatively resistant to treatment, a sense of nihilism about COPD prevails. However, much can be done to improve quality of life, increase exercise capacity, and reduce morbidity and mortality in affected individuals.
This guideline was developed according to the principles of the National Health and Medical Research Council,5 but differs from previous guidelines on COPD in that it draws from the recently published international Guideline for the Management of Obstructive Lung Disease6 as the primary evidence base. These Australian and New Zealand guidelines have a strong emphasis on the use of objective measures of function, the role of non-pharmacological interventions and promotion of self-management. The key recommendations are summarised in the "COPDX Plan": Confirm diagnosis, Optimise function, Prevent deterioration, Develop a self-management plan and manage eXacerbations.
These guidelines are the outcome of a joint project of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the Australian Lung Foundation. The guidelines aim to:
effect changes in clinical practice based on sound evidence; and
shift the emphasis from a predominant reliance on pharmacological treatment of COPD to a range of interventions which include patient education, self-management of exacerbations and pulmonary rehabilitation.
These guidelines deal mainly with the management of established disease and exacerbations. However, this is only one element of the COPD Strategy of the Australian Lung Foundation, which has the long-term goals of:
primary prevention of smoking;
improving rates of smoking cessation;
early detection of airflow limitation in smokers before disablement; and
improved management of stable disease and prevention of exacerbations.
In May 2001 a multidisciplinary steering committee was convened by the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) and the Australian Lung Foundation in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council recommendations for guideline development.5 The Committee agreed to use the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop Report6 as the prime evidence base, together with systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database. The GOLD Report, released in April 2001, was produced by an international panel of experts in collaboration with the United States National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The levels of evidence in the current guidelines were assigned according to the system developed by the NHLBI (Box 1).
The Guidelines Steering Committee supervised the development of specific items such as the COPDX Plan and a management handbook for primary care clinicians. Drafts of these documents were widely circulated to key stakeholder groups and professional organisations. In addition, the draft guidelines were published on the Internet (http://www.lungnet.com.au/copd.html), and access to them was advertised in a national newspaper. The draft guidelines were circulated to all members of the TSANZ and Australian Divisions of General Practice. All comments received were reviewed by the Steering Committee.
Logistical and financial support for the development of these guidelines was provided by the Australian Lung Foundation as part of its COPD program. This program is funded by grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Pty Ltd (North Ryde, NSW), GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd (Boronia, VIC), Air Liquide Healthcare Pty Ltd (Annandale, NSW) and BOC Medical (BOC Gases Australia Limited, North Ryde, NSW).
The key recommendations and levels of evidence incorporated in the COPDX guidelines are based largely on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), which used the evidence ranking system of the US National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI).6 The NHLBI scheme is shown in Box 1. For comparison, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)5 levels of evidence are also shown, along with the equivalent NHLBI categories.
1: Levels of evidence
a) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) categories
NHLBI category |
Sources of evidence |
Definition |
|||||||||
A |
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) — extensive body of data |
Evidence is from endpoints of well-designed RCTs that provide a consistent pattern of findings in the population for which the recommendation is made. Category A requires substantial numbers of studies involving substantial numbers of participants. |
|||||||||
B |
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) — limited body of data |
Evidence is from endpoints of intervention studies that include only a limited number of patients, post-hoc or subgroup analysis of RCTs, or meta-analysis of RCTs. In general, category B pertains when few randomised trials exist, they are small in size, they were undertaken in a population that differs from the target population of the recommendation, or the results are somewhat inconsistent. |
|||||||||
C |
Non-randomised trials, observational studies |
Evidence is from outcomes of uncontrolled or non-randomised trials or from observational studies. |
|||||||||
D |
Panel consensus, judgement |
The panel consensus is based on clinical experience or knowledge that does not meet the above criteria. |
|||||||||
b) National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) levels of evidence and corresponding National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute categories
NHLBI category |
NHMRC level |
Basis of evidence |
|||||||||
A |
I |
Evidence obtained from a systematic review of all relevant randomised controlled trials. |
|||||||||
B |
II |
Evidence obtained from at least one properly designed randomised controlled trial. |
|||||||||
C |
III-1 |
Evidence obtained from well-designed pseudorandomised controlled trials (alternate allocation or some other method). |
|||||||||
C |
III-2 |
Evidence obtained from comparative studies (including systematic reviews of such studies) with concurrent controls and allocation not randomised, cohort studies, case-control studies, or interrupted time series with a control group. |
|||||||||
C |
III-3 |
Evidence obtained from comparative studies with historical control, two or more single-arm studies, or interrupted time series without a parallel group. |
|||||||||
C |
IV |
Evidence obtained from case series, either post-test or pre-test/post-test. |
|||||||||
Summary of the COPDX guidelines
C: Confirm diagnosis and assess severity |
Evidence level |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
D |
||||||||||
O: Optimise function |
|
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
C |
||||||||||
P: Prevent deterioration |
|
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
D: Develop support network and self-management plan |
|
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
C |
||||||||||
|
C |
||||||||||
|
C |
||||||||||
X: Manage eXacerbations |
|
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
A |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
B |
||||||||||
|
C |
||||||||||
|
C |
||||||||||
|
C |
||||||||||
Aetiology and natural history
—Diagnosis
—History
—Physical examination
—Spirometry
—Flow volume tests
—Assessing the severity of COPD
—Assessing acute response to bronchodilators
—Confirm or exclude asthma
—Specialist referral
—Complex lung function tests
—Exercise testing
—Sleep studies
—Chest x-rays
—High resolution computed tomography
—Ventilation and perfusion scans
—Transcutaneous oxygen saturation
—Arterial blood gas measurement
—Sputum examination
—Haematology and biochemistry
—Electrocardiography and echocardiography
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by airway inflammation and airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. It is a progressive, disabling disease with serious complications and exacerbations that are major burdens for healthcare systems.
Small-airway narrowing (with or without chronic bronchitis) and emphysema caused by smoking are the common conditions resulting in COPD. Chronic bronchitis is daily sputum production for at least three months of two or more consecutive years. Emphysema is a pathological diagnosis, and consists of alveolar dilatation and destruction. Breathlessness with exertion, chest tightness and wheeze are the results of airway narrowing and impaired gas exchange. The loss of lung elastic tissue in emphysema may result in airway wall collapse during expiration, leading to dynamic hyperinflation and consequent increased work of breathing.
