| |
Ask doctors to nominate the symbols of their profession and many will
select the Hippocratic Oath or the serpented staff of Aesculapius.
Ask the same question of a person in the street and the stethoscope or
the doctor's black bag are common responses. However, the most
recognisable symbol of the profession is the white coat.1 Indeed, media
portrayal of doctors in Marcus Welby MD or ER
showcases the obligatory white coat and dangling stethoscope.
Doctors first wore white coats in the late 19th century when science
began to make significant inroads into medicine and physicians
adopted the laboratory coat as their own.1 Its initial purpose was to
protect the patient and physician from cross-contamination, but, as
the partnership between science and medicine2 transformed hospitals from
institutions for the dying to centres for curing the sick, the white
coat became a potent symbol of the authority of science and the art of
healing. Superimpose on this metamorphosis Western cultural
connotations of whiteness — "life, purity, innocence, superhuman
power, goodness — and it is easy to see how the white coat became the
favored garment for physicians".1,3
However, as the 20th century advanced, and sociologists turned their
attention to medicine4,5 and the dynamics of the
patient-doctor relationship, the white coat was seen increasingly
as a barrier to effective communication. In an attempt to dispel this
perception, paediatricians, psychiatrists and doctors in private
practice shed the white coat. Furthermore, the changes in society and
healthcare that turned doctors into "healthcare providers" and
patients into "clients, consumers or customers" also witnessed the
extinction of the white-coated doctor. Today, doctors in our
hospitals have become a hidden species, virtually
indistinguishable from other hospital personnel or even patients'
visitors.
But what do Australian patients want doctors to wear? In this issue of
the Journal, Harnett explores this
question.6 Among patients attending
oncology clinics, a clear majority preferred junior doctors to wear
white coats "for identification purposes" or because "it looked more
professional". For senior doctors, the issue was not as clear-cut,
but many of the patients still preferred these doctors to wear white
coats.
These findings are not surprising. There is now substantive
information that adult patients prefer doctors in clinics and
hospitals to be traditionally, or at least smartly,
dressed;7-12 to wear a
necktie;7-9,11,12 to have short
hair;8,10,12 and to wear white
coats with a name tag.7,8,10-12
Does all this foreshadow a rebirth of doctors in white coats? Probably
not. Most of the current information on patients' preferences for
doctors' attire is derived from limited cross-sectional surveys. In
the current era of evidence-based healthcare, any return of the white
coat awaits the outcome of a randomised controlled trial to settle the
question: to be or not to be in a white coat!
And yet, the practice of medicine involves more than its subservience
to evidence or science. It also involves issues such as the meaning of
service and feelings of professional pride. In this context, the
white coat has become a symbol for the humane face of medicine and its
professionalism in the newly discovered white coat
ceremonies.13 To date a uniquely North
American phenomenon, these ceremonies are performed each year for
students entering US medical schools. The students (accompanied by
friends and families) are welcomed into the profession by the
assembled faculty of the medical school. After an address by an
eminent member of the profession, each student is presented with, and
helped into, his or her white coat by the dean and other faculty
members. This robing ceremony is followed by a public proclamation by
the students of their professional commitment akin to the
Hippocratic Oath. Inaugurated in 1993 by the Arnold P Gold
Foundation, the white coat ceremony had already been adopted by 93 US
medical schools some five years later,14 suggesting a groundswell
in the search for meaning in service to the community in medicine and in
professionalism.
The Foundation has identified six components of the ceremony to "help
create an environment which fosters a psychological contract for
professionalism and empathy in medicine".13 These include
- The presence of friends and families "representing the support and
value system closest to the student";
- The welcome by the dean and faculty of the school and its hospitals
"representing the value system of the school and the new profession
they are about to enter";
- An inspiring address by a physician role-model;
- The personal robing with the white coat through which senior doctors
"demonstrate their belief in the student's ability to carry on the
noble tradition of doctoring";
- A public proclamation by the students of the Hippocratic Oath or a
similar declaration representing their "willingness to assume the
obligations and responsibilities of the medical profession"; and
- A reception celebrating the students' new professional status "to
reinforce an important and memorable moment".
The white coat ceremony is not without its critics who question its
appropriateness and perceive a darker symbolism;3 nor are there
comparable exercises in Australian medical schools. In these
troubled times of uncertainty and confusion in medicine, might not
the time be right to rediscover the white coat as a symbol of our purpose
and our pride as a profession?
Martin B Van Der Weyden
Editor
Medical Journal of Australia
- Blumhagen DW. The doctor's white coat. The image of the physician in
modern America. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91: 95-119.
-
Weatheral D. Science and the quiet art. Medical research and
patient care. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1995: 55-88.
-
Wear D. On white coats and professional development: the formal and
the hidden curricula. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 734-737.
-
Annandale E. The sociology of health and medicine. A critical
introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998: 4-32.
-
Freidson E. Profession of medicine. New York: Harper and Rowe,
1970.
-
Harnett PR. Should doctors wear white coats ? Med J Aust
2001; 174: 343-344.
-
Dunn JJ, Lee TH, Percelay JM, et al. Patient and house officer
attitudes on physician attire and etiquette. JAMA 1987; 257:
65-68.
-
Gjerdingen DW, Simpson DE, Titus SL. Patients' and physicians'
attitudes regarding the physician's professional appearance.
Arch Intern Med 1987; 147: 1209-1212.
-
McKinstry B, Wang J-X. Putting on the style: what patients think of
the way their doctor dresses. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41: 275-278.
-
Hennessy N, Harrison DA, Aitkenhead AR. The effect of the
anaesthetist's attire on patient attitudes. Anaesthesia
1993; 48: 219-222.
-
Gledhill JA, Warner JP, King M. Psychiatrists and their patients:
views on forms of dress and address. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 171:
228-232.
-
Menahem S, Shvartzman P. Is our appearance important to our
patients? Fam Pract 1998; 15: 391-397.
-
Gillon R. White coat ceremonies for new medical students. J Med
Ethics 2000; 26: 83-84.
-
Branch WT Jr. Deconstructing the white coat. Ann Intern
Med 1998; 129: 740-742.
©MJA 2001
Make a
comment
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 2001 Medical Journal of Australia.
|