|
Healthcare
Poisoning with the recreational drug paramethoxyamphetamine
("death")
Liang Han Ling, Colin Marchant, Nicholas A Buckley, Michael Prior and
Rod J Irvine
MJA 2001; 174: 453-455
Abstract -
Methods -
Results -
Discussion -
Acknowedgements -
Authors' details
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
More articles on Pharmacology - More articles on Drugs and alcohol
|
|
Objective: To describe the clinical features of
paramethoxyamphetamine (PMA; "death") poisoning and to compare
these with those of people with self-reported "ecstasy" poisoning.
Design: Retrospective casenote review.
Participants and setting: 22 patients who presented
to the Emergency Department of the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH), a
major metropolitan teaching hospital, between 1 January 1996 and 31
December 1998 with PMA poisoning identified through urine drug
screens; and 61 patients with self-reported ecstasy poisoning
between 1 September 1997 and 31 December 1998 found through the
hospital databases.
Results: Patients with PMA poisoning presented with
tachycardia (64%), hyperthermia (temperature > 37.5ºC; 36%),
coma (41%), seizures (32%), arrhythmias (23%), and QRS intervals
100 ms (50%) with greater frequency and often greater severity than
those with self-reported ecstasy poisoning. Two patients with PMA
poisoning presented with severe hypoglycaemia (blood glucose
level, < 1.5 mmol/L) accompanied by hyperkalaemia (K+ concentration, > 7.5 mmol/L).
Conclusions: At our hospital, PMA poisonings
accounted for most of the severe reactions among people who believed
they had taken ecstasy. Hypoglycaemia and hyperkalaemia may be
specific to PMA poisoning. PMA toxicity should be suspected with
severe or atypical reactions to "ecstasy", and confirmed by
chromatographic urine drug screens.
|
|
|
The recreational use of amphetamine derivatives among young people
is common, particularly at dance clubs and dance parties ("raves").
3,4- Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), popularly known as
"ecstasy", was first identified in street use in 1972.1 Another
amphetamine derivative, paramethoxyamphetamine (PMA), also
appeared in recreational use during the 1970s. PMA, and other
amphetamine derivatives, such as
3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) and
3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), are known to have been sold on
the street as ecstasy.2,3 Within a few years, PMA was
associated with several fatalities in Canada and earned the
street-name "death".4 Further fatalities
associated with PMA toxicity have only been reported in significant
numbers in South Australia,2,5,6 where at least eight
deaths have occurred since September 1995, while no deaths from MDMA
alone were reported in the same period (P D Felgate, Scientist,
Forensic Science Centre, South Australia, personal
communication).
The toxic effects of MDMA are well described,7-10 and the few previous case
reports of PMA poisoning showed similar toxic effects.2,4,5
Serotonergic and sympathomimetic symptoms include anxiety,
agitation, nausea, and palpitations. Life-threatening adverse
effects of MDMA include severe hyperthermia, disseminated
intravascular coagulation, rhabdomyolysis, multiorgan failure,
arrhythmias, intracerebral haemorrhage, seizures, and
hyponatraemia leading to cerebral oedema.3,11
While case reports of PMA deaths collectively suggest that PMA is more
toxic than MDMA, the clinical effects of PMA have not yet been studied
systematically. Here, we report a series of non-fatal, confirmed PMA
poisonings, all in patients presenting to the emergency department
of a metropolitan hospital in South Australia.
|
|
Methods |
We conducted a retrospective casenote review of all PMA poisonings
identified through urine drug screens of patients presenting to the
Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) Emergency Department between 1
January 1996 and 31 December 1998. We included PMA poisonings
involving the coadministration of MDMA or other substances. Urine
drug screens had been performed by enzyme immunoassay, with
confirmation of positive results by gas chromatography and mass
spectrometry, according to Australian Standard 4308 (1995). Data
were retrieved from casenotes by means of standardised forms and
entered into a computer database.
Findings were compared with those for all other patients presenting
to the RAH between 1 September 1997 and 31 December 1998 because of
adverse effects after the self-reported use of "ecstasy". These
patients were identified by reviewing casenotes of all stimulant
drug poisonings through admission diagnosis-related group coding
and recorded in the RAH Emergency Department database; a few
additional cases that had been wrongly coded were identified through
urine drug screens. Confirmation of MDMA exposure by urine drug
screens was not available for most patients in this comparison group.
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Royal Adelaide
Hospital ethics committee.
|
|
Results |
Twenty-two PMA poisonings were confirmed by urine drug screens
between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 1998. These occurred in the
first eight months and last eight months of the study period, with 16
months of no confirmed PMA poisonings in between. The casenotes of 15
of these 22 patients recorded that they believed they had taken
ecstasy. No patient's records showed that he or she knowingly took
PMA. Sixty-one patients with self-reported ecstasy (MDMA)
poisoning presented to RAH between 1 September 1997 and 31 December
1998. Their characteristics and clinical features are compared with
the PMA group in the Box.