The irreversible component of airflow limitation is the end result of inflammation, fibrosis and remodelling of peripheral airways. Airflow limitation leads to non-homogeneous ventilation, while alveolar wall destruction and changes in pulmonary vessels reduce the surface area available for gas exchange. In advanced COPD there is a severe mismatching of ventilation and perfusion leading to hypoxaemia. Hypercapnia is a late manifestation and is caused by a reduction in ventilatory drive. Pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale are also late manifestations, and reflect pulmonary vasoconstriction due to hypoxia in poorly ventilated lung, vasoconstrictor peptides produced by inflammatory cells and vascular remodelling.6 The clinical features and pathophysiology of COPD can overlap with asthma, as most COPD patients have some reversibility of airflow limitation with bronchodilators. By contrast, some non-smokers with chronic asthma develop irreversible airway narrowing. The overlap between chronic bronchitis, emphysema and asthma and their relationship to airflow obstruction and COPD are illustrated in Box 2. Patients with chronic bronchiolitis, bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis may also present with similar symptoms and partially reversible airflow limitation.
2: Overlap of bronchitis, emphysema and asthma within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

This non-proportional Venn diagram shows the overlap of chronic bronchitis, emphysema and asthma within COPD. Chronic bronchitis, airway narrowing and emphysema are independent effects of cigarette smoking, and may occur in various combinations. Asthma is, by definition, associated with reversible airflow obstruction. Patients with asthma whose airflow obstruction is completely reversible do not have COPD. In many cases it is impossible to differentiate patients with asthma whose airflow obstruction does not remit completely from persons with chronic bronchitis and emphysema who have partially reversible airflow obstruction with airway hyperreactivity.
Cigarette smoking is the most important cause of COPD.7,8 There is a close relationship between the amount of tobacco smoked and the rate of decline in forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1 ), although individuals vary greatly in susceptibility.7 Around half of all smokers develop some airflow limitation, and 15%–20% will develop clinically significant disability.7 Smokers are also at risk of developing lung cancer, and cardiovascular disease such as ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease.
In susceptible smokers cigarette smoking results in a steady decline in lung function, with a decrease in FEV1 of 25–100 mL/year.7 While smoking cessation may lead to minimal improvements in lung function, more importantly it will slow the rate of decline in lung function and delay the onset of disablement. At all times smoking cessation is important to preserve remaining lung function.7
Impairment increases as the disease progresses, but may not be recognised because of the slow pace of the disease. The time course of development of COPD and disability and the influence of smoking cessation are illustrated in Box 3.
Other factors that can contribute to the development of COPD9 include:
occupational dust and fume exposure;
outdoor and indoor air pollution (including environmental tobacco smoke);
α1-antitrypsin deficiency;
genetic predisposition;
recurrent respiratory infections in childhood; and
bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
The single best predictor of mortality in COPD is FEV1 .7,10 In one study the five-year survival rate was only about 10% for those with an FEV1 < 20% predicted, 30% for those with FEV1 of 20%–29% predicted and about 50% for those with an FEV1 of 30%–39% predicted.10 Continued smoking and airway hyperresponsiveness are associated with accelerated loss of lung function.11 However, even if substantial airflow limitation is present, cessation of smoking may result in some improvement in lung function and will slow progression of disease.
The development of hypoxaemic respiratory failure is an independent predictor of mortality, with a three-year survival of about 40%.12 Long term administration of oxygen increases survival to about 50% with nocturnal oxygen12 and to about 60% with oxygen administration for more than 15 hours a day13 (see also section P, page S21).
Admission to hospital with an infective exacerbation of COPD complicated by hypercapnic respiratory failure is associated with a poor prognosis. A mortality of 11% during admission and 49% at two years has been reported in patients with a partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco2 ) > 50 mmHg.14 For those with chronic carbon dioxide retention (about 25% of those admitted with hypercapnic exacerbations), the five-year survival was only 11%.14
3: Time-course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)7

The figure (adapted from Fletcher and Peto7) shows the rate of loss of forced expiratory flow in one second (FEV1 ) for a hypothetical, susceptible smoker, and the potential effect of stopping smoking early or late in the course of COPD. Other susceptible smokers will have different rates of loss, thus reaching "disability" at different ages. The normal FEV1 ranges from below 80% to above 120%, so this will affect the starting point for the individual's data (not shown).
Consider COPD in all smokers and ex-smokers over the age of 35 years 7 [evidence level B]
The main symptoms of COPD are breathlessness, cough and sputum production.15 Patients often attribute breathlessness to ageing or lack of fitness. A persistent cough, typically worse in the mornings with mucoid sputum, is common in smokers. Other symptoms such as chest tightness, wheezing and airway irritability are common.16 Acute exacerbations, usually infective, occur from time to time and may lead to a sharp deterioration in coping ability. Fatigue, poor appetite and weight loss are more common in advanced disease.
The functional limitation from breathlessness due to COPD can be quantified easily in clinical practice17 (see Box 4).
4: Medical Research Council grading of functional limitation due to dyspnoea17
Grade |
Symptom complex |
||||||||||
1 |
"I only get breathless with strenuous exercise". |
||||||||||
2 |
"I get short of breath when hurrying on the level or walking up a slight hill". |
||||||||||
3 |
"I walk slower than most people of the same age on the level because of breathlessness or have to stop for breath when walking at my own pace on the level". |
||||||||||
4 |
"I stop for breath after walking about 100 yards or after a few minutes on the level". |
||||||||||
5 |
"I am too breathless to leave the house" or "I am breathless when dressing". |
||||||||||
The sensitivity of physical examination for detecting mild to moderate COPD is poor.18 Wheezing is not an indicator of severity of disease and is often absent in stable, severe COPD. In more advanced disease, physical features commonly found are hyperinflation of the chest, reduced chest expansion, hyperresonance to percussion, soft breath sounds and a prolonged expiratory phase. Right heart failure may complicate severe disease.
During an acute exacerbation, tachypnoea, tachycardia, use of accessory muscles, tracheal tug and cyanosis are common.
The presence and severity of airflow limitation are impossible to determine by clinical signs.18 Objective measurements such as spirometry are strongly recommended. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) is not a sensitive measure of airway function in COPD patients, as it is effort dependent and has a wide range of normal values.19
The diagnosis of COPD rests on the demonstration of airflow limitation which is not fully reversible 20 [evidence level B]
Spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing, assessing and monitoring COPD (see Box 5). Most spirometers provide predicted ("normal") values obtained from healthy population studies, and derived from formulas based on height, age, sex and ethnicity.
Airflow limitation is non-reversible when, after administration of bronchodilator medication, the ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) is < 70% and the FEV1 is < 80% of the predicted value. The ratio of FEV1 to vital capacity (VC) is a sensitive indicator for mild COPD.
breathlessness that seems inappropriate;
chronic (daily for two months) or intermittent, unusual cough;
frequent or unusual sputum production;
relapsing acute infective bronchitis; and
risk factors such as exposure to tobacco smoke, occupational dusts and chemicals, and a strong family history of COPD.
5: Maximal expiratory flow-volume curves in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic asthma

The patient with COPD has reduced peak expiratory flow, and severely decreased flows at 25%, 50% and 75% of vital capacity compared with the normal range (vertical bars), and shows minimal response to bronchodilator (BD). By comparison, the patient with chronic asthma shows incomplete, but substantial, reversibility of expiratory flow limitation across the range of vital capacity. After BD the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1 ) was within the normal range (82% predicted). Absolute and per cent predicted values for FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) before and after BD are shown for each patient.
Electronic spirometers allow for the simultaneous measurement of flow and volume during maximal expiration. Reduced expiratory flows at mid and low lung volumes are the earliest indicators of airflow limitation in COPD and may be abnormal even when FEV1 is within the normal range (> 80%).
Spirometry is the most reproducible, standardised and objective way of measuring airflow limitation, and FEV1 is the variable most closely associated with prognosis.10 The grades of severity according to FEV1 and the likely symptoms and complications are shown in Box 6. However, it should be noted that patients with an FEV1 > 80% predicted, although within the normal range, may have airflow limitation (FEV1 /FVC ratio < 70%).
6: Classification of severity of chronic obstructive pumonary disease (COPD)6
|
COPD severity |
||||||||||
Factor |
Mild |
Moderate |
Severe |
||||||||
Spirometry findings — postbronchodilator FEV1 |
60%–80% predicted |
40%–59% predicted |
< 40% predicted |
||||||||
Functional assessment (activities of daily living) |
Few symptoms No effect on daily activities Breathless on moderate exertion |
Increasing dyspnoea Breathless on the flat Increasing limitation of daily activities |
Dyspnoea on minimal exertion Daily activities severely curtailed |
||||||||
Complications |
No |
Exclude complications; consider sleep apnoea if there is pulmonary hypertension |
Severe hypoxaemia
(Pao2
< 60 mmHg, or 8 kPa)
Hypercapnia
(Paco2
> 45 mmHg, or 6 kPa)
|
||||||||
FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second. Pao2 = partial pressure of oxygen, arterial. Paco2 = partial pressure of carbon dioxide, arterial. |
|||||||||||
The response to bronchodilators is determined to:
assign a level of severity of airflow obstruction (post-bronchodilator);
help confirm or exclude asthma; and
help decide role of bronchodilator therapy.
The details for this assessment are outlined in Box 7.
The change in FEV1 after an acute bronchodilator reversibility test indicates the degree of reversibility of airflow limitation. This is often expressed as a percentage of the baseline measurement (eg, 12% increase). An increase in FEV1 of more than 12% and 200 mL is greater than average day-to-day variability and is unlikely to occur by chance.21 However, this degree of reversibility is not diagnostic of asthma and is frequently seen in patients with COPD (eg, the FEV1 increases from 0.8 L to 1.0 L when the predicted value is, say, 3.5 L). The diagnosis of asthma relies on an appropriate history and complete, or at least substantial, reversibility of airflow limitation (see also below).
7: Assessment of acute response to inhaled β-agonist at diagnosis
Preparation
Patients should be clinically stable and free of respiratory infection.
Withhold inhaled short-acting bronchodilators in the previous six hours, long-acting β-agonists in the previous 12 hours, or sustained-release theophyllines in the previous 24 hours.
Spirometry
Measure baseline spirometry (pre-bronchodilator). An FEV1 < 80% predicted and FEV1 /FVC ratio < 0.70 shows airflow limitation.
Give the bronchodilator by metered dose inhaler (MDI) through a spacer device or by nebuliser.
Give short-acting β-agonist, at a dose selected to be high on the dose–response curve (eg, 200–400 μg salbutamol from MDI and spacer).
Repeat spirometry 15–30 minutes after bronchodilator is given and measure degree of reversibility.
FEV1 = forced expiratory flow in one second. FVC = forced vital capacity.
If airflow limitation is fully or substantially reversible, the patient should be treated as for asthma [evidence level D]
Asthma and COPD are usually easy to differentiate. Asthma usually runs a more variable course and dates back to a younger age. Atopy is more common and the smoking history is often relatively light (eg, less than 15 pack-years). Airflow limitation in asthma is substantially, if not completely, reversible, either spontaneously or in response to treatment. By contrast, COPD tends to be progressive, with a late onset of symptoms and a moderately heavy smoking history (usually > 15 pack-years) and the airflow obstruction is not completely reversible.
However, there are some patients in whom it is difficult to distinguish between asthma and COPD as the primary cause of their chronic airflow limitation. Long-standing or poorly controlled asthma can lead to chronic, irreversible airway narrowing even in non-smokers.
Confirmation of the diagnosis of COPD and differentiation from chronic asthma, other airway diseases or occupational exposures that may cause airway narrowing or hyper-responsiveness, or both, often requires specialised knowledge and investigations. Indications for which consultation with a respiratory medicine specialist is recommended are shown in Box 8.