Eleven patients with PMA poisoning had only relatively minor
symptoms (anxiety, agitation, delirium, hallucinations,
headache, involuntary movements, vomiting). Frequent signs
recorded in these patients included tachycardia (heart rate >
100 bpm), mild hyperthermia (temperature, > 37.5ºC) and a
prolonged QRS interval on electrocardiogram, often with a right
bundle branch block pattern.
A much larger proportion of patients with ecstasy poisoning
presented with relatively minor symptoms.
The other 11 patients with PMA poisoning had life-threatening
toxicity with coma, generalised seizures, severe hyperthermia
(temperature, > 40ºC) or hypothermia (temperature, <
34.5ºC), and some had arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation [2],
multifocal ventricular ectopic beats [2], supraventricular
tachycardia [1]). Two patients with PMA poisoning presented with
severe hypoglycaemia (blood glucose level, < 1.5 mmol/L; normal
range, 3.8-5.5 mmol/L), accompanied by hyperkalaemia (K+, > 7.5 mmol/L; normal range, 3.1-4.2
mmol/L).
|
|
Discussion |
PMA and MDMA are structurally and pharmacologically similar,
producing their effects through serotonergic, dopaminergic, and
noradrenergic mechanisms. The recent case reports of PMA-related
deaths in South Australia5,6 suggest that PMA is more
toxic than MDMA, but do not provide a clinical explanation for this
difference. Our retrospective study showed that most people with PMA
poisoning present with clinical features that are qualitatively
similar to those of people with ecstasy poisoning (ie, hyperthermia,
coma, and seizures), but that these symptoms occur more frequently
and are more severe in those who took PMA.
Certain features, such as QRS interval prolongation, hypoglycaemia
and hyperkalemia, appear unique to PMA poisoning, suggesting there
may be toxicological mechanisms different from those of MDMA
contributing to PMA's adverse effects. Our patients with PMA
poisoning did not have significant acidosis, haemolysis or tissue
damage to explain the hyperkalaemia. The high frequencies of
prolonged QRS intervals and seizure suggest that PMA may have
sodium-channel-blocking properties.
Severe hypoglycaemia has never previously been reported as an
adverse effect of PMA. The affected patients did not have liver
failure at the time, nor were other drugs detected that might explain
the hypoglycaemia. However, PMA is a monoamine oxidase (MAO)
inhibitor,12 and other MAO inhibitors
have been reported to stimulate insulin release.13 There are only
two human studies on PMA, neither of which provides an explanation for
serious toxic effects.
Sustained blood pressure elevation of up to 240/130 mmHg occurred in
some people taking PMA at a dose of 1 mg/kg bodyweight,4 and PMA was found
to be three times as potent as the amphetamine derivative MDA as a
hallucinogen.14
Our retrospective study design makes direct comparison between PMA
and MDMA impossible. As urine drug screens were not routinely
performed in presentations involving stimulant use, it is
impossible to determine the exact frequency of PMA and MDMA
poisonings presenting over the study period, or to identify a large
enough cohort of people poisoned with MDMA alone to serve as a control
group. Coadministration of other drugs and inconsistencies in
casenote reporting are further factors which would have confounded
the comparison of PMA and MDMA poisonings. However, the coronial data
and the unique toxicological features of the known PMA poisonings we
identified are sufficient to demonstrate that PMA accounts for most
severe adverse events after apparent ecstasy ingestion in Adelaide.
As PMA does not account for the majority of ecstasy use, this implies
that PMA is substantially more toxic than MDMA.
The serious acute toxic effects of MDMA are generally related to
hyperthermia, which results from a combination of temperature
deregulation, excessive physical activity and high ambient
temperatures.3 This knowledge has led to
moderately successful public health and education programs to
highlight these dangers and encourage users of MDMA at "rave" parties
to ensure adequate hydration and to take breaks to cool down. However,
much of the serious toxicity we describe with PMA, such as sudden
collapse and seizures, may not be amenable to such harm-minimisation
approaches.
Although the actual doses ingested by our patients are not known, only
one person reported taking more than two tablets and none were
deliberate overdoses. Estimates of dose are unreliable, not only
because of the difficulty in obtaining a reliable history of illicit
drug use, but also because of variations in tablet strength. However,
analysis of recently confiscated ecstasy capsules and tablets shows
similar mean concentrations of the active ingredient in those
containing PMA (73 mg) and MDMA (106 mg) (P D Felgate, Forensic Science
Centre, South Australia, personal communication). Thus, the
apparent greater toxicity of PMA is unlikely to be explained by the
dose received.
Despite the poor reputation of PMA, its use remains a continuing
health concern in Australia. Deaths from PMA use have been reported
most frequently in Adelaide, but also in Queensland and Western
Australia.2 PMA toxicity should be
suspected in patients presenting with severe or atypical reactions
to ecstasy and the diagnosis can be confirmed by chromatographic
urine drug screens.
|
| |
We thank Dr Christopher Angley, Staff Consultant, RAH, for
assistance with database searching, and the South Australian
Forensic Science Centre for figures on illicit stimulant deaths in
South Australia.
|
|
References |
- Buchanan JF, Brown CR. "Designer drugs". A problem in clinical
toxicology. Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp 1988; 3: 1-17.
-
Felgate HE, Felgate PD, James RA, et al. Recent
paramethoxyamphetamine deaths. J Analyt Toxicol 1998; 22:
169-172.
-
Milroy CM. Ten years of "ecstasy". J R Soc Med 1999; 92:
68-71.
-
Cimbura G. PMA deaths in Ontario. CMAJ 1974; 110:
1263-1267.
-
Byard RW, Gilbert J, James R, Lokan RJ. Amphetamine derivative
fatalities in South Australia -- is "Ecstasy" the culprit? Am J
Forensic Med Pathol 1998; 19: 261-265.
-
Byard RW, James RA, Gilbert JD, Felgate PD. Another PMA-related
fatality in Adelaide. Med J Aust 1999; 170: 139-140.
-
Green AR, Cross AJ, Goodwin GM. Review of the pharmacology and
clinical pharmacology of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine
(MDMA or "Ecstasy"). Psychopharmacol 1995; 119: 247-260.
-
McCann UD, Slate SO, Ricaurte GA. Adverse reactions with
3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; "ecstasy"). Drug
Safety 1996; 15: 107-115.
-
Rochester JA, Kirchner JT. Ecstasy
(3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine): history, neurochemistry,
and toxicology. J Am Board Family Pract 1999; 12: 137-142.
-
Steele TD, McCann UD, Ricaurte GA.
3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, "Ecstasy"):
pharmacology and toxicology in animals and humans.
Addiction 1994; 89: 539-551.
-
Henry JA, Jeffreys KJ, Dawling S. Toxicity and deaths from
3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine ("ecstasy"). Lancet
1992; 340: 384-387.
-
Ask AL, Fagervall I, Ross SB. Selective inhibition of monoamine
oxidase in monoaminergic neurons in the rat brain. Naunyn
Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1983; 324: 79-87.
-
Stockley IH. Drug interactions. 4th ed. London: The
Pharmaceutical Press; 1996.
-
Galloway G, Shulgin AT, Kornfeld H, Frederick SL. Amphetamine,
not MDMA, is associated with intracranial hemorrhage. J Accident
Emerg Med 1995; 12: 231-232.
(Received 20 Sep 2000, accepted 15 Feb 2001)
|
| |
Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, Faculty of
Medicine, University of Adelaide, SA.
Liang Han Ling, 5th Year Medical Student; Colin
Marchant, 6th Year Medical Student; Nicholas A Buckley,
FRACP, MD, Senior Consultant; Rod J Irvine, PhD, Research
Fellow.
Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, SA.
Michael Prior, BAppSc, FAIMS, Senior Scientist,
Toxicology.
Reprints will not be available from the authors. Correspondence: Dr N
A Buckley, Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology,
Faculty of Medicine, University of Adelaide, SA 5000.
nbuckleyATmail.rah.sa.gov.au
©MJA 2001
Make a
comment
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2001 Medical Journal of Australia.
|
| |
|
| |
| Demographic and clinical data for patients
confirmed to have ingested paramethoxyamphetamine (PMA) compared with others
who reported ingesting "ecstasy" |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
PMA
(n=22) |
"Ecstasy"
(n=61) |
% Difference
(95% CI) |
P* |
|
| Median age (range) |
23 (18-32) |
22 (17-35) |
|
0.1115 |
| Males |
15 (68%) |
33 (54%) |
14% (-10% to
38%) |
0.3176 |
Cardiovascular effects
Median pulse (range) |
118 (52-218) |
88 (46-160) |
|
0.0156 |
No. (%) with:
Pulse 100bpm
QRS interval 100ms
Arrhythmias |
14 (64%)
11 (50%)
5 (23%) |
25 (41%)
3 (5%)
3 (5%) |
23% (-1% to 46%)
45% (23%-67%)
18% (-1% to 36%) |
0.0842
<0.0001
0.0278 |
Metabolic effects
Median temperature
Range |
37°C
32-42°C |
36°C
32-38°C |
|
0.1185 |
No. (%) with:
Temperature >37.5°C
Temperature >40.0°C |
8 (36%)
4 (18%) |
3 (5%)
0 |
31% (11%-52%)
18% (2%-34%) |
0.0008
0.004 |
Neurological effects
Median Glasgow coma score
Range |
12.5
3-15 |
15
4-15 |
|
0.0018
|
No. (%) with:
Glasgow coma score < 8
Seizures |
9 (41%)
7 (32%) |
4 (7%)
2 (3%) |
34% (13%-56%)
29% (9%-49%) |
0.0005
0.001 |
No. (%) with
life-threatening toxicity† |
11 (50%) |
4 (7%) |
43% (22%-65%) |
<0.0001 |
|
*Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney
U test.
†Seizures, temperature >40°C or Glasgow coma score <6. |
|
|
| Back to text |
|