8: Referral to respiratory medicine specialist
Circumstances possibly requiring specialist review |
Role of respiratory specialist |
||||||||||
1. Moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) |
Confirm diagnosis and optimise therapy. Cease inappropriate or ineffective therapies. Assess side effects. Determine need for nebulised therapy. Assess complications. |
||||||||||
2. Uncertain diagnosis (< 10 pack-year smoking history or < 40 years of age or rapid decline in FEV1 ) |
Confirm diagnosis and exclude other diagnoses (eg, asthma, bronchiolitis obliterans, pulmonary embolism, cancer, heart failure, pneumothorax, anaemia). Determine other aetiological factors. Determine if the patient is predisposed (eg, α1-antitrypsin deficiency). |
||||||||||
3. Recurrent infections, exacerbations |
Exclude other conditions (eg, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, immunological abnormality, aspiration). |
||||||||||
4. Symptoms out of proportion to lung function impairment |
Exclude complications of COPD or comorbidities (eg, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac disease). Consider sleep study. |
||||||||||
5. Cor pulmonale |
Confirm diagnosis and optimise treatment, including assessment for oxygen or other ventilatory support. |
||||||||||
6. Suspect chronic hypoxaemia |
Confirm chronic hypoxaemia or nocturnal hypoxaemia. Assess for ambulatory oxygen therapy. |
||||||||||
7. Bullous lung disease or severe emphysema |
Determine suitability for bullectomy or lung volume reduction surgery. |
||||||||||
8. Severe disability or respiratory failure |
Determine suitability for lung volume reduction surgery or lung transplantation or home ventilation. |
||||||||||
COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second. |
|||||||||||
Measurement of airways resistance, static lung volumes and diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide assists in the assessment of patients with more complex respiratory disorders.
Cardiopulmonary exercise tests may be useful to differentiate between breathlessness resulting from cardiac or respiratory disease, and may help to identify other causes of exercise limitation (eg, hyperventilation, musculoskeletal disorder).
Specialist referral is recommended for COPD patients suspected of having a coexistent sleep disorder or with hypercapnia or pulmonary hypertension in the absence of daytime hypoxaemia, right heart failure or polycythaemia. Overnight pulse oximetry may be indicated in patients receiving long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy to assess its efficacy.
A plain posteroanterior and lateral chest x-ray helps to exclude other conditions such as lung cancer. The chest x-ray is not sensitive in the diagnosis of COPD, and will not exclude a small carcinoma (< 1cm).
High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scanning gives precise images of the lung parenchyma and mediastinal structures. The presence of emphysema and the size and number of bullae can be determined. This is necessary if bullectomy or lung reduction surgery is being contemplated. HRCT is also appropriate for detecting bronchiectasis. Vertical reconstructions can provide a virtual bronchogram.
Spiral computed tomography (CT) scans with intravenous contrast should be used in other circumstances, such as for investigating and staging lung cancer.
CT pulmonary angiograms are useful for investigating possible pulmonary embolism, especially when the chest x-ray is abnormal.
The ventilation and perfusion (V/Q) scan may be difficult to interpret in COPD patients, because regional lung ventilation may be compromised leading to matched defects. If pulmonary emboli are suspected, a CT pulmonary angiogram may be more useful. Quantitative regional V/Q scans are helpful in assessing whether patients are suitable for lung resection and lung volume reduction surgery.
Oximeters have an accuracy of plus or minus 2%, which is satisfactory for routine clinical purposes. Oximetry does not provide any information about carbon dioxide status and is inaccurate in the presence of poor peripheral circulation (eg, cold extremities, cardiac failure).
Arterial blood gas analysis should be considered in all patients with severe disease, those being considered for domiciliary oxygen therapy (eg, whose FEV1 is < 40% predicted or < 1 L, whose oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry [Spo2 ] is < 92%), those with pulmonary hypertension, and those with breathlessness out of proportion to their clinical status). Respiratory failure is defined as a Pao2 < 60 mmHg (8 kPa) or Paco2 > 50 mmHg (6.7 kPa).
Routine sputum culture in clinically stable patients with COPD is unhelpful and unnecessary. Sputum culture is recommended when an infection is not responding to antibiotic therapy or when a resistant organism is suspected.
Polycythaemia should be confirmed as being secondary to COPD by blood gas measurement confirming the presence of hypoxaemia. The possibility of sleep apnoea or hypoventilation should be considered if polycythaemia is present, but the oxygen saturation is normal when the patient is awake. Hyperthyroidism and acidosis are associated with breathlessness. Hyperventilation states are associated with respiratory alkalosis. Hypothyroidism aggravates obstructive sleep apnoea.
Multifocal atrial tachycardia is a frequent finding. Atrial fibrillation commonly develops when pulmonary artery pressure rises, leading to increased right atrial pressure.
Echocardiography is useful if cor pulmonale is suspected, when breathlessness is out of proportion to the degree of respiratory impairment or when ischaemic heart disease, pulmonary embolus and left heart failure are suspected.
Consider COPD in patients with other smoking-related diseases 22 [evidence level A]
Patients with COPD are prone to other conditions associated with cigarette smoking, including accelerated cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular disease, and oropharyngeal, laryngeal and lung carcinoma. Conversely, there is a high prevalence of COPD among patients with ischaemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease and cerebrovascular disease and smoking-related carcinomas.22 These patients should be screened for symptoms of COPD, and spirometry should be performed.
Symptom relief
—Inhaled bronchodilators
—Long-acting bronchodilators
—Theophyllines
—Assessment of response and continuation of bronchodilator therapy
—Short-course oral glucocorticoids
—Combination inhaled glucocorticoid/long-acting bronchodilator therapy
—Optimise inhaler technique
—Surgery
—Bullectomy
—Lung volume reduction surgery
—Lung transplantation
—Identify and treat aggravating factors
—Sleep apnoea, hypoventilation and hypoxaemia
—Gastro-oesophageal reflux
—Aspiration
—Alcohol and sedatives
—Hypoxaemia and pulmonary hypertension
—Treatment
—Osteoporosis
—Improve function
—Pulmonary rehabilitation
—Exercise training
—Patient education
—Psychosocial support
—Comprehensive integrated rehabilitation
—Chest physiotherapy
—Weight management and nutrition
The principal goals of therapy are to stop smoking, to optimise function through symptom relief with medications and pulmonary rehabilitation, and to prevent or treat aggravating factors and complications.
Inhaled bronchodilators provide symptom relief and may increase exercise capacity23-30 [evidence level A]
The two classes of inhaled bronchodilators — selective β-adrenoceptor agonists and anticholinergic agents — target airway smooth muscle contraction, which is one cause of the physiological and functional deficits in COPD.23-25
All bronchodilators have been shown to variably improve exercise capacity.26-29 However, changes in simple measurements of airway function (FEV1 , FVC) are not closely correlated with symptomatic improvement or changes in measures of quality of life.30,31 The failure to achieve a large therapeutic response should not necessarily trigger the use of higher doses.23,24 Nebulisers are not recommended for routine use in stable disease32 [evidence level C].
The duration of action of short-acting inhaled anticholinergic agents is greater than that of short-acting β-agonists32 [evidence level A]. The combination of β-agonists and anticholinergics may be more effective and better tolerated than higher doses of either agent used alone32-37 [evidence level A].
The use of bronchodilators according to the severity of COPD6 is shown in Box 9. Appendices 1 and 2 list available products, formulations and delivery devices. Patients must be asked to show that they have effective inhaler technique.
Efforts to maintain or regain physical fitness may match or exceed the benefits of bronchodilator use (see the discussion of pulmonary rehabilitation on page S19).6 Use of a short-acting bronchodilator before an exercise session may reduce dynamic hyperinflation and allow better training effects to be achieved.26
9: Initial treatment with short-acting bronchodilators*
Severity |
FEV1 |
Suggested treatment |
|||||||||
Mild COPD |
60%–80% |
Intermittent bronchodilator — salbutamol (200 μg) or ipratropium bromide (40 μg) as needed before exercise |
|||||||||
Moderate COPD |
40%–59% |
Intermittent or regular bronchodilator — salbutamol (200–400 μg four times daily) or ipratropium bromide (40 μg four times daily). Combination bronchodilators may be considered |
|||||||||
Severe COPD |
< 40% |
Regular combination bronchodilator — salbutamol (200–400 μg four times daily) and ipratropium bromide (40–80 μg four times daily) |
|||||||||
* Modified from GOLD6 [evidence level D]. FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. |
|||||||||||
Long-acting bronchodilators provide sustained relief of symptoms in moderate to severe COPD38-44 [evidence level A]
Long-acting β-agonists (eg, salmeterol and eformoterol) provide bronchodilation for 12 hours38-41 and are widely used for asthma. They are not currently subsidised under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for patients with COPD, although they improve exercise endurance, improve health-related quality of life and reduce both the exacerbation rate and number of hospitalisations.
Salmeterol (50 μg twice daily) has a favourable effect on measures of health-related quality of life.41 The dose–response relationship is low, so, compared with the standard dose, the higher dose of 100 μg twice daily does not further improve quality of life41 [evidence level B].
Eformoterol (12 μg twice daily) improves lung function and symptoms.40
Tiotropium (18 μg daily), a new inhaled anticholinergic agent, has a duration of effect of over 24 hours and is used once daily. It is subsidised under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for use in patients with COPD. Compared with placebo and regular ipratropium, it reduces dyspnoea and exacerbation rate and improves health status42-44 (see Appendix 1).
Theophyllines are rarely used because of their narrow therapeutic index and potential for significant side effects45 [evidence level A]. Some patients with disabling breathlessness may derive benefit from their use.46-48 Theophyllines may have an anti-inflammatory effect or reduce muscle fatigue.49,50 Evidence supports only the slow-release formulation. Dosage should be adjusted according to trough serum levels.51
In some patients a response to bronchodilator therapy may require treatment for up to two months. Parameters for assessing long term responsiveness are outlined in Box 10. Symptomatic and functional benefits can often be demonstrated in the absence of an increase in FEV1 . Other objective measurements, such as an increase in exercise capacity (eg, six-minute walk distance) or an increased inspiratory reserve capacity, may be useful indicators of physiological improvement.
Subjective measurements, such as quality of life, breathlessness and functional limitation (eg, MRC Dyspnoea Scale; see page S8), can determine the patient's perception of benefit.
If there is no improvement:
check inhaler technique;
consider psychosocial issues and deconditioning; and
exclude other causes of exercise impairment (consider specialist referral or a cardiopulmonary exercise test).
10: Assessing long term medication response
At diagnosis
Measure and record FEV1 and FVC after administration of β-agonist
Record MRC Dyspnoea Scale score
Prescribe trial medications as per dosage protocols
At next visit
Remeasure spirometry and MRC Dyspnoea Scale score to determine response to medications
If FEV1 and/or FVC increases more than 15% and more than 300 mL after a treatment trial, and/or MRC Dyspnoea Scale score improves more than 1 unit, the tested medication should be included as ongoing treatment
If FEV1 and/or FVC reverse completely or substantially with inhaled or oral glucocorticoids, consider asthma
If there is no significant response to the medication being tested, it could be ruled out for ongoing treatment
MRC = Medical Research Council. FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in one second. FVC = forced vital capacity.
The long-term use of systemic glucocorticoids in COPD is not recommended52-56 [evidence level A]. Indeed, caution in the long term use of systemic glucocorticoids is necessary because of limited efficacy and potential toxicity in elderly patients.
Some patients with stable COPD show a significant response to oral glucocorticoids (on spirometry or functional assessment). Therefore, a short course (two weeks) of prednisolone (20–50 mg daily) may be tried with appropriate monitoring. A negative bronchodilator response does not predict a negative steroid response.6,57 If there is a response to oral steroids, continued treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids is indicated, but these may fail to maintain the response.57,58 Patients who have a negligible response to glucocorticoids should not use them.
Inhaled glucocorticoids should be considered in patients with a documented response or those who have severe COPD with frequent exacerbations 57-61 [evidence level B]
Inhaled glucocorticoids do not influence the rate of decline in FEV1 in patients with no significant acute reversibility.57-61 Smoking cessation remains the only effective means to affect the decline in lung function for these patients (see Section P).
Patients with clinically significant acute bronchodilator reversibility may benefit from long-term inhaled glucocorticoid therapy. Long term inhaled therapy with glucocorticoids is also indicated in patients with COPD who have significant reversibility of airway function after a more prolonged trial of bronchodilators or glucocorticoids.57-59
In one large RCT of patients with severe non-reversible COPD (mean FEV1 about 40% predicted), high-dose inhaled glucocorticoid (fluticasone, 1000 μg daily) slowed the rate of decline in quality of life over three years and the rate of acute exacerbations without affecting overall decline in lung function.60 Similar results may be expected from high doses of other inhaled glucocorticoids, but are yet to be documented in RCTs. In another large RCT in patents with milder COPD, medium-dose budesonide had no significant impact.59 Some systemic absorption may occur, so the modest benefits of inhaled glucocorticoids must be weighed against the potential risks of easy bruising, cataract formation and possible contribution to osteoporosis.
The response should be assessed with spirometry and measures of performance status, quality of life or both. They should be trialled for three to six months in patients with moderate to severe COPD, and continued if there is objective benefit.
Inhaler devices must be explained and demonstrated for patients to achieve optimal benefit. It is necessary to check regularly that the patient has the correct inhaler technique. Elderly and frail patients, especially those with cognitive deficits, may have difficulty with some devices. The range of devices currently available, the products and dosage, as well as their advantages or disadvantages, are listed in Appendix 2.
In selected patients, a surgical approach may be considered for symptom relief 62-72 [evidence level C].
None of the current surgical approaches in patients with COPD provides a survival advantage.6,62 In view of the potential for serious morbidity and mortality, all surgical treatments require careful assessment by an experienced thoracic medical and surgical team.
This operation involves resection of large bullae (larger than 5 cm). The procedure is most successful where there are very large cysts compressing adjacent apparently normal lung.63-65
Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) involves resection of the most severely affected areas of emphysematous, non-bullous lung.66 This can improve lung elastic recoil and diaphragmatic function.67 LVRS is still an experimental, palliative, surgical procedure. Several large randomised multicentre studies are under way to investigate the effectiveness and cost–benefit of this procedure.68
Surgery is performed electively after a pulmonary rehabilitation program, to remove about 25% of each lung. Physiological improvement (eg, a 40% improvement in FEV1 from about 25% predicted to 35% predicted, and six-minute walk from about 300 to 420 metres) takes weeks to months. The duration of the improvement is 2–4 years. These gains should be weighed against risks of operative and postoperative mortality (around 5%–15%), morbidity and cost.68 However, the natural history of patients with COPD of this severity is a progressive decline in function and early mortality.
In patients with COPD, this procedure usually involves replacement of one diseased lung with a normal lung from an organ donor.69,70 Detailed medical and psychological assessment and counselling are required to avoid excessive morbidity and mortality. Malnutrition, severe weakness and steroid and ventilator dependence predict a poor outcome.71,72 The procedure is most successful when lung disease is the recipient's only medical problem and is usually offered to younger patients (eg, those with α1-antitrypsin deficiency).
Physiological improvement takes weeks to months, and would typically translate to a large improvement in FEV1 (from about 20% to 60% predicted for a single lung transplant), exercise performance and quality of life.69-72
COPD has adverse effects on sleep quality, resulting in poor sleep efficiency, delayed sleep onset, multiple wakenings with fragmentation of sleep architecture, and a high arousal index. Arousals are caused by hypoxia, hypercapnia, nocturnal cough and the pharmacological effects of methylxanthines and β-adrenergic agents.73 Intranasal oxygen administration has been shown to improve sleep architecture and efficiency, as well as oxygen saturation during sleep.74
Indications for full diagnostic polysomnography in patients with COPD include persistent snoring, witnessed apnoeas, choking episodes and excessive daytime sleepiness. In subjects with daytime hypercapnia, monitoring of nocturnal transcutaneous carbon dioxide levels should be considered to assess nocturnal hypoventilation. Patients with COPD with a stable wakeful Pao2 of more than 55 mmHg (7.3 kPa) who have pulmonary hypertension, right heart failure or polycythaemia should also be studied. Overnight pulse oximetry is also useful in patients with COPD in whom long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy is indicated (stable Pao2 < 55 mmHg, or 7.3 kPa) to determine an appropriate oxygen flow rate during sleep.
The overlap syndrome: The combination of COPD and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is known as the "overlap syndrome". The prevalence of COPD in unselected patients with OSA is about 10%, while about 20% of patients with COPD also have OSA.75 Patients with COPD who also have OSA have a higher prevalence of pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure than those without OSA.75 There is frequently a history of excessive alcohol intake. While oxygen administration may diminish the degree of oxygen desaturation, it may increase the frequency and severity of hypoventilation and lead to carbon dioxide retention.
As in other patients with OSA, weight reduction, alcohol avoidance and improvement of nasal patency are useful in those with COPD. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the best method for maintaining patency of the upper airway and may obviate the need for nocturnal oxygen. If nasal CPAP is not effective, then nocturnal bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation should be considered, although the benefits of this in chronic stable COPD remain to be established. The role of other OSA treatments, such as mandibular advancement splinting, remains to be evaluated in the overlap syndrome.
In patients with COPD, hyperinflation, coughing and the increased negative intrathoracic pressures of inspiration may predispose to reflux, especially during recumbency and sleep. Microaspiration of oesophageal secretions (possibly including refluxed gastric content) is a risk, especially with coexistent snoring or OSA. Reflux and microaspiration exacerbate cough, bronchial inflammation and airway narrowing.
Diagnosis may be confirmed by 24-hour monitoring of oesophageal pH, modified barium swallow or gastroscopy. However, a therapeutic trial of therapy with H2 -receptor antagonists or a proton-pump inhibitor may obviate the need for invasive investigations. Lifestyle changes, including stopping smoking, reduced intake of caffeine and alcohol, weight loss and exercise, will also help. Elevation of the head of the bed is also recommended.
Aspiration of food and liquid is common in COPD and may be the cause of recurrent exacerbations and complications, such as pneumonia and patchy pulmonary fibrosis.
Diagnosis is usually easy with an adequate history from patients and their partners or carers. Dry biscuits and thin fluids cause the most difficulty. Confirmation rests with assessment by a speech therapist and a modified barium swallow.
Treatment involves retraining in safe swallowing techniques, which may include:
avoiding talking when eating;
sitting upright;
taking small mouthfuls;
chewing adequately;
drinking with dry foods;
using a straw; and
drinking thickened fluids.
Patients with COPD have impaired gas exchange and an exaggerated fall in Po2 with recumbency and sleep onset.74,75 Excessive use of alcohol and sedatives exacerbates this and predisposes to sleep-disordered breathing.
Heavy cigarette smoking is associated with misuse of other substances in many individuals. Nicotine, caffeine and alcohol also predispose to gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Pulmonary hypertension in patients with COPD results mainly from vasoconstriction of pulmonary arterioles in response to local hypoxia, usually resulting from impaired ventilation, and vasoconstrictor peptides produced by inflammatory cells.76-79 The vasoconstriction minimises blood flow through poorly ventilated lung, reducing the mismatch of ventilation and perfusion. While this compensatory mechanism initially helps to maintain blood gas levels, the price is increased pulmonary vascular resistance, ultimately leading to right ventricular strain and failure (cor pulmonale). The vascoconstriction is reversible initially, but vascular remodelling occurs eventually and the condition becomes irreversible. In pulmonary emphysema there is also an anatomical disruption of capillaries in alveolar walls.
Right ventricular hypertrophy is seen in about 40% of patients with an FEV1 less than 1.0 L and in 70% of those with an FEV1 less than 0.6 L. The presence of hypercapnia is strongly associated with cor pulmonale.
When pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale seem out of proportion with the severity of airway narrowing, the additional factors that need to be considered include:
sleep apnoea (central and obstructive);
polycythaemia; and
recurrent pulmonary thromboembolism.
The development of pulmonary hypertension and peripheral oedema is a poor prognostic sign in COPD.80 If untreated, the five-year survival rate is about 30%. Pulmonary hypertension is difficult to detect on clinical evaluation in patients with COPD.
Chest x-rays may show enlargement of proximal pulmonary arteries, but right ventricular enlargement is difficult to detect because of hyperinflation. Right axis deviation and P pulmonale on ECG may be difficult to detect because of low voltage traces (also a result of hyperinflation). Multifocal atrial tachycardia and atrial fibrillation are common.
Echocardiography is the best non-invasive method of assessing pulmonary hypertension, but image quality is reduced by hyperinflation. Echocardiography is indicated in patients with severe disease, or when symptoms seem out of proportion to the severity of airflow limitation. Estimation of pressure relies on at least some tricuspid regurgitation. Other findings include mid-systolic closure of the pulmonic valve and increased right ventricular wall thickness.
Treat underlying lung disease: The logical first step is to optimise lung function and treat all potential aggravating conditions.
Oxygen therapy: Long term, continuous (> 15 h/day) oxygen therapy to treat chronic hypoxaemia prolongs survival of patients with COPD, presumably by reducing pulmonary hypertension.12,13,80-82 (For a detailed description of oxygen therapy in COPD see Section P, page S21).
Ventilatory support: For patients with COPD who also have sleep apnoea or hypoventilation, ventilatory support with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may be more appropriate than oxygen therapy (for more details see Section X, page S29). The efficacy of NIPPV for long-term treatment has not yet been proven.74,83-85
Diuretics: Diuretics may reduce right ventricular filling pressure and oedema, but excessive volume depletion must be avoided. Volume status can be monitored by measuring serum creatinine and urea levels. Diuretics may cause metabolic alkalosis resulting in suppression of ventilatory drive.
Digoxin: Digoxin is not indicated in the treatment of cor pulmonale and may increase the risk of arrhythmia when hypoxaemia is present.6 It may be used to control the rate of atrial fibrillation.
Vasodilators: Vasodilators (hydralazine, nitrates, nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors) do not produce sustained relief of pulmonary hypertension in patients with COPD.86,87 They can worsen oxygenation (by increasing blood flow through poorly ventilated lung) and result in systemic hypotension. However, a cautious trial may be used in patients with severe or persistent pulmonary hypertension not responsive to oxygen therapy. Some vasodilators (eg, calcium antagonists) have been shown to reduce right ventricular pressure with minimal side effects and increased well-being, at least in the short term. Nitric oxide worsens V/Q mismatching and is therefore contraindicated in patients with COPD.86,87
Prevent or treat osteoporosis 88 [evidence level A]
Patients with COPD have high rates of bone fracture (11%–14%) and bone mineral density (BMD) an average of 10% lower compared with control patients.88 A 10% drop in BMD equates to a 2.6-fold increase in fracture risk.88 Greater deficits are seen in patients with more severe disease.
The risk factors for low BMD in patients with COPD include periods of immobilisation or hospitalisation, low FEV1 , use of corticosteroids, decreased weight-bearing activity, and smoking. Other risk factors relevant to the general population also apply. These include low calcium intake, low body mass index, alcohol abuse and hypogonadism.
All patients who take corticosteroids should be advised to undertake regular, weight-bearing exercise (eg, walking and light resistance training). Those who have had long-term steroid therapy at lower doses and who have other risk factors should be screened.
Intervention should be targeted at men and women who are taking more than 15 mg daily of prednisolone or who have several risk factors for osteoporosis and whose BMD is < 1.5 standard deviations below the young adult mean.88 Oral bisphosphonates, particularly risedronate, have been shown to be effective in preventing and treating bone loss in men and women taking corticosteroids.88 However, most patients in these studies did not have respiratory disease. The studies also showed a reduction in risk of spinal fracture, especially in postmenopausal women. Other agents that have been used with some success in patients with respiratory disease include calcium, vitamin D and medroxyprogesterone acetate.
Selecting patients with COPD who may be at increased risk of osteoporosis is most appropriately done on the basis of conventional risk factors. Further refining of clinical predictors and more evidence for the cost-effectiveness of such programs still needs to be resolved before recommendations on a screening strategy in patients with COPD can be made. For more information on prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, see the current Australian guidelines.88
Pulmonary rehabilitation reduces dyspnoea, anxiety and depression, improves exercise capacity and quality of life and may reduce hospitalisation 89-107 [evidence level A]
Pulmonary rehabilitation is one of the most effective interventions in COPD89-93 and has been shown to reduce symptoms, disability and handicap and to improve functioning by:
improving cardiovascular fitness, muscle function and exercise endurance;89,90,93-99
enhancing the patient's self-confidence and coping strategies, and improving medication adherence and use of respiratory treatment devices;89-91,95,100-103
improving mood by controlling anxiety and panic, decreasing depression, and reducing social impediments.89,90,104
Pulmonary rehabilitation should be offered to patients with moderate to severe COPD, but can be relevant for people with any long-term respiratory disorder characterised by dyspnoea.101,102 Exercise programs alone have clear benefits,103 while the benefits of education or psychosocial support without exercise training are less well documented.101,104-106 Comprehensive programs incorporating all three interventions have the greatest benefits (see below).
Most research has been undertaken with hospital-based programs, but there is increasing evidence of benefit from rehabilitation in the community.95,100
Numerous randomised controlled trials in moderate to severe COPD have shown decreased symptoms (breathlessness and fatigue) and improved cardiovascular fitness, exercise endurance, health-related quality of life and mood following exercise conditioning alone103 [evidence level A]. Improvements in muscle strength and self-efficacy have also been reported.89-100,103
The evidence for benefit from high-intensity training of the respiratory muscles is less convincing.101,103,104 Some very disabled patients are shown how to reduce unnecessary energy expenditure for activities of daily living.101 Some patients may benefit from portable oxygen (see section P, page S21).
Maintenance of activities is essential for continuing the benefits from the initial training program. Home- or community-based exercise should be encouraged6,105 [evidence level D].
There is limited evidence that education alone can improve self-management skills, mood and health-related quality of life105-107 [evidence level C]. Providing information and tools to enhance self-management in an interactive session is more effective than didactic teaching.105,108
The single most important intervention is assistance with smoking cessation.6 Good nutrition; task optimisation for more severely disabled patients; access to community resources; help with control of anxiety, panic or depression; instruction on effective use of medications and therapeutic devices (including oxygen where necessary); relationships; end-of-life issues; continence; safety for flying; and other issues may be addressed.6,101,102
Improved exercise tolerance, mood, self-efficacy and health-related quality of life have been reported from cognitive behavioural therapy alone102,105 [evidence level C]. Depression, anxiety and panic are frequent complications of chronic disabling breathlessness, with dependence and social isolation being common.109 General support, specific behavioural training and the use of appropriate antidepressant medications may enhance quality of life for the patient, and for the spouse or carer.
Comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation,89-103,110-116 which includes all the components discussed above, enhances health-related quality of life and self-efficacy, improves exercise performance, and reduces breathlessness and healthcare use [evidence level A]. It is possible to provide these comprehensive programs in the community,95,100-102 as well as in larger hospitals.114
Lung support groups may provide patients and carers with emotional support, social interaction, and other social outlets, and help them gain new knowledge and coping strategies. More than 80 groups throughout Australia can be contacted via LungNet (toll-free phone number, 1800 654 301; Internet address, http://www.lungnet.com.au. In New Zealand, contact the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation of New Zealand (phone (04) 499 4592; Internet address, http://www.asthmanz.co.nz).
A systematic review in COPD and bronchiectasis showed a significant increase in sputum clearance with no change in lung function or health status117 [evidence level B].
The aims of chest physiotherapy are to assist sputum removal and improve ventilation without increasing the distress of the patient.117 Auscultation plus chest x-ray findings help determine the regions of the lung to be treated. Bronchodilator therapy before treatment may result in a more effective treatment. If patients are hypoxaemic (Spo2 , < 88%), supplemental oxygen is given during treatment.
Various techniques and devices are available to aid sputum removal. The choice of technique depends on the volume of sputum, the patient's condition (eg, extent of airflow limitation, severity of breathlessness), patient preference and the cognitive status of the patient.
In patients with COPD, both excess and low weight are associated with increased morbidity. Excessive weight increases the work of breathing and predisposes to sleep apnoea — both central hypoventilation and upper-airway obstruction. Progressive weight loss (body mass index < 20) is an important prognostic factor for poor survival118,119 [evidence level A]. This may be the result of a relative catabolic state (related to high energy demands of increased work of breathing) added to disturbance of nutritional intake (related to breathlessness while eating). Deleterious consequences include combined protein–energy malnutrition,119 and possibly mineral or essential vitamin and antioxidant deficiencies.119
Randomised controlled trials of nutritional support in COPD have not shown significant improvements in nutrition, exercise capacity or other outcomes [evidence level B]. Patients with COPD should not eat large meals, as this can increase dyspnoea. Several small nutritious (high energy, high protein) meals are better tolerated. Snacks may provide a useful addition to energy and nutrient intake. Referral to a dietitian for individual advice may be beneficial.
Risk factor reduction
—Smoking cessation
—Nicotine replacement therapy
—Bupropion
—Prevent smoking relapse
—Influenza vaccination
—Pneumococcal vaccination
—Antibiotics
—Glucocorticoids
—Mucolytic agents
—Regular review
—Oxygen therapy
—Fitness to fly
Reducing risk factors for COPD is a priority, and smoking is the most important of these. Reduction of exposure to occupational dust, fumes and gases and to indoor and outdoor air pollutants is also recommended6 [evidence level D]. Influenza vaccination reduces the risk of exacerbations and death [evidence level A], while long term oxygen therapy reduces mortality [evidence level A].
A successful smoking cessation strategy involves integration of public policy, information dissemination programs and health education through the media and schools.6
Smoking prevention and cessation programs should be implemented and be made readily available6,120 [evidence level A].
Smoking cessation (see Box 3) has been shown to halt the accelerated decline in lung function seen with COPD6,7 [evidence level A]. People who continue to smoke despite having pulmonary disease are highly nicotine dependent and may require treatment with pharmacological agents to help them quit.121,122
Smoking cessation interventions have been shown to be effective in both sexes, in all racial and ethnic groups tested, and in pregnant women.6 International data show that smoking cessation strategies are cost effective, but with a 10-fold range in cost per life-year gained depending on the intensity of the program and the use of pharmacological therapies.6
General practitioners and pharmacists can help smokers quit.123-125 Relapse is common [evidence level A]
Brief counselling is effective [evidence level A] and every smoker should be offered at least this intervention at every visit.6 Currently accepted best practice is summarised in the 5-A strategy: 6
Ask and identify smokers.
Advise smokers about the risks of smoking and benefits of quitting and discuss options.
Assess the degree of nicotine dependence and motivation or readiness to quit.
Assist cessation — this may include specific advice about pharmacological interventions or referral to a formal cessation program if available.
Arrange follow-up to reinforce messages.
Cessation of smoking is a process rather than a single event, and smokers cycle through the stages of being not ready, unsure, ready, quitting and relapsing before achieving long-term success. The aim of initial intervention is to advance one stage in the cessation cycle. The most strenuous efforts should be made with those smokers ready to quit or quitting. Cessation rates increase with the amount of support and intervention, including practical counselling and social support arranged outside of treatment